follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-04-2015, 08:10 AM   #379
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Thanks. I did do a full read before write and waited more than 15 secs everytime but definitely sounds like it might be the pins.

Great thread man.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sportsguy83 For This Useful Post:
steve99 (06-04-2015)
Old 06-11-2015, 02:30 AM   #380
aagun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 86
Location: uae
Posts: 403
Thanks: 202
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
can any one help find J rom logcfg.txt
aagun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 02:50 AM   #381
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by aagun View Post
can any one help find J rom logcfg.txt
the guy you need is @Td-d he should be able to give you a list of ecu ram addresses for your J series rom he will need to know which rom eg A02J then you can substitute thoe ram addresses into a G series logcfg.txt to make a J series logcfg.txt as scaling should be same.
best to emial him from www.romraider.com forum he is moderator their.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 01:33 PM   #382
B-R-Z
I love peanut butter
 
B-R-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ Limited
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 428
Thanked 584 Times in 349 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
Hey Steve, I went into romraider last night and was thinking of enabling FF shift option. When I use the RR def included with the roms, the option is not there. However, when I use the oft def, it appears. Is it not safe to edit rom when not using RR def? Using b01c 91 uel ROM.
B-R-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 01:55 PM   #383
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-R-Z View Post
Hey Steve, I went into romraider last night and was thinking of enabling FF shift option. When I use the RR def included with the roms, the option is not there. However, when I use the oft def, it appears. Is it not safe to edit rom when not using RR def? Using b01c 91 uel ROM.
The B01C OFT tunes are not cal ID hacked so both standard and OFT definitions are compatible. If you're using the OFT ROMs then the LC and FFS coding is there so use whichever definition gives you visibility of the parameters.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2015, 09:32 PM   #384
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-R-Z View Post
Hey Steve, I went into romraider last night and was thinking of enabling FF shift option. When I use the RR def included with the roms, the option is not there. However, when I use the oft def, it appears. Is it not safe to edit rom when not using RR def? Using b01c 91 uel ROM.
+1 on what @Kodename47 said.
lc ffs is a patch to rom code so only oft defs will have the tables to adjust parameters.

make sure you only have one def linked in romraider as it might pick the wrong def if they are for same rom.

make sure your using oft v2defs for v2 tunes and not the old v1.5 defs,

v2 defs come in v2 tune zip flle
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 08:56 PM   #385
B-R-Z
I love peanut butter
 
B-R-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Drives: 2013 SWP BRZ Limited
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 428
Thanked 584 Times in 349 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Garage
My car came with a A01C ROM and I was told (I think by Steve) that OFT A01C is a cal-id hacked B01C. It is safe to use B01C ROM and B01C defs, correct?
B-R-Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2015, 10:14 PM   #386
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by B-R-Z View Post
My car came with a A01C ROM and I was told (I think by Steve) that OFT A01C is a cal-id hacked B01C. It is safe to use B01C ROM and B01C defs, correct?
Yes you can just use B01C defs and roms in a car that originally came with A01C , their is and idle fix tsb out for dealers to update all cars on earlier roms B01C on customer complaint re idle.

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/attac...1&d=1395947828

Roms later than B01C may not be compatable

see first post in this thread for rom compatability

Last edited by steve99; 06-13-2015 at 02:13 AM.
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
EAGLE5 (06-12-2015)
Old 06-27-2015, 09:50 PM   #387
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 321 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
So right now we treat log records as snapshots in time, but in reality there's some serious skew going on -- if we poll 20 parameters, the last parameter polled is a lot closer in time to the next record than the current one.

It'd be interesting if we could measure the skew for each column. Maybe with the first row in a log being their offsets in time. Know if Tactrix has a way, or if we could calculate it based on the Tactrix config?
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 05:16 AM   #388
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phrosty View Post
So right now we treat log records as snapshots in time, but in reality there's some serious skew going on -- if we poll 20 parameters, the last parameter polled is a lot closer in time to the next record than the current one.

It'd be interesting if we could measure the skew for each column. Maybe with the first row in a log being their offsets in time. Know if Tactrix has a way, or if we could calculate it based on the Tactrix config?
How would it measure it and genuinely why would it matter? You don't need data that accurate. Does it matter if your ignition timing is 0.01 degrees different, or your MAF voltage has increased by a mV since the time value given?

Playing devils advocate here, but to do that as accurately as you suggest you would need an individual row for each cell of data. Seeing as each row is given a time value, to separate each column's data poll (or skew) you would have to allocate that poll a time value and therefore you would have a row that shows the time value and then one cell of data.

It's the logging resolution that really matters, if that's good enough then the data you collect will be more than adequate.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 10:57 AM   #389
phrosty
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Seattle
Posts: 806
Thanks: 202
Thanked 321 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
How would it measure it and genuinely why would it matter? You don't need data that accurate.
If I can get better accuracy, why not? More of a curiosity, certainly not a need.

Assuming each record follows the same plan, I think having the start of the file look like this would be sufficient:

Code:
Time,RPM,MAFv,FBKC,etc...
+0ms,+0ms,+20ms,+10ms,etc...
Then you could calculate each cell's actual time as an offset from the "Time" column.
__________________
2013 Whiteout 6AT FR-S | Perrin Inlet Tube + 2.75" CAI | OpenFlash Header | P&L Catback | 4.88 Final Drive | Dialed in OFT 2.0x Stage 2 E85 | 18x8 Enkei Raijin + 225/40 Michelin Pilot Super Sport | 17x7 Stock + 215/45 Michelin X-Ice Xi-2
phrosty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 07:15 PM   #390
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Logging OFT E85 using A01D...

So, it was my understanding that all the OFT's use a B01X that was changed for each bin and had a renamed calid, but when I use a B01D logcfg, I get zeroes for many params including engine speed/RPM...

This makes logging pretty much useless.. Any ideas what could be going on?

Jaden

ok so I re added the B01D logcfg and went out and did another log. It does show rpm but it doesn't seem right. I think it's off. Here is my log file. I know I redlined a couple of times and it idles at 700 so I don't understand why I'm getting these numbers...ok can't attach csv... oh well

Last edited by Jaden; 06-28-2015 at 07:28 PM.
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 07:40 PM   #391
aagun
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 86
Location: uae
Posts: 403
Thanks: 202
Thanked 67 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Make sure that you useing correct logcfg file for your rom type
aagun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2015, 08:34 PM   #392
Jaden
Road-hole
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FR-S
Location: Gilbert, Arizona
Posts: 1,112
Thanks: 272
Thanked 479 Times in 292 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
yes but it's not that simple...

Quote:
Originally Posted by aagun View Post
Make sure that you useing correct logcfg file for your rom type
I've tried both A01D and B01D... Because it's an OFT rom type I'm not sure which is right because they use a different base rom.

The base file I'm using doesn't tell me either because it's a modded one to go with the OFT specific roms which are named based on the name of the rom file you use, which is A01D in my case but isn't necessarily that type.

JAden
Jaden is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
ecuflash, tactrix, taxtrix, tuning

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ECUFlash - Getting close! xjohnx Software Tuning 698 03-22-2015 01:10 PM
EcuTek Flash finished but now it shows only a Partial Flash... Cross Software Tuning 32 02-12-2014 11:55 AM
Tactrix Openport jamesm Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons 1 01-28-2014 09:27 PM
Visconti Tuning - Latest BRZ Flash Info Visconti Software Tuning 6530 12-24-2013 11:18 PM
Overboost Protection With OFT/EcuFlash? FrX Software Tuning 9 10-23-2013 08:27 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.