follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Engine, Exhaust, Transmission

Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-26-2024, 03:39 AM   #1
mkodama
86 Challenge
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 118
Thanks: 33
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Main bearing oil clearance measuring out of spec

Can somebody help me figure out why my main bearings are measuring out of specification? Both my used OEM and new King bearings are measuring DOUBLE the oil clearance specified in a 2017 Toyota 86 service manual.

2017 BRZ FA20D, 44k miles, performance rebuild.

Main bearings journal OD, specified: 67.985-68.003mm
Main bearing journal OD, measured: 67.986, 67.990, 67.990, 67.990, 67.989

Main bearing ID, not specified.
Main bearing ID, measured, used OEM bearings: 68.030, 68.046, 68.038, 68.038, 68.033
Main bearing ID, measured, new King bearings: 68.033, 68.046, 68.046, 68.051, 68.033

Oil clearance, specified: 0.013-0.031mm
Oil clearance, calculated, used OEM bearings: 0.044, 0.056, 0.048, 0.048, 0.044
Oil clearance, calculated, new King bearings: 0.047, 0.056, 0.056, 0.061, 0.044

-Ambient temp and block is 20.8C
-Block halves torques together per manual.
-I’m measuring the crank main journal OD directly with my micrometers after checking micrometer with the included gauge pin.
-I’m measuring the bearing ID by checking micrometers with a gage pin, setting the micrometer to 68.000mm, then zeroing my bore gauge to the smallest value I can get between the micrometer, then measuring the smallest value inside the bearing. My bore gage is inch so my math is 68.000mm+(measurement*25.4).
- Oil clearance = bearing ID - journal OD

Help.
mkodama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2024, 11:39 AM   #2
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: 926
Thanked 992 Times in 568 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Run 0w40 and call it good.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tokay444 For This Useful Post:
RT-BRZ (12-26-2024)
Old 12-26-2024, 06:33 PM   #3
callisto
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Drives: 2019 Subaru BRZ
Location: NA
Posts: 64
Thanks: 31
Thanked 39 Times in 22 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I don’t have engine assembly experience, but some triage thoughts for you to check if you have not already - once in a while a naive eye can help:

https://www.ft86club.com/files/BRZengine.pdf

This is presumably for at-launch 2013 engines; page EM-120 is where you’re at; your journal diameter measurement is in bounds. There are other measurements recommended, all the way back from EM-107 forward; are they all in scope as well? Especially re: piston diameter and crankshaft tolerances, though this is where I declare inexperience and tap out.

My 2019 service manual has a different/tighter upper tolerance on crankshaft journal diameter (max 68.003) on page IN-15. I didn’t check the other figures (though I see one of the crank shaft bearing thickness limits tightened as well) but duly noted since you’re probably across the facelift boundary.

Chances are, you’re already familiar with all of this, so this is unhelpful; but if somehow it pans out, cheers.
callisto is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to callisto For This Useful Post:
mkodama (12-27-2024), Tokay444 (12-27-2024), Ultramaroon (12-28-2024)
Old 12-26-2024, 11:44 PM   #4
Luns
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Drives: 2017 GT86
Location: California
Posts: 65
Thanks: 13
Thanked 41 Times in 30 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkodama View Post
-I’m measuring the crank main journal OD directly with my micrometers after checking micrometer with the included gauge pin.
-I’m measuring the bearing ID by checking micrometers with a gage pin, setting the micrometer to 68.000mm, then zeroing my bore gauge to the smallest value I can get between the micrometer, then measuring the smallest value inside the bearing. My bore gage is inch so my math is 68.000mm+(measurement*25.4).
- Oil clearance = bearing ID - journal OD
Having never done an oil clearance measurement, I don't know how big a difference this would make, but I would suggest bypassing the gauge pins.

Just zero your bore gauge to wherever your micrometer ends up from measuring the journal OD. Then the bore gauge just reads the oil clearance directly. If I understand your procedure correctly, you're including two more measurements (the two involving gauge pins), and their associated errors, into your final calculation.

One would hope these errors don't overwhelm the actual measurement in which case you'd get the same result, but if the result turns out different - hopefully closer to spec - I'd go with that.
Luns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2024, 03:58 AM   #5
mkodama
86 Challenge
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Drives: 2017 BRZ
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 118
Thanks: 33
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Run 0w40 and call it good.
I did and it worked so far, but I’m taking so many other risks I can’t afford to risk something simple like this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by callisto View Post
I don’t have engine assembly experience, but some triage thoughts for you to check if you have not already - once in a while a naive eye can help:

https://www.ft86club.com/files/BRZengine.pdf

This is presumably for at-launch 2013 engines; page EM-120 is where you’re at; your journal diameter measurement is in bounds. There are other measurements recommended, all the way back from EM-107 forward; are they all in scope as well? Especially re: piston diameter and crankshaft tolerances, though this is where I declare inexperience and tap out.

My 2019 service manual has a different/tighter upper tolerance on crankshaft journal diameter (max 68.003) on page IN-15. I didn’t check the other figures (though I see one of the crank shaft bearing thickness limits tightened as well) but duly noted since you’re probably across the facelift boundary.

Chances are, you’re already familiar with all of this, so this is unhelpful; but if somehow it pans out, cheers.
Yep, 2017+ car so I’m going off a 2017 Toyota manual. The engine looks great after 63 track days and 44k miles with no measurable wear, except this one oil clearance.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Luns View Post
Having never done an oil clearance measurement, I don't know how big a difference this would make, but I would suggest bypassing the gauge pins.



Just zero your bore gauge to wherever your micrometer ends up from measuring the journal OD. Then the bore gauge just reads the oil clearance directly. If I understand your procedure correctly, you're including two more measurements (the two involving gauge pins), and their associated errors, into your final calculation.



One would hope these errors don't overwhelm the actual measurement in which case you'd get the same result, but if the result turns out different - hopefully closer to spec - I'd go with that.
Thanks. Yeah I asked this on some facebook groups and I got a similar response. I’ll update the original post but it did not make any significant difference. If anything, it confirmed that my measurements were pretty consistent and that some main bearing 3 and 4 are particularly bad.
mkodama is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mkodama For This Useful Post:
Tokay444 (12-27-2024)
Old 12-28-2024, 06:22 PM   #6
Ultramaroon
meow
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 32,309
Thanks: 52,878
Thanked 37,115 Times in 19,250 Posts
Mentioned: 1114 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Do the original bearings show any visible signs of wear? I see the difference between the Toyota and BRZ specs. I'm with Tokay on this. I'll go a step further. Since I first became aware of how much engine speed affects oil temperature, I've quietly assumed that it is a direct result of dumping the same amount of work into a fraction of the oil volume seen in previous generations of journal bearings.

I bet the original bearings were fine,
__________________

Last edited by Ultramaroon; 12-28-2024 at 07:11 PM.
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ultramaroon For This Useful Post:
Tokay444 (12-30-2024)
Old 01-01-2025, 10:50 AM   #7
Opie
Senior Member
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (JDM)
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,992
Thanks: 1,643
Thanked 2,394 Times in 1,023 Posts
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
How are you measuring the ID of the bearings without the engine assembled? Using a micrometer on an uninstalled bearing is your problem. They got to be compressed, installed in the journal to get an accurate measurement. Do it right, use plastigauge like everyone else.
__________________
2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax, 2021 Forester Sport, 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK 5MT (JDM Import) and random 86 chassis rebuilds....
Opie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2025, 02:37 PM   #8
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: 926
Thanked 992 Times in 568 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opie View Post
How are you measuring the ID of the bearings without the engine assembled? Using a micrometer on an uninstalled bearing is your problem. They got to be compressed, installed in the journal to get an accurate measurement. Do it right, use plastigauge like everyone else.
If he compresses them, there will be even more clearance. Plastigauge is for a amateurs who don’t have the correct measuring equipment.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2025, 07:46 PM   #9
Eaton PSI
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Drives: 2013 86
Location: melbourne VIC
Posts: 58
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I had similar issues when assembling my engine.
The ACL race series bearings come in both 0.025 oversize and undersize sets.
I ended up using 1/2 a std set and 1/2 0.025 oversize set to get all clearances good.
Expensive and time consuming getting it all good but it can be done.
Eaton PSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2025, 07:53 PM   #10
Eaton PSI
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Drives: 2013 86
Location: melbourne VIC
Posts: 58
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think the block relaxes after a couple years of heat cycling so they're never quite the same as a new one.
I also had issues with alignment as I removed all the dowels to make it easier to set up on the machine for sleeves. This was a mistake! I ended up having to make offset dowels to get the tunnel to line up true again. A huge amount of work but probably still less than line boring it.
I have all the leftover bearings from my build listed for sale in the australian classifieds section.
Eaton PSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2025, 08:02 PM   #11
Eaton PSI
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Drives: 2013 86
Location: melbourne VIC
Posts: 58
Thanks: 1
Thanked 35 Times in 19 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Another tip for fine tuning clearances.
If the std bearings are to loose and the 0.025 oversize are to tight, you can use one of each shell on a journal which gives you 0.012 clearance increments.
Be very careful if using this trick on main bearings as you may create alignment issues if thick and thin shells end up on opposing sides of the tunnel.
Rod bearings no problem, run the thinner shell in the cap.
Eaton PSI is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Eaton PSI For This Useful Post:
Tokay444 (01-02-2025)
Old 01-04-2025, 06:18 PM   #12
Opie
Senior Member
 
Opie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK (JDM)
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,992
Thanks: 1,643
Thanked 2,394 Times in 1,023 Posts
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
If he compresses them, there will be even more clearance. Plastigauge is for a amateurs who don’t have the correct measuring equipment.
Incorrect, but thanks for trying. Main & rod bearings are slightly larger than the journal, when bearings are seated in the journal the tension from this holds them in place. Then when you set the crankshaft in place and torque the block halves to the correct value you will get the true clearance. Anything else is just guessing.

It's no wonder there are so many failures on "garage" rebuilds for this engine...I'm still 0 for 150+
__________________
2020 GMC Canyon Denali Duramax, 2021 Forester Sport, 2000 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK 5MT (JDM Import) and random 86 chassis rebuilds....
Opie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2025, 11:52 AM   #13
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,703
Thanks: 926
Thanked 992 Times in 568 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
lol. “uSe PlAsTiGaGe! yOuR dOiNg It WrOnG”
The guy has actual measurements with high quality direct and indirect precision measuring tools. Why on earth would he use Platigauge? It has its place. That place isn’t here.

Last edited by Tokay444; 01-05-2025 at 12:03 PM.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2025, 03:53 PM   #14
NoHaveMSG
Senior Member
 
NoHaveMSG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: Crapcan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 11,401
Thanks: 18,624
Thanked 16,659 Times in 7,549 Posts
Mentioned: 110 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Plastigauge isn’t perfect but given the OP’s measurements I would have used it to double check myself in that situation. At least one rod or main would have been plenty to verify.
__________________
"Experience is the hardest kind of teacher. It gives you the test first and the lesson afterward." -Oscar Wilde.
NoHaveMSG is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Main bearing location size? tekno Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 1 06-10-2021 08:08 AM
Throwout Bearing Clearance question? Kyle2 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 11 07-26-2020 09:49 PM
more proof the #3 main bearing needs modified. solidsnake11 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 10 11-30-2019 01:43 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.