follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-06-2022, 12:24 AM   #1
NewFRSGuy
Junior Member
 
NewFRSGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Drives: white scion FRS
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Exaust: back pressure and velocity

Hello, I’m new to the car scene, and trying to best my knowledge. So I bought my 2013 FRS not too long ago. I’m new to this website so my apologies in advance for anything i may be doing wrong and/or nooby terminology.

First things first, I’ve recently started playing with my exaust, currently I have a high flow resonator with split y pipe and twin cans. I really want to go catless but my friend told me I would lose too much back pressure and higher velocity considering I already have a high flow resonator and no actual muffler. Now I looked into this as anyone would and to my understanding, I want a balance of back pressure and velocity, preferably low. Now here’s my question/‘s, if I were to take Out my cats would I lose power? If I bought high flow cats would I lose power? And if not what can I do to get louder without giving up some power? Or even just get a higher pitched sound?
Thank you
NewFRSGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 06:40 AM   #2
EndlessAzure
Wheels for Brains
 
EndlessAzure's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Drives: '14 FR-S [37J] | Daily/Track
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 878
Thanks: 108
Thanked 563 Times in 360 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFRSGuy View Post
Hello, I’m new to the car scene, and trying to best my knowledge. So I bought my 2013 FRS not too long ago. I’m new to this website so my apologies in advance for anything i may be doing wrong and/or nooby terminology.

First things first, I’ve recently started playing with my exaust, currently I have a high flow resonator with split y pipe and twin cans. I really want to go catless but my friend told me I would lose too much back pressure and higher velocity considering I already have a high flow resonator and no actual muffler. Now I looked into this as anyone would and to my understanding, I want a balance of back pressure and velocity, preferably low. Now here’s my question/‘s, if I were to take Out my cats would I lose power? If I bought high flow cats would I lose power? And if not what can I do to get louder without giving up some power? Or even just get a higher pitched sound?
Thank you
EndlessAzure is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to EndlessAzure For This Useful Post:
DarkPira7e (08-06-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 09:39 AM   #3
KillerBMotorsport
 
KillerBMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 568
Thanks: 89
Thanked 710 Times in 324 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Keep in mind taking out your cats will do you little good unless you get tuned for it. You car's exhaust will also stink, which turns a lot of people off from going catless.

I'd recommend a high-end performance cat. Newer cat technology is W-A-Y better than it used to be with minimal performance losses. You won't have to deal with a check engine light either.
KillerBMotorsport is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KillerBMotorsport For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (08-09-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 05:52 PM   #4
blsfrs
Senior Member
 
blsfrs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: 2013 frs base
Location: central Virginia
Posts: 1,093
Thanks: 1,684
Thanked 890 Times in 464 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBMotorsport View Post
Keep in mind taking out your cats will do you little good unless you get tuned for it. You car's exhaust will also stink, which turns a lot of people off from going catless.

I'd recommend a high-end performance cat. Newer cat technology is W-A-Y better than it used to be with minimal performance losses. You won't have to deal with a check engine light either.
Installing an aftermarket primary cat is no guarantee that you won't get a CEL. A tune is always recommended. "Usually" the tuner will disable the P0420 function. Now a days, I not sure of the legality of that action.
blsfrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 07:44 PM   #5
KillerBMotorsport
 
KillerBMotorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Drives: BRZ
Location: Virginia
Posts: 568
Thanks: 89
Thanked 710 Times in 324 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blsfrs View Post
Installing an aftermarket primary cat is no guarantee that you won't get a CEL.
There is a profound difference between a $150 cat and a $800 cat. The latter will work (at converting hydrocarbons) at least as good as OEM, if not better. We've never had a customer of our 911 cats get a CEL or fail emissions, even in Cali.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blsfrs View Post
Now a days, I not sure of the legality of that action.
It has always been illegal, but with the modding popularity over the last several years, it's got to the point where some manufacturers are low hanging fruit for prosecution.
KillerBMotorsport is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to KillerBMotorsport For This Useful Post:
blsfrs (08-07-2022)
Old 08-06-2022, 09:19 PM   #6
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewFRSGuy View Post
Hello, I’m new to the car scene, and trying to best my knowledge. So I bought my 2013 FRS not too long ago. I’m new to this website so my apologies in advance for anything i may be doing wrong and/or nooby terminology.

First things first, I’ve recently started playing with my exaust, currently I have a high flow resonator with split y pipe and twin cans. I really want to go catless but my friend told me I would lose too much back pressure and higher velocity considering I already have a high flow resonator and no actual muffler. Now I looked into this as anyone would and to my understanding, I want a balance of back pressure and velocity, preferably low. Now here’s my question/‘s, if I were to take Out my cats would I lose power? If I bought high flow cats would I lose power? And if not what can I do to get louder without giving up some power? Or even just get a higher pitched sound?
Thank you
My experience is that you shouldn't overthink it. There are plenty of good headers you can buy and two good tuning solutions available. The development work and theory have already been taken care of.
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 09:51 PM   #7
FrickingReallySlow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: San francisco
Posts: 356
Thanks: 144
Thanked 154 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Will the exhaust stink with just the header CAT removed but the front pipe still stock? would it still be bearable

Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerBMotorsport View Post
Keep in mind taking out your cats will do you little good unless you get tuned for it. You car's exhaust will also stink, which turns a lot of people off from going catless.

I'd recommend a high-end performance cat. Newer cat technology is W-A-Y better than it used to be with minimal performance losses. You won't have to deal with a check engine light either.
FrickingReallySlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2022, 10:11 PM   #8
Lantanafrs2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,088 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrickingReallySlow View Post
Will the exhaust stink with just the header CAT removed but the front pipe still stock? would it still be bearable
From my experience a catless header will produce more exhaust smell but only a little more sound. The secondary cat does pretty good on its own. I do run e85 though so my exhaust smells like corn lol.
Lantanafrs2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Lantanafrs2 For This Useful Post:
FrickingReallySlow (08-07-2022)
Old 08-09-2022, 09:34 AM   #9
cmiovino
Senior Member
 
cmiovino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Drives: 2017 BRZ PP, 2004 WRX
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 332
Thanks: 16
Thanked 223 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
As far as the cat, as others have said here, just use either the stock front pipe, or get a high flow aftermarket cat. The stock front pipes are actually quite good and swapping them doesn't net much of a gain. The cat also keeps rasp down.

As far as "back pressure", what you really want in an NA exhaust is the ability for the exhaust gas to exit as freely and quickly as possible. This isn't just going with the largest pipe available.

Typically, stock exhausts are a hair small, but they're generally close to the right size because manufactures are looking for efficiency to balance power, fuel economy, etc. Usually speaking, going a bit larger helps power. Let's say from 2.25in inner diameter to 2.5".

The idea behind reducing "back pressure" as people say is just fluid dynamics. You want that exhaust pipe "the right size" to allow for the gasses to exit quickly. Not too big, not too small. And that is highly dependent on the engine size (IE V8 vs a boxer four cylinder like these), forced induction or NA, etc.
__________________
2017 BRZ Limited Performance Pack - Steel Cities Region SCCA / North Hills Sports Car Club
cmiovino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cmiovino For This Useful Post:
Tatsu333 (08-09-2022), Tcoat (08-09-2022)
Old 08-09-2022, 10:40 AM   #10
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2494 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmiovino View Post
As far as the cat, as others have said here, just use either the stock front pipe, or get a high flow aftermarket cat. The stock front pipes are actually quite good and swapping them doesn't net much of a gain. The cat also keeps rasp down.

As far as "back pressure", what you really want in an NA exhaust is the ability for the exhaust gas to exit as freely and quickly as possible. This isn't just going with the largest pipe available.

Typically, stock exhausts are a hair small, but they're generally close to the right size because manufactures are looking for efficiency to balance power, fuel economy, etc. Usually speaking, going a bit larger helps power. Let's say from 2.25in inner diameter to 2.5".

The idea behind reducing "back pressure" as people say is just fluid dynamics. You want that exhaust pipe "the right size" to allow for the gasses to exit quickly. Not too big, not too small. And that is highly dependent on the engine size (IE V8 vs a boxer four cylinder like these), forced induction or NA, etc.
And age of the engine design! Many old engines with parts just sort of floating around in them needed back pressure to help things open and close. Modern engines with overhead cams, hydraulic lifters, etc just don't have the same requirements.

The Twins already come pretty much optimized for power in stock form. What traps people is thinking they are like Mom's old Civic with it's cast exhaust manifold, tiny exhaust and restrictive muffler that can see huge improvement by opening them up. Not to say that there can not be gains by increasing flow but they just simply will not be a great as those to be had on a car not designed for performance in the first place.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
Tatsu333 (08-09-2022)
Old 08-09-2022, 08:19 PM   #11
Oxyg3n
Senior Member
 
Oxyg3n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Drives: 2017 BRZ - WRB
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 319
Thanks: 115
Thanked 208 Times in 108 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
After I had my Tomei EL Catless headers installed (stock OP/FP/Perrin Catback), I noticed that there was reduced initial throttle response and (potentially due to placebo) lower power in the low rpm range (idle-2500rpm). The first half inch of the throttle seems more or less dead whereas before the header install, it felt very sensitive which helped clutch engagement.

Always wondered if this is because I reduced backpressure by going catless or if this problem points to something such as a leak. Love to hear if any other owners who installed cat-less headers felt this change.
Oxyg3n is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-14-2022, 02:54 AM   #12
Spuds
The Dictater
 
Spuds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,399
Thanks: 26,057
Thanked 12,400 Times in 6,129 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxyg3n View Post
After I had my Tomei EL Catless headers installed (stock OP/FP/Perrin Catback), I noticed that there was reduced initial throttle response and (potentially due to placebo) lower power in the low rpm range (idle-2500rpm). The first half inch of the throttle seems more or less dead whereas before the header install, it felt very sensitive which helped clutch engagement.

Always wondered if this is because I reduced backpressure by going catless or if this problem points to something such as a leak. Love to hear if any other owners who installed cat-less headers felt this change.
Is it tuned? And if so with what/who?
Spuds is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2022, 10:46 AM   #13
spcmafia
Senior Member
 
spcmafia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ
Location: Stonington, Connecticut
Posts: 3,273
Thanks: 1,510
Thanked 4,132 Times in 1,981 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oxyg3n View Post
After I had my Tomei EL Catless headers installed (stock OP/FP/Perrin Catback), I noticed that there was reduced initial throttle response and (potentially due to placebo) lower power in the low rpm range (idle-2500rpm). The first half inch of the throttle seems more or less dead whereas before the header install, it felt very sensitive which helped clutch engagement.

Always wondered if this is because I reduced backpressure by going catless or if this problem points to something such as a leak. Love to hear if any other owners who installed cat-less headers felt this change.

That type of stuf is normal if you had it tuned after installing such parts. The ECU has to relearn the throttle position-power delivery. If you're still experiencing this, it could be a bad tune.
__________________
“God gave me an okay mind, but a really good ass, which can feel everything in a car.” Nikki Lauda
spcmafia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2022, 12:04 PM   #14
chipmunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Don't know where to begin, but here it goes:

High RPM engines have very stiff valve springs. Or else, the valve springs set themselves into resonance within the operating ranges of speed. But when you use very stiff springs to over the resonance issues, you end up losing a lot of efficiency at mid-range. At full throttle, there is plenty of power to overcome the mechanical losses, but at partial and low throttles, where the engine makes significantly lower power, the mechanical losses due to valve spring compression become dominant. For this reason, the exhaust backpressure during mid- and low-range RPM creates enough negative pressure to help ease the effort it takes to compress the springs. The motorcycle industry relies on ex-up valves that can be adjusted on the go. I'm no longer involved with the exhaust mechanisms in the auto world, so I don't know if the current automotive technology uses this kind of valves, or still the exhaust pressure from other cylinders.

TLDR: You need backpressure in low-and mid-range to minimize mechanical losses from the valvetrain.
chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chipmunk For This Useful Post:
NoHaveMSG (08-15-2022), Spuds (08-24-2022)
 
Reply

Tags
back pressure, exaust, velocity

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Exhaust line and Back Pressure RG4L Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 20 06-20-2020 08:29 AM
Back Pressure kalamitykode Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 24 11-16-2014 11:34 PM
exhaust sizing and back pressure some facts on the debate cdrazic93 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 0 10-02-2014 02:21 PM
Not enough exhaust Back Pressure? Quiet car? mtimney Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 11 08-05-2013 11:10 PM
3in cat back exaust Frs300 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 24 02-02-2013 12:48 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.