follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2009, 05:18 PM   #29
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by S2KtoFT86 View Post
Bah!!
HAHA!


Nice to hear Toyota is staying true to the original car, and not giving into the turbo heads.

I'd take that weight estimate with a grain of salt honestly. 2800lbs? For a car THAT size? Its almost like they were trying their very hardest to get it to weigh as much as possible. Sounds way off.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 05:58 PM   #30
MR2fan
Member
 
MR2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: 91 MR2
Location: OC, CA
Posts: 83
Thanks: 0
Thanked 59 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSkoolToys View Post
HAHA!


Nice to hear Toyota is staying true to the original car, and not giving into the turbo heads.

I'd take that weight estimate with a grain of salt honestly. 2800lbs? For a car THAT size? Its almost like they were trying their very hardest to get it to weigh as much as possible. Sounds way off.
Well if it's true, it's got 2 years to diet and lose 200 pounds

How could it be 2800 pounds? The trunk must be full of dumbells.
__________________
// 1991 Toyota MR2 \\
-- 3sgte | HKS adjustable cams | TO-4E turbo | HKS 272 cams | H&R springs --
MR2fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:00 PM   #31
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by MR2fan View Post
Well if it's true, it's got 2 years to diet and lose 200 pounds

How could it be 2800 pounds? The trunk must be full of dumbells.
Or the real inline 4 made by toyota that'll be put in this car maybe?
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:49 PM   #32
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordo! View Post
I believe the engineer I spoke to said the car weighed 1300kg.
Are they sure it's 1300kg? Not 1200kg?
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:52 PM   #33
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
You guys do know that the S2000, which seems to be the car most similar in size and dimensions as the toyobaru concept, weighs over 2800 lbs, right? This is what I predicted.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:55 PM   #34
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
You guys do know that the S2000, which seems to be the car most similar in size and dimensions as the toyobaru concept, weighs 2800 lbs, right? This is what I predicted.
& you do know that S2k is convertible so they had to stiffen up the chassis more than coupe, but c'on we can wish for 2600lbs.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:04 PM   #35
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
& you do know that S2k is convertible so they had to stiffen up the chassis more than coupe, but c'on we can wish for 2600lbs.
I knew someone was gonna answer with this. Ordinarily, you'd be right. However, the S2K was designed from the ground up as a convertible, so the chassis is plenty stiff from the original design. And considering how well tuned it is from the factory, you know Honda did everything it's power to keep the weight down, but not at the expense of making expensive new parts that would drive it's price up.

We're talking about an entry level car in the toyobaru, costing approximately 21 large. Newsflash: it's going to have heavy, standardized parts on it from the existing Toyo or Subaru parts bins to keep costs down. There is no getting around that.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:06 PM   #36
DanZilla
Senior Member
 
DanZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: 05 New Formula Red Honda S2000
Location: Georgetown, DC
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Send a message via AIM to DanZilla
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldSkoolToys View Post
HAHA!


Nice to hear Toyota is staying true to the original car, and not giving into the turbo heads.

I'd take that weight estimate with a grain of salt honestly. 2800lbs? For a car THAT size? Its almost like they were trying their very hardest to get it to weigh as much as possible. Sounds way off.
If it was turbo, Sales would skyrocket over just being N/A IMO


Well maybe if it revved to 9k 240hp wouldnt be bad.
DanZilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:11 PM   #37
Jordo!
Enjoy it, destroy it.
 
Jordo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Datsun Racing Hen
Location: Blank Generation
Posts: 820
Thanks: 6
Thanked 61 Times in 48 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
^^^ That doesn't mean there won't be a TRD or aftermarket FI option...

Yeah... I'm going to to dial back my enthusiasm a bit until I hear something more encouraging regarding power:weight.

One bright note: It could be Toyota has not indicated the weight of the concept because they intend to make the production version significantly lighter -- let's hope so.
Jordo! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:47 AM   #38
FT///R86
Member
 
FT///R86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Toyota Matrix
Location: So Cal
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
The weight wont bother me. 2800lb will be ok as long as the car handles well and not like a muscle car. Toyota knows that they have to keep the weight down so maybe 2800lb is not a for sure thing.
FT///R86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 03:09 AM   #39
ichitaka05
Site Moderator
 
ichitaka05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: ichi 86 Project
Location: Middle of No where
Posts: 20,966
Thanks: 7,664
Thanked 19,052 Times in 8,327 Posts
Mentioned: 677 Post(s)
Tagged: 27 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Comet View Post
I knew someone was gonna answer with this. Ordinarily, you'd be right. However, the S2K was designed from the ground up as a convertible, so the chassis is plenty stiff from the original design. And considering how well tuned it is from the factory, you know Honda did everything it's power to keep the weight down, but not at the expense of making expensive new parts that would drive it's price up.

We're talking about an entry level car in the toyobaru, costing approximately 21 large. Newsflash: it's going to have heavy, standardized parts on it from the existing Toyo or Subaru parts bins to keep costs down. There is no getting around that.
I know Honda did everything it's power to keep the weight down for S2k. you're saying that if S2k was coupe and not convertible, it would of weight less or cost that stop em from make S2k lighter?

I'm not saying S2k is overweight. Just saying that S2k & GC8 (JDM ver) weight bout the same. S2k = FR NA 2L 9RPM 240hp. GC8 AWD 2L close to 8RPM 280hp. Just feels that S2k should of break 2800... but all those statements are just my selfish thoughts.
__________________
ichitaka05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 04:00 AM   #40
Blokatos
Senior Member
 
Blokatos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: MX5 Miata Mk2.5 1.6
Location: Here
Posts: 132
Thanks: 86
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
I know Honda did everything it's power to keep the weight down for S2k. you're saying that if S2k was coupe and not convertible, it would of weight less or cost that stop em from make S2k lighter?
No, Honda didn't do everything in it's power to keep the weight down for S2k.
Electrical mechanism to lower the roof in 6 secs???
__________________


Back to the ancient art of driving!
Blokatos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 06:09 AM   #41
White Comet
Resident Skeptic
 
White Comet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: '04 WRX
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 359
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ichitaka05 View Post
I know Honda did everything it's power to keep the weight down for S2k. you're saying that if S2k was coupe and not convertible, it would of weight less or cost that stop em from make S2k lighter?
I'm saying that if Honda charged 50k instead of 32-34k, then maybe you would see a car lighter by about 200 lbs or so, as it would have parts designed exclusively for it.

If it were designed as a coupe, I imagine the convertible version would weigh slightly more due to the need for extra chassis stiffening once the roof was chopped.
White Comet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 06:53 AM   #42
OldSkoolToys
Is a Monster
 
OldSkoolToys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: AE86, MA70
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 1,899
Thanks: 14
Thanked 282 Times in 148 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
I'm saying that this is a concept car all spiffied up to ooh and ahhh the masses.

Since its a concept, the official weight of the actual production car is yet to be known.

The only thing the concept has really shown is the relative size of the car, which matched exactly what Toyota said they were aiming for back, what, 2 years ago?

They also stated they wanted to keep this thing ~1200kg area (or about 2600lbs), and you know what? Pretty damn sure they can do it without making that pricerange go any bit higher than $20k.

And didn't this weight estimate come from some reply to some guys blog? "I think the engineer...",...yeah, thats not exactly valid, official, nor backed up information there.

"The engineer told me that this car actually weighs 1600kg, and will probably be about 50mm taller in height at production. Oh, and the RWD thing? Its all a FARSE! EAT THAT ENTHUSIASTS!"

See, I can say things too on some random website.

Last edited by OldSkoolToys; 10-24-2009 at 07:03 AM.
OldSkoolToys is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.