follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2019, 09:03 PM   #1
rennlistuser3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ
Location: Somewhere in the world
Posts: 333
Thanks: 366
Thanked 177 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Is weight no longer an issue in sports cars?

Someone please enlighten me. I feel like I'm missing something here.

I'm following latest sports cars releases and aside from very few exceptions (Alpine A110) almost none of the sports cars coming to market today seem to even bother about weight at all.

It's startling me that the latest release of 911 992 is a pretty heavy car yet almost no one is even mentioning this in the reviews at all, it's like being a heavy sports car is no problem in today's world.

I'm in the school of thought of lighter sports car is better. I can certainly feel the difference between 1450 kg (3196 lbs) sports car and a 1250 kg (2755 lbs) sports car. Now sports cars are more like 1600 kg (3527 lbs)! That's the weight of small SUV!

So honestly am I missing something here? am I the only one who thinks like this? what's up?
rennlistuser3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rennlistuser3 For This Useful Post:
JIM THEO (01-26-2019), WolfpackS2k (01-28-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:10 PM   #2
RyMi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Drives: 2001 Honda Accord
Location: IN
Posts: 27
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I totally agree. Part of it has had to do with all the crash standards and stuff, being more things on the car and the way cars are constructed for impact. I think it also has to do with cars just getting bigger as companies want to make cars have more space due to consumer demand.

In part, people just don’t really have an interest in small cars anymore :/ or they at least aren’t buying a whole lot of them new




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RyMi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RyMi For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (01-26-2019), Tcoat (01-25-2019), why? (01-28-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:11 PM   #3
RyMi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Drives: 2001 Honda Accord
Location: IN
Posts: 27
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I totally agree. Small cars that feel more like toys are so awesome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RyMi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RyMi For This Useful Post:
p1l0t (01-27-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:11 PM   #4
fatoni
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Things change and the evaluation of a car should be done in the context of its generation. Weight is as important as ever but it's just a means to an end. Feel is usually what matters and weight helps but other things improve feel too.
__________________
Drive upgrades. Don't buy them.
fatoni is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fatoni For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (01-25-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:43 PM   #5
TommyW
Senior Member
 
TommyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,491
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I went from a 73 911s to a 996 Twin Turbo and was blown away at the difference in feel with the added weight. I think power is more popular than lightness these days which is unfortunate. I love my 86 and would only replace it with an Alpha 4c. At some point
TommyW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TommyW For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (01-28-2019), DAEMANO (01-27-2019), why? (01-28-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:46 PM   #6
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Because consumers want, air, PS, no noise, and every other creature comfort known to man, they want the image of a sports car with the luxury and refinement of a luxo barge.

Most people who buy a sports car do it for the image.

In my "sports car world" the standard twins are porky.

Sports cars to me should be RWD, a convertible or coupe, 2 doors, manual transmission and light, under 1200kg at least, with a great power to weight ratio.

Lotus Elise light.

Alfa 4C light.

MX5 light.

Every thing seems to be evolving into fat GT cars.

And everyone is calling fat GT cars sports cars.

The term "sports cars" is thrown around at everything now, so much so it's lossing its true meaning.

Hell, I've heard people call Honda Civics and Golf GTI's sports cars.

The world has gone insane.......
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (01-28-2019), DAEMANO (01-27-2019), daiheadjai (01-29-2019), DarkPira7e (01-28-2019), extrashaky (01-26-2019), gravitylover (01-26-2019), Tcoat (01-25-2019), Tristor (02-01-2019), tvrbob86 (01-26-2019), why? (01-28-2019), WolfpackS2k (01-28-2019), wparsons (02-01-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 09:51 PM   #7
Leonardo
Country Boy 4 Life
 
Leonardo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 19' & 06' Ridgelines, 13' FR-S
Location: EUGENE
Posts: 5,228
Thanks: 6,719
Thanked 5,291 Times in 2,720 Posts
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I miss my ap1.
__________________
<img src=https://www.ft86club.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=2239&pictureid=11508 border=0 alt= />


I LIKE TIRES!
Leonardo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 10:01 PM   #8
rennlistuser3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ
Location: Somewhere in the world
Posts: 333
Thanks: 366
Thanked 177 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyW View Post
I went from a 73 911s to a 996 Twin Turbo and was blown away at the difference in feel with the added weight. I think power is more popular than lightness these days which is unfortunate. I love my 86 and would only replace it with an Alpha 4c. At some point
but which one would you say you enjoyed more if I may ask? the 73? or the 996?
rennlistuser3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 10:07 PM   #9
rennlistuser3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ
Location: Somewhere in the world
Posts: 333
Thanks: 366
Thanked 177 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyMi View Post
I totally agree. Part of it has had to do with all the crash standards and stuff, being more things on the car and the way cars are constructed for impact. I think it also has to do with cars just getting bigger as companies want to make cars have more space due to consumer demand.

In part, people just don’t really have an interest in small cars anymore :/ or they at least aren’t buying a whole lot of them new




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What puzzles me here is the Alpine A110

It does not have cramped interior or anything and it does comply with modern safety and amenities and it's even lighter than the twins!

Granted of course that I do fully approve of the twins (I happily own one now) but some might argue the BRZ is a small car with small power and mechanicals and breaks and all that. To that argument you can point at the Alpine A110 which is a fast car by modern standards so what's the excuse now for everyone else building a sports car?

Today, all I can think of is the Twins, Alpine A110, Mazda MX-5, some light hot hatches such as the Ford Fiesta ST, Lotus Elise, and that Alpha 4c or something rather. It's a short list of cars.

Other than this, everything out there now is SUV weight territory.
rennlistuser3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 10:11 PM   #10
RyMi
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Drives: 2001 Honda Accord
Location: IN
Posts: 27
Thanks: 8
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rennlistuser3 View Post
What puzzles me here is the Alpine A110



It does not have cramped interior or anything and it does comply with modern safety and amenities and it's even lighter than the twins!



Granted of course that I do fully approve of the twins (I happily own one now) but some might argue the BRZ is a small car with small power and mechanicals and breaks and all that. To that argument you can point at the Alpine A110 which is a fast car by modern standards so what's the excuse now for everyone else building a sports car?



Today, all I can think of is the Twins, Alpine A110, Mazda MX-5, some light hot hatches such as the Ford Fiesta ST, Lotus Elise, and that Alpha 4c or something rather. It's a short list of cars.



Other than this, everything out there now is SUV weight territory.


Yeah haha. The small enthusiast sports cars are really far and few between nowadays


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RyMi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2019, 10:15 PM   #11
TommyW
Senior Member
 
TommyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,491
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rennlistuser3 View Post
but which one would you say you enjoyed more if I may ask? the 73? or the 996?
Man that’s a tough one. 2 different animals. The sound of the 73S was just incredible I never turned the radio on. The TT was a great GT car with gobs of power but somewhat disconnected. If I could have 1 back it would be the ‘73 hands down.
TommyW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TommyW For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (01-28-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 10:28 PM   #12
Sapphireho
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Sapphireho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: '15 ultramarine
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,192
Thanks: 5,451
Thanked 18,240 Times in 8,609 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
My lotus is about 1950 lbs., My '77 911s Targa about 2450 lbs., Twin at about 2800. All that tech and safety adds weight.
Sapphireho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Sapphireho For This Useful Post:
Adam_L (01-28-2019), Tristor (02-01-2019), why? (01-28-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 10:37 PM   #13
rennlistuser3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ
Location: Somewhere in the world
Posts: 333
Thanks: 366
Thanked 177 Times in 107 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyW View Post
Man that’s a tough one. 2 different animals. The sound of the 73S was just incredible I never turned the radio on. The TT was a great GT car with gobs of power but somewhat disconnected. If I could have 1 back it would be the ‘73 hands down.
We're like minded

I just feel that fun cars should be very mechanical and analogue. I'll save the SUVs for general commuting when I'm not in the mood to drive.
rennlistuser3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rennlistuser3 For This Useful Post:
TommyW (01-25-2019)
Old 01-25-2019, 11:00 PM   #14
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rennlistuser3 View Post
What puzzles me here is the Alpine A110

It does not have cramped interior or anything and it does comply with modern safety and amenities and it's even lighter than the twins!

Granted of course that I do fully approve of the twins (I happily own one now) but some might argue the BRZ is a small car with small power and mechanicals and breaks and all that. To that argument you can point at the Alpine A110 which is a fast car by modern standards so what's the excuse now for everyone else building a sports car?

Today, all I can think of is the Twins, Alpine A110, Mazda MX-5, some light hot hatches such as the Ford Fiesta ST, Lotus Elise, and that Alpha 4c or something rather. It's a short list of cars.

Other than this, everything out there now is SUV weight territory.
A big part of it is price. They could build the 86 with half the weight but then it would be a $100,000 car and nobody could afford it. The really lightweight cars are expensive for a reason and comparing them to an entry level coupe is not apples to apples.
As said the modern equipment which either people demand or the government requires unfortunately adds weight. The manufacturers try to make every car (even the SUVs and pickup trucks) as light as possible to meet their emissions and mileage requirements. Then another department requires even more stringent safety devices which add weight. On top of both of those they still have to meet a price point which keeps the vehicle competitive which in turn restricts the materials they can use. It is a balancing act that they struggle with on all vehicles all the time. Our engineers are tasked by our customers to shave as much weight as possible off our rotors each time we quote and it is truly amazing the ways they can come up with to cut a few ounces but maintain or even improve function with each upgrade. If we didn't have the tech we have now modern cars would be even heavier than they are!
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Dadhawk (01-26-2019), daiheadjai (01-29-2019), Ganthrithor (01-29-2019), krayzie (01-29-2019), rennlistuser3 (01-25-2019), Sapphireho (01-25-2019), Tristor (02-01-2019), why? (01-28-2019)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can you name any FWD sports cars? paulca Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 255 07-09-2014 08:26 AM
sports cars -- power to weight comparison jack43 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 14 05-15-2014 12:31 PM
Two new RWD Sports cars to join FR-S? rcm47 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 44 08-14-2013 02:43 AM
The weight issue mickey177 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 24 07-27-2012 08:47 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.