follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-29-2014, 12:30 AM   #1
DAMotorsports
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS "Raven"
Location: SoCal
Posts: 503
Thanks: 335
Thanked 467 Times in 215 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
RacerX Upper Control Arms Review

We have been busy lately but when contacted by @DesertFrs (Jose) about the RacerX Fabrication's rear upper control arms ( @racerx1715 ) and if we would perform the install we couldn’t resist. We talked about which arms they had available (bushing or spherical joints) Jose chose the spherical joints. The parts came in and we did the install today. This will be our first impression (pros and cons) of the arms from install and how they changed the vehicle.

Upon removing the arms from the box we noted RacerX really did their homework. The welds looked amazing, joints moved freely and the spacers had a great fit. We then started the install. We took the time to take photos during the install as you will see at the bottom of the write up.

Install:

After jacking up the car and removing the wheels, we started removing the stock upper control arms. Toyota/Subaru used thread locks on the bolts so it took a bit more effort to remove. Once you loosened the bolts, the arm comes out without a problem. We compared the two arms side by side. RacerX did a great job at matching the mounting locations and curve to the stock arms. When we installed the RacerX arms, the inner mounts installed without a problem. Not the same as the knuckle end. Due to the coating on the knuckle we had to use a dead blow hammer to install the joint. This was the fun part, as the only way to set the camber is to remove the joint, make the adjustment, than reinstall. We took the time to take some camber readings before removing the stock arms, we started with 3.5 turns from max camber which is same as stock. We than had to remove the joint, to make the adjustment. To do this we used a hammer and a short poll to get the joint out. Once removed we tightened the joint 1 full turn and reinstalled. Our second attempt was spot on. 1 full turn showed a .5 degree change in camber.

After setting the camber and reinstalling the wires for the ABS, we noticed the stock bracket does not line up. We had to bend the inner mounting tab straight so we could install the bolt. Thats when we noticed a second problem, the mounting location is too high and puts the ABS wire in a location that could contact the chassis. Not a major problem as long as you bend the bracket to make some clearance (we contacted RacerX and they are going to look into a solution for this error). Install the wheels and repeat on the opposite side. RacerX really took the time to make sure their arms were a perfect match. During the install of the second side, we repeated the joint install with the same amount of turns and did not have to remove the joint.

After returning the vehicle to the ground we began the alignment. Unlike a lower control arm the toe did not change much and the wheel was still centered within the fender well. We set the car to -2 degrees of camber and 1/16” toe out.

With the alignment completed we took the car for a test drive. We expected an increases in road noise from the spherical joints but to our surprise the car sounded as if we never changed the arms (test drive was completed with the rear seat down). Just another sign of the quality work from RacerX.


Pro's:

1. Quality craftsmanship
2. Easy installation (even without instructions)
3. Everything needed to perform the install is provided
4.Design allows for easy replacement of the spherical joints if needed
5. Does not upset the toe like a lower control arm
6. Made in the USA

Con’s

1. ABS bracket fitment (we are sure this will be addressed)
2. The joint at the hub is a tight fit, requiring a hammer to install and remove. Not much of a con as we would rather have it tighter then looser. It’s nothing like the stock fitment.
3. Needs to be installed by someone with the ability to align the car during the install
4. Not alignment shop friendly. Due to the joint needing to be removed, there will be only a few select shop that will align your car. Those that do may charge extra for the time needed to make the adjustment.

With experience in racing and having tested several custom fabricated arms (on different platforms) RacerX arms a front runner with their quality control, everything from spot on fitment, great welds and easy install. Topped off with great customer care and a product made in the USA. We would recommend RacerX rear upper camber kit to anyone wanting the ability to adjust the rear camber.

****Disclaimer****
These are Double Apex Motorsports (DAMotorsports) views and findings on RacerX rear upper control arms. We do not work for or have any claim to RacerX and their product. Our only desirer is to help provided information about RacerX. Thank you for reviewing this thread and we hope this information assists you in your selection.

Name:  DSC_0259.JPG
Views: 5472
Size:  177.4 KB

Name:  DSC_0260.JPG
Views: 5436
Size:  175.4 KB
Name:  DSC_0300.JPG
Views: 5500
Size:  224.1 KB
Name:  DSC_0262.JPG
Views: 5426
Size:  224.4 KB
Name:  DSC_0264.JPG
Views: 5599
Size:  251.5 KB

Name:  DSC_0266.JPG
Views: 6033
Size:  230.1 KB

Name:  DSC_0276.JPG
Views: 5292
Size:  171.7 KB

Name:  DSC_0280.JPG
Views: 5360
Size:  203.7 KB
Name:  DSC_0287.JPG
Views: 5305
Size:  240.3 KB

Name:  DSC_0293.JPG
Views: 5388
Size:  235.6 KB

Name:  DSC_0295.JPG
Views: 5548
Size:  184.8 KB

Name:  DSC_0296.JPG
Views: 5271
Size:  188.9 KB

Name:  DSC_0298.JPG
Views: 5200
Size:  193.7 KB

Last edited by DAMotorsports; 01-29-2014 at 12:51 AM.
DAMotorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to DAMotorsports For This Useful Post:
Black Tire (04-01-2015), Calum (01-29-2014), DesertFrs (01-29-2014), DriftEightSix (01-30-2014), F1point4 (01-29-2014), Jeff@Racer X Fab (01-29-2014), normancw (01-30-2014), RehabJeff86 (02-02-2014), Sithspawn (01-29-2014)
Old 01-29-2014, 12:42 AM   #2
F1point4
Photo Specialist
 
F1point4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 DGM 6MT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 587
Thanked 1,803 Times in 420 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Thanks for the detailed write-up. These look like a great bit of kit. I may have to pick up a set.
F1point4 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to F1point4 For This Useful Post:
DAMotorsports (01-29-2014), DesertFrs (01-29-2014)
Old 01-30-2014, 06:18 PM   #3
SLICVIC
Senior Member
 
SLICVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2006 STi
Location: NYC
Posts: 589
Thanks: 495
Thanked 444 Times in 210 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Nice write up. Just thought id add, apart from a performance standpoint, These arms give a ton of clearance when dialing in negative camber as opposed to the lower arms. The RacerX uppers tilt the top of the wheel inwards while Any lower arm kicks out the bottom of the wheel giving the same angle but not as much fender clearance
__________________
SLICVIC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SLICVIC For This Useful Post:
DAMotorsports (01-31-2014)
Old 01-30-2014, 07:33 PM   #4
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Finally. I greatly prefer adjustable UCAs over LCAs. Too bad I don't track the BRZed anymore.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
cdrazic93 (06-15-2015), wparsons (01-31-2014)
Old 01-31-2014, 11:51 AM   #5
DAMotorsports
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS "Raven"
Location: SoCal
Posts: 503
Thanks: 335
Thanked 467 Times in 215 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLICVIC View Post
Nice write up. Just thought id add, apart from a performance standpoint, These arms give a ton of clearance when dialing in negative camber as opposed to the lower arms. The RacerX uppers tilt the top of the wheel inwards while Any lower arm kicks out the bottom of the wheel giving the same angle but not as much fender clearance
Thank you @SLICVIC! This is the reason we advised the owner to order the UCA's. He had some rubbing with his setup and after adding some camber he is in love with both the look and how it handles. If your are planning a static drop look and need more clearance this is the best option.
DAMotorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DAMotorsports For This Useful Post:
SLICVIC (01-31-2014)
Old 01-31-2014, 12:47 PM   #6
fooddude
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 04 Toyota Tacoma Prerunner Reg Cab
Location: LA > SF > NYC > OC
Posts: 943
Thanks: 556
Thanked 268 Times in 200 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I dig that solid outer ball joint. Are the inner joints solid/bearings too? (can't tell buy the angle of the pic). Looks true race quality (reminds me of long-travel desert/baja truck control arms)
fooddude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 12:49 PM   #7
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
It's also great that it doesn't mess with toe settings when changing camber too!
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 12:59 PM   #8
fooddude
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 04 Toyota Tacoma Prerunner Reg Cab
Location: LA > SF > NYC > OC
Posts: 943
Thanks: 556
Thanked 268 Times in 200 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Sux tho to read that it's still hard to adjust for a general alignment shop. I can see how that'd hard with the inner bushings; but from the pics, it looks much easier since the adjustment is on the outer joint instead ..they shoulda designed it so you don't need to remove the joint and so u can just adjust it while it's on the arm still..u sure you need to remove the joiny from the arm to adjust? ..it looks like it was designed to be easy from the internet pics (but I guess you'd have to see it in person).
fooddude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2014, 03:05 PM   #9
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,353 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
^^ Space reasons I would bet, to make it adjustable without removing the arm from the knuckle you need a piece of threaded rod that is threaded left on one side and right on the other, then a jamb nut to keep it from spinning once you're happy with the setting. It's nothing hard, but it would take up a lot more space and from the look of the arms there isn't any room to accommodate it?
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2014, 03:12 PM   #10
supramkivtt2jz
PROUD OF BOXER
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: Raven FR-S
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 668
Thanks: 221
Thanked 356 Times in 169 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
off topic from the product in question, but what alignment tool are you using?
__________________
supramkivtt2jz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2014, 02:20 PM   #11
Jeff@Racer X Fab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ, Toyota MR2 Turbo
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 321
Thanks: 92
Thanked 340 Times in 135 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Update for Rear upper control arms.

Robert was nice enough to contact us after the installation and voicing his potential concern with the brake line bracket that is connected to the upper control arms. We have not had any issues to date with the the brake line contacting the chassis, but to be proactive we changed the fastener bracket at the back of the upper control arms. This updated design will lower the brake bracket about 1" lower away from the frame and provide additional clearance.

Thanks for the write up!! We always appreciate feedback.



Jeff@Racer X Fab is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jeff@Racer X Fab For This Useful Post:
Hyper4mance2k (04-02-2015), Koa (04-02-2015)
Old 10-30-2014, 11:27 PM   #12
Frs123
Senior Member
 
Frs123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: Raven
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 100
Thanks: 51
Thanked 37 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
How do you adjust these Uca to get negative camber? Sorry I'm just a little confused.
__________________
Instagram: erik239
Frs123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 11:00 AM   #13
Jeff@Racer X Fab
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Subaru BRZ, Toyota MR2 Turbo
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 321
Thanks: 92
Thanked 340 Times in 135 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frs123 View Post
How do you adjust these Uca to get negative camber? Sorry I'm just a little confused.
No problem, When we build the control arms we have the rod end threaded out. When installing the arm the rod end will be threaded into the weld insert further providing negative camber. Make sense??
Jeff@Racer X Fab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 12:20 PM   #14
mid_life_crisis
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: FR-S 10 #103 AT
Location: NC
Posts: 1,519
Thanks: 101
Thanked 599 Times in 347 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by fooddude View Post
Sux tho to read that it's still hard to adjust for a general alignment shop. I can see how that'd hard with the inner bushings; but from the pics, it looks much easier since the adjustment is on the outer joint instead ..they shoulda designed it so you don't need to remove the joint and so u can just adjust it while it's on the arm still..u sure you need to remove the joiny from the arm to adjust? ..it looks like it was designed to be easy from the internet pics (but I guess you'd have to see it in person).
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
^^ Space reasons I would bet, to make it adjustable without removing the arm from the knuckle you need a piece of threaded rod that is threaded left on one side and right on the other, then a jamb nut to keep it from spinning once you're happy with the setting. It's nothing hard, but it would take up a lot more space and from the look of the arms there isn't any room to accommodate it?
An advantage to their approach is that, should the jamb nut work itself loose, the assembly can only move so far. There is no danger of the thing working itself loose while flying around a track.
__________________
Necessity may be the mother of Invention but Desperation is quite often the father.
“Sex is like Bridge. If you don't have a good partner, you'd better have a good hand.” - Mae West
Papa said, "son there's a lot of evil temptations out there. Best to try 'em all so you know which ones to avoid."
mid_life_crisis is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Racer X Fabrication: Upper rear control arms, in stock/ready to ship!! Jeff@Racer X Fab Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 25 01-24-2014 12:42 PM
Adjustable rear upper control arms??? Supermassive Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 28 09-29-2013 10:17 AM
Oem rear upper control arms Jhon19lopez Brakes, Suspension, Chassis 1 08-25-2013 10:01 PM
GTSPEC rear control arms & toe arms review Jesse Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 5 08-23-2013 04:20 PM
Upper control arms for bulk camber JordanWho Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 33 06-18-2013 12:40 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.