|
Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-14-2014, 09:50 PM | #15 | |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Clearly he just wants to buy a built block. One that comes in at 9.0:1 . What I am saying is that a 2L at that static comp using a gtx2867r is a great combination; because the motor running at that comp means the turbo will be boosting harder; and it's more efficient when boosting harder. So that comp and a gtx2867r end up being a great combo. Run high static comp, the motor is more efficient. Because the motor is more efficient it means it's less of a restriction. Because it's less of a restriction it can ingest more air. This means to make the same power the turbo is operating at a lower boost level. This isn't necessarily a good thing. Look at any modern turbo and note where the choke line is at given pressure ratios. Where the choke line extends it's furtherst to the right should be the target pressure ratio. This means that running lower static comp so that the turbo is operating at its ideal pressure ratio will result in optimum power. That's why people running a gtx28 at 7psi will say the turbo will choke in the top end. Look where the choke line and therefore the efficentcy zones at that pressure ratio on the comp map and you'll see why. Now if they ran lower static comp, then the turbo can operate at a more ideal pressure ratio; and the setup will make more power with the same turbo. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Manji For This Useful Post: | AVodka14 (07-14-2014) |
07-14-2014, 09:52 PM | #16 |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Also, your comment about lower static comp will result in more usable torque is incorrect. Because he is knock governed by pump fuel.
Lowering the static comp would allow him to ramp up a small turbo very aggressively. Something you can't do at 12.5:1 on pump fuel. |
07-14-2014, 09:59 PM | #17 |
Boosted
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sideways
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Posts: 2,377
Thanks: 388
Thanked 716 Times in 414 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Thanks for all of the replies guys. Lots of good info here. @Manji do you believe I can achieve 400whp with the GTX2867R on my compression efficiently?
I've already got the 9:1 compression
__________________
Nismo 370Z 300whp -> FR-S Turbo 450whp on E85 -> Z06 Corvette 500whp
|
07-14-2014, 10:04 PM | #18 | |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If its a stock head it'll probably need 1.2 bar. Either way, 1.0 - 1.2 bar are ideal operating pressures for a gtx2867r. That where the efficency islands are at their widest. |
|
07-14-2014, 10:08 PM | #19 |
Boosted
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sideways
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Posts: 2,377
Thanks: 388
Thanked 716 Times in 414 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
That's about 15psi, are you serious? That's crazy.
__________________
Nismo 370Z 300whp -> FR-S Turbo 450whp on E85 -> Z06 Corvette 500whp
|
07-14-2014, 10:21 PM | #20 |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'll also add that one thing I have noticed about forums is there seems to be this obsession with "High comp low boost for the win"
Probably because one person said it once, and the rest are just jumping on the bandwagon. In the real world, with real world limitations like pump fuel, you'll find the opposite is true. I'm not saying that high comp is bad. I'm saying too many people are looking at their turbo builds through NA-knowledge-tinted sunglasses. Lets take a practical example. Using this motor and a gtx2867r (yes I love this turbo) On 7psi making 300whp at 12.5:1, that pretty much all your going to get. Knock limited. Which in part is caused by the turbo operating at this level inefficeintly, but mostly because of the static comp. (This is why a bigger turbo at this level achieves marginally more power, as it's landing in a better efficency zone at that point. But if you run the same motor at LOWER static comp, meaning the gtx28 has to BOOST harder (that doesn't mean is working harder, work should be judged by effiency zones) it will make 400whp at 14psi and end up at the same efficency zone. (So IMO similar work load on the turbo) You also wont be governed by knock as you could spike the mid range up higher if you wanted to. A 2 litre motor, running a gtx28 frame turbo at 400whp, at 9.0:1 static comp will NOT have poor throttle response. |
07-14-2014, 10:25 PM | #21 |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Because you're no longer near the knock threshold, you can get more aggressive with the tune, which is where a lot of throttle response really comes from.
You can't get that aggressive on pump fuel & 300whp & 12.5:1 c/r. |
07-14-2014, 10:30 PM | #22 | |
Boosted
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sideways
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Posts: 2,377
Thanks: 388
Thanked 716 Times in 414 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
Nismo 370Z 300whp -> FR-S Turbo 450whp on E85 -> Z06 Corvette 500whp
|
|
07-14-2014, 10:37 PM | #23 | |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I can't really divulge too much about it. But its the head causing the restriction that is governing that boost level. NA cams are often not very good FI cams. I'm not familar with precision turbos at all, but even a tiny gtx2860r will hit 350whp at 20psi. But I'm point to the head, not the turbo. |
|
07-14-2014, 10:44 PM | #24 | |
Boosted
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sideways
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Posts: 2,377
Thanks: 388
Thanked 716 Times in 414 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If I'm not getting close to 400whp then I'll cam it out. Edit: I take that back. Cams are barely out, if at all, for this car. Not to mention they wouldn't be cheap since we need 4. And you have to pull the motor to install. Sounds like a ~$3000 job to me.
__________________
Nismo 370Z 300whp -> FR-S Turbo 450whp on E85 -> Z06 Corvette 500whp
|
|
07-14-2014, 10:51 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: 2013 BRZ satin white pearl sportech
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,813
Thanks: 842
Thanked 911 Times in 576 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Pte5858 and I've hit higher than that on lesser quality fuel
__________________
2013 SWP BRZ sportech. 11.11sec@129.01mph, 511whp on e70. FullBlown base kit, FullBlown built 9.5:1 engine, GTX3076R GEN2 turbo, 1700cc Bosch injectors, FullBlown flex fuel kit, FullBlown radiator and oil cooler, FullBlown custom 3" dual exit exhaust, act xtreme clutch, whiteline diff and subframe inserts, BC Racing coilovers, hotchkiss 18mm rear sway, is300 3.73 differential ... Never finished
|
07-14-2014, 10:58 PM | #26 |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You don't have to pull the motor to put cams in.
All the main camshaft manufacturers are putting their efforts into developing FI cams at the moment; due to the disappointed results from NA cams. Early next year there will be some good options coming to market. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Manji For This Useful Post: | Synack (07-14-2014) |
07-14-2014, 10:59 PM | #27 | |
Boosted
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Sideways
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Posts: 2,377
Thanks: 388
Thanked 716 Times in 414 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Were your results on 9:1 compression?
__________________
Nismo 370Z 300whp -> FR-S Turbo 450whp on E85 -> Z06 Corvette 500whp
|
|
07-15-2014, 12:08 AM | #28 |
Stig's dark passenger
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FR-S
Location: I work abroad
Posts: 724
Thanks: 60
Thanked 316 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Low compression? | Venator | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 4 | 06-17-2014 10:37 AM |
Why aren't some concerned about putting a turbo on a high compression motor? | dave77 | Forced Induction | 50 | 01-13-2014 02:22 AM |
Dynosty Tuned FR-S yields 355WHP with GTX28 Turbo and E85 | Hal@Dynosty | Forced Induction | 14 | 12-21-2013 03:49 AM |
Low Compression - 10:1 // 9:1 | 1086 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 12 | 12-13-2013 05:46 PM |
Compression ratio 12.5:1. Bye-bye Super charger & Turbo build? | fred_boosted | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 215 | 12-12-2011 07:23 PM |