|
Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
BRZ Wannabee
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2013 Limited BRZ
Location: Worcestor, MA
Posts: 94
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Ram Air Intake; Scale MAF?
I'm going to be making a custom ram air intake using the stock air intake. I already have a drop in filter and I've heard that this alone can make the engine run rich. Do I need to make adjustments to MAF scaling being that the faster I drive the more air & thus oxygen will be shoved into the intake? I'm on the OFT stage 2 tune, so I'll be data logging both before and after installation.
Thanks, -Adam |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | Spuds (07-26-2017) |
![]() |
#3 |
Huge E85 fan!
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: 2016 Scion FRS
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 1,850
Thanks: 539
Thanked 1,010 Times in 605 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Do the custom intake then run with it for a while, you can't hurt anything. Use Torque Pro to watch your LTFT and AFR and see how it looks. If it's way off, rescale the MAF.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,563
Thanks: 26,526
Thanked 12,604 Times in 6,243 Posts
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Theoretically I would say no, as you aren't changing the shape of the box itself and the filter should slow air down quite a bit and damp out some of the turbulent effects. But I think I remember reading that even removing the front air dam under the factory snorkel messes with stuff at high speed so maybe the filter does less than I thought.
Problem is if you do need to rescale due to ram air effects, your scale will need to be speed dependant. I don't think the factory ecu supports that. One thing you could try is to put some baffling inside the intake to transfer dynamic pressure to static pressure before the filter, as that's what you are really after if you still have a filter at all. Just keep in mind that the front of the car does the same thing in stock form. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,563
Thanks: 26,526
Thanked 12,604 Times in 6,243 Posts
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Drives: FR-S Whiteout
Location: California
Posts: 2,863
Thanks: 1,808
Thanked 791 Times in 611 Posts
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Intent > Content
cowardice is the mother of cruelty. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
The thing is that you need to be going at much higher than legal speeds to make the ram air effect worthwhile. The OEM system is designed to reduce turbulence as it improves airflow. It's possible that a ram air system may reduce flow until pressure is significant enough to overcome this, but your talking 80-100mph+
I'm not sure a degree or 2 of improvement of IAT is worthwhile the trade off for worse flow. For FI I can see the possible benefits of this type of system, but it's less of a ram air intake in that regard anyway. The only reason the MAF voltage output would change based on speed and RPM rather than just RPM alone is turbulence. If you had smooth airflow you would just get higher voltage outputs if you flowed more air. That doesn't require any extra work.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,563
Thanks: 26,526
Thanked 12,604 Times in 6,243 Posts
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If you assume airspeed through the filter is negligible, then you are correct. In this instance turbulence would not matter either. However, if airspeed through the filter is significant, then the air coming out of the air box would have momentum that varies by speed in a ram air setup. In a straight tube, this would not matter, but the collection point looks like it is immediately after a bend in the stock air box. Because of this bend, varying momentum will vary the amount of air actually crossing the hot wire.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
BRZ Wannabee
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2013 Limited BRZ
Location: Worcestor, MA
Posts: 94
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
dang, you guys all bring up some really good points... Ignoring the possibility of rescaling the MAF, I think I'll route the ram air tube to end a couple inches away from the stock snorkel so it can breathe normal under low speed conditions. I will shove a bunch of shortened straws in the end of the ram air tube to promote laminar flow like we did back in fluids class haha. It would make sense that turbulent flow would cause the most issues. I wanted to widen the inner diameter of the snorkel to 3" to match that of the ram air tube though...I might just increase the flare on the end of the stock snorkel so that it can capture the rammed laminar flow. Either option will decrease the snorkel's "velocity stack" aspects but would allow larger volumetric flow. This is all before the filter so it shouldn't cause any serious issues?
I like the discussion going on here, and I have a couple weeks before the flexible ram air intake hose ships in from China haha. I think the biggest issue is turbulent air flow...but if I can overcome that then we might end up with a more efficient system. Last edited by majixmatrix; 07-28-2017 at 03:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Have you thought about placement of the opening? I'm not up on these thing but it would make sense you would need it in a high pressure area and not a low pressure area. This would then help with calculations on what speed you actually expect to see positive pressure.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | solidONE (07-29-2017) |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 143
Thanks: 22
Thanked 44 Times in 34 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Yes re-scaling will help a lot actually. After using VGIs tool my car runs much smoother and trims are all consistent. Trims were about 15% out of wack and AFRs weren't consistent before the rescale.
I also have all of the wind tunnel data you will ever need for the placement you are looking for. ![]() Sent from my Galaxy S8+ using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Tags |
intake, maf, ram air, scale |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perrin CAI MAF Scale | Kodename47 | Software Tuning | 14 | 11-12-2015 02:35 PM |
FRS 1:18 scale model | FrankAR15 | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 6 | 10-19-2015 12:23 PM |
Scale models | The359 | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 1 | 06-09-2013 05:10 PM |
Scale FR-S | Sloober | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 9 | 11-04-2012 07:50 PM |