follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-22-2019, 08:41 AM   #8737
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,188 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would resolve the issue instead of trying to put a band-aid on it. Your RPM should not be dipping and your fuel trims should not be off.
i idle around 700RPM once car is warmed up with no issues.
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2019, 03:25 PM   #8738
tzbang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: 2013 GT86
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 109
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 View Post
That may not be the stock idler pulley, I have never heard of Toyota dealer supplying this kit before, perhaps they made a few revisions to try to help solve any belt issues. Especially since they said they had issues before, the normal stock idler is 70mm daim 27mm wide, the dorman i listed before is 76mm diam and 33mm wide. but your measurement in the picture shows it is 27mm wide? as you are starting on the 5mm?
LoL oh man I hadn't noticed the measure had slipped! How embarrassing. You're right it's 27mm.
tzbang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-25-2019, 03:37 PM   #8739
tzbang
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: 2013 GT86
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 109
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Has anyone had difficulty reattaching the fuel line that runs under the manifold to the fuel rails? I can't push in the blue tab for the life of me. Is there some trick to it or is it a force fit? I don't want to break it :-(

UPDATE:Ok so for anyone reading this, the trick really is not to install the injectors/fuel rail onto the manifold first. I removed them and so I could rotate and move it into position easier for the clip to engage. Then rotated the assembly back onto the manifold. I used a clean plastic baggy to put the fuel rail + inj into whilst connecting the fuel pass through line so I didn't get any dirt into the injector.

Last edited by tzbang; 11-28-2019 at 06:30 PM.
tzbang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2019, 03:03 AM   #8740
kev0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Drives: '14
Location: Midwest
Posts: 485
Thanks: 246
Thanked 99 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Anyone have a spare bypass vacuum actuator sitting around for sale before I purchase one from JBP?

kev0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2019, 09:44 AM   #8741
kev0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Drives: '14
Location: Midwest
Posts: 485
Thanks: 246
Thanked 99 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Also, as you guys may know that I have been plagued with problems ever since installing this SC.

What I don't understand is why my fuel trims normalize after engine is warmed up (about 6 minutes of driving). I monitor my fuel trims live with the ecutek bluetooth program on my head unit and its maxed out when engine is cold, but my RPM's will drop down for a second and then go back up, and that's when my fuel trims normalize. After the 'rpm drop', all is good. It's only the cold starts that is causing my fuel trims to go up.

I still to this day, after hundreds of dollar spent on reinstalling the kit on and off, replacing AFR sensor, intake pipe, cannot figure out what the hell is going on.

I suspect a vacuum leak as well, but that does not explain why my fuel trims suddenly begin to look fine after the engine warmup. It's not like the vacuum leak magically disappears after a few minutes of driving. This has left my tuner and I scratching our heads as to what is wrong.


Also, I've seen this thread about a leaking bypass: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...postcount=2368

How can I test this for our kit? Where is our vacuum hose for our bypass that I can pinch to test my bypass actuator?

Sorry for the stupid questions, you guys are probably all rolling your eyes at me whenever I ask a question, but I'm really new to modifying cars and I would really like to start doing things myself instead of paying hundreds to visit my mechanic every time.

Last edited by kev0; 11-28-2019 at 09:59 AM.
kev0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2019, 12:01 AM   #8742
sam69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: GT 86
Location: australia
Posts: 369
Thanks: 84
Thanked 121 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kev0 View Post
Also, as you guys may know that I have been plagued with problems ever since installing this SC.

What I don't understand is why my fuel trims normalize after engine is warmed up (about 6 minutes of driving). I monitor my fuel trims live with the ecutek bluetooth program on my head unit and its maxed out when engine is cold, but my RPM's will drop down for a second and then go back up, and that's when my fuel trims normalize. After the 'rpm drop', all is good. It's only the cold starts that is causing my fuel trims to go up.

I still to this day, after hundreds of dollar spent on reinstalling the kit on and off, replacing AFR sensor, intake pipe, cannot figure out what the hell is going on.

I suspect a vacuum leak as well, but that does not explain why my fuel trims suddenly begin to look fine after the engine warmup. It's not like the vacuum leak magically disappears after a few minutes of driving. This has left my tuner and I scratching our heads as to what is wrong.


Also, I've seen this thread about a leaking bypass: http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...postcount=2368

How can I test this for our kit? Where is our vacuum hose for our bypass that I can pinch to test my bypass actuator?

Sorry for the stupid questions, you guys are probably all rolling your eyes at me whenever I ask a question, but I'm really new to modifying cars and I would really like to start doing things myself instead of paying hundreds to visit my mechanic every time.
Have you checked both end plates on the supercharger are not leaking as these are/where only a metal to metal seal and can leak air.

A good flange sealant could be the go used sparingly.
sam69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2019, 12:07 AM   #8743
kev0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Drives: '14
Location: Midwest
Posts: 485
Thanks: 246
Thanked 99 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam69 View Post
Have you checked both end plates on the supercharger are not leaking as these are/where only a metal to metal seal and can leak air.

A good flange sealant could be the go used sparingly.
Just did. I see pcv blowby on it. A lot. Same as my bypass actuator. Going to get the actuator replaced and have the metal-to-metal plates rtv'd up.

Anyone know the harm in having PCV blowby going in the intake valves..? I'd suspect that is what happens when there is a lot of pcv blowby on the back of my supercharger. So much that I see a bit in the clear tube on the bypass actuator. Wtf? It's causing misfirings during coldstarts.

Last edited by kev0; 11-29-2019 at 11:20 AM.
kev0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2019, 12:45 AM   #8744
sroby
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: 2015 Firestorm 08/05/15
Location: Dallas Ga
Posts: 320
Thanks: 376
Thanked 122 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Blow by causing misfire

Quote:
Originally Posted by kev0 View Post
Just did. I see pcv blowby on it. A lot. Same as my bypass actuator. Going to get the actuator replaced and have the metal-to-metal plates rtv'd up.

Anyone know the harm in having PCV blowby going in the intake valves..? I'd suspect that is what happens when there is a lot of pcv blowby on the back of my supercharger. So much that I see a bit in the clear tube on the bypass actuator. Wtf? It's causing misfirings during coldstarts.
Kevo mine did the same thing. That’s when Jon Bond and I became customer paying friends. He is the best in the buiss on these units.
Even after a rebuild take your elbow off and if your using his blue dye turbin oil, it will be saturated. When I pulled my intake before the rebuild it was coated with front gear drive blue oil. Yes it will accumulate enough to eventually foul a plug and cause a misfire code . He has spent a lot of time with there engineering side and only to fall on there def ears. There is an engineering flaw in the 210 series. And new 210 S series, these units will use oil. The S or X is just rotor pacs that are now powder coated to improve the efficiency mean less drag. They haven’t engineered a damn thing in so much as having the front seals to close to the front gear drive they get over heated and swell thus causing oil to blow by the seal lip and into the rotor pac where it gets crammed down the intake.
They are really pushing the sales of these units now on the Jeep crowd.
I’d be interested to see if the Jeep folks are experiencing the same type of oil consumption. Those units look a little different is appearance , but if they are not reengineered to have a longer clearance from seals to actual front drive gears they will have the same issue, I had my entire unit rebuild from the drive gear box front to the entire rotor pacs, right at 1300.00 with a 3 yr warranty but I think he has since stopped the long warranty process over at Jon Bond performance. It’s a shame as they make a fine compressor noise and build power excellently . No body state side to really service them other than Jon. Be a good deal to see how the other owners are farring out. It’s small and compact good boost.

Last edited by sroby; 11-30-2019 at 10:40 AM. Reason: 1
sroby is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sroby For This Useful Post:
kev0 (11-30-2019), LOJOKO (01-11-2020)
Old 11-30-2019, 01:51 AM   #8745
kev0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Drives: '14
Location: Midwest
Posts: 485
Thanks: 246
Thanked 99 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sroby View Post
Kevo mine did the same thing. That’s when Jon Bond and I became customer paying friends. He is the best in the buiss on these units.
Even after a rebuild take your elbow off and if your using his blue dye turbin oil, it will be saturated. When I pulled my intake before the rebuild it was coated with front gear drive blue oil. Yes it will accumulate enough to eventually foul a plug and cause a misfire code . He has spent a lot of time with there engineering side and only to fall on there def ears. There is an engineering flaw in the 210 series. And new 210 S series, these units will use oil. The S or X is just rotor pacs that are now powder coated to improve the efficiency mean less drag. They haven’t engineered a damn thing in so much as having the front seals to close to the front gear drive they get over heated and swell thus causing oil to blow by the seal lip and into the rotor pac where it gets cramped down the intake.
They are really pushing the sales of these units now on the Jeep crowd.
I’d be interested to see if the Jeep folks are experiencing the same type of oil consumption. Those units look a little different is appearance , but if they are not reengineered to have a longer clearance from seals to actual front drive gears they will have the same issue, I had my entire unit rebuild from the drive gear box front to the entire rotor pacs, right at 1300.00 with a 3 yr warranty but I think he has since stopped the long warranty process over at Jon Bond performance. It’s a shame as they make a fine compressor noise and build power excellently . No body state side to really service them other than Jon. Be a good deal to see how the other owners are farring out. It’s small and compact good boost.
Very good info. Thank you

I will send it to JBP as well and have him install new bearings and replace my bypass actuator. I cannot afford a full rebuild at the time, so I'm hoping that the new bypass and bearing will prevent or slow down the blowby from leaking.
kev0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2019, 07:06 PM   #8746
sroby
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Drives: 2015 Firestorm 08/05/15
Location: Dallas Ga
Posts: 320
Thanks: 376
Thanked 122 Times in 76 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by kev0 View Post
Very good info. Thank you

I will send it to JBP as well and have him install new bearings and replace my bypass actuator. I cannot afford a full rebuild at the time, so I'm hoping that the new bypass and bearing will prevent or slow down the blowby from leaking.
It’s a real pisser because these are nice compact effect units. Codename47 in England has been running his for years. Just wish (Bullet) sprintex would address this issue. If it’s any conciliation Jon Bond was telling me the hellcat chargers are shit as well they have there own issues. This guy being a mechanical engineer in this industry for over 30 yrs I’ll believe his authority of a sales clerk for a major corporation.
sroby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 06:10 AM   #8747
sam69
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: GT 86
Location: australia
Posts: 369
Thanks: 84
Thanked 121 Times in 77 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Was one of the reasons along with heat soak that I developed the water jacket idea, it helped big time with the issues you have raised .

I'm now in the process atm of developing a new custom built laminova / intercooler core for the manifold that replaces the restrictive factory job and I think it is going to work very well .
sam69 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sam69 For This Useful Post:
Kenny_LongWrench (12-02-2019), sroby (12-01-2019)
Old 12-01-2019, 08:05 PM   #8748
DGMlJDlBRZ
Senior Member
 
DGMlJDlBRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 2014 DGM BRZ
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 323
Thanks: 189
Thanked 190 Times in 84 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Hey guys, wanted to get your guys' input about my SC and the carb legal tune.


So I have the Sprintex 210 Intercooled SC (SPS Stage 2 if that even matters), along with their CARB tune. Basically I had to email them my stock tune, they modified it, sent it back to me, and I uploaded it to the car using the tablet (which is pretty much the same to the OFT). Runs great, never had any issues.



I'm planning on parting out the car. So my question is, would the new owner of the SC be able to use the carb tune that's currently running with the SC, which is basically my stock tune modified for the SC, or would the new owner have to send Sprintex their stock tune and have it modified it for their own car?


Figured I'd take a shot asking here first before contacting Sprintex directly, which can sometimes be a hit or miss lol
DGMlJDlBRZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 08:06 PM   #8749
jflogerzi
Senior Member
 
jflogerzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Series 10 6MT FR-S
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 5,529
Thanks: 1,999
Thanked 2,013 Times in 1,457 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Guessing they will need to save their own ECU file and send to sprintex. Not sure of there would be a cost and if now that tablet device is locked to your car

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk
__________________
2013 Series 10 FRS #553
RCE T2's, SPC LCAs -4/2.6 camber
JDL 4-2-1 EL, FP and OP, Tuned by Zach@CSG on e85
RR Wilwood Front/Rear Sport BBK, Motul 600 Fluid
ARC-8 17x9 SX2 GTs 245s/Koing 17x8 v730's 225's
jflogerzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2019, 11:34 PM   #8750
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,188 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by sam69 View Post
Was one of the reasons along with heat soak that I developed the water jacket idea, it helped big time with the issues you have raised .

I'm now in the process atm of developing a new custom built laminova / intercooler core for the manifold that replaces the restrictive factory job and I think it is going to work very well .
Sounds very intriguing. I thought you sold your sprintex?
Im using wmi and has pretty much completely eliminated heat-soak I paired that with a perrin cai and completely gold heat the wrapped entire intake piping and a seibon fa hood with the air vents and air scoop. Keeps IATs at or below ambient pretty much all the time.
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
2 whp better than n/a e85, 2 whp? you're an idiot., 2screwsbetterthan0screw, 65 whp better than na e85, bspt fittings ftl, hate u all me no have sc, im just here for the tags, inorite!, it's no turbo but, only big numbers matter, screwyou, whine sexier than turbo, whines_more_than_your_gf, wts grey market butthurt.


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Innovative ideas to increase interior storage capacity? swift996 Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 0 01-30-2013 10:45 PM
AVO vs Innovative diss7 Forced Induction 32 01-21-2013 06:15 PM
Not another need to drive topic Sargy Mid-Atlantic 5 11-27-2012 12:18 PM
Technical topic sub-forums OrbitalEllipses Site Announcements / Questions / Issues 1 07-17-2012 11:38 PM
Can you close the topic please? Standardsuspension Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 14 06-26-2012 05:14 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.