|
GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) General topics for the GR86 second-gen 86 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-08-2021, 02:34 AM | #1 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
GR 86 torque curve for Assetto Corsa
I wanted to virtually compare the on-track performance of 2022 against 2017-2020 and 2013-2016.
To achieve that, I've decided to create a virtual '17 and a virtual '22 based on the '13 that comes in the game. I'm assuming the main differences are just the torque curve and the final drive, and that the final drive of 2022 is the same as 2013-2016. Here's a screenshot from https://acstuff.ru/u/torque-helper/ vs the torque curve in the in-car display: Here are the numbers I entered into that tool: Quote:
|
|
07-08-2021, 02:42 AM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Here are the same numbers, subtracting 13% for drivetrain loses (I don't know why the tool doesn't allow that),
which matches what AC did to the 2013 Toyota 86 compared to the spec sheet: Quote:
|
|
07-08-2021, 03:04 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Drives: Planning for GR86
Location: Milano, Italy
Posts: 69
Thanks: 24
Thanked 38 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Is that torque curve official? There’s a strange drop after 3k rpm
|
07-08-2021, 03:07 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
It's been discussed on multiple other threads before. Good news is that the new torque dip is much smaller than the old one. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timurrrr For This Useful Post: | Blighty (07-09-2021) |
07-09-2021, 09:41 PM | #5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: WR Blue Pearl 2022 Subaru BRZ
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 818
Thanks: 790
Thanked 517 Times in 274 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I think potentially there is a slightly sharper curve down after 7k than is what is represented on the image, but I might be imagining it because your running it through to 0 at 8. Is that forced in AC, ie do you have to run it our to 0 at the top gearing? |
|
07-09-2021, 10:53 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
IMO these numbers might be interesting even for folks who only have general interest in the car, but no interest in AC. Don't know if it's strictly required, but this is how all other configs I looked at have. |
|
07-10-2021, 03:04 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
I found out that RaceChrono has a mode that allows you to log data from Assetto Corsa
(RaceChrono can't stop amazing me), so I couldn't help but log some data. I did a few laps at Laguna Seca in the '13-'16 GT86 that comes with in the game. According to my calculations, the built-in torque curve produced ~167 wheel hp, which is typical for these cars irl. Car setup:
Then I also did a few laps in the same car with the same setup, but with the torque curve from the earlier post (~197 wheel hp, matches what Toyota folks say). My opt lap in the "GR 86" was 1:46.05 I can certainly polish my laps slightly, but I don't think I can easily shave off more than a few tenths from these opt laps. Here's the comparison between speed traces of the best laps in each car: If you trust such a testing approach, looks like we'll be seeing 4–5 mph of difference at the end of longer straights, and ~2.5s of difference per lap at Laguna Seca. It's important to note that my 1:48.63 lap in the GT86 is over 2 seconds faster than the 86DC Stock class record (1:50.78). This can be explained by many factors, such as:
higher than my car does irl in the 86DC Street class. (wider tires than 86DC Stock, coilovers) Having said that, I think the "4–5 mph speed, 2.5s per lap" difference is the right ballpark. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to timurrrr For This Useful Post: | fredzy (02-08-2022), HKz (07-11-2021), jflogerzi (07-11-2021), Ohio Enthusiast (07-11-2021), Sport-Tech (07-10-2021) |
07-11-2021, 12:36 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Using your power.lut values, I got a similar differential in times, although my speeds were slower (I used an otherwise-unmodified car, street tires, TC on, `fast` track conditions).
|
07-11-2021, 12:58 PM | #9 |
Reformed
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '23 GRC, '11 Prius, '04 RAV4
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,312
Thanks: 1,234
Thanked 1,133 Times in 588 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I thought assetto corsa used some of the truest representation of many tracks since they used laser scanning, albeit not sure how much for laguna. Maybe better times could also be due to having less fear with higher cornering speeds. I know I push my speeds higher in assetto than I would in rl...of course many runs have resulted in wrecks lol
|
07-11-2021, 02:12 PM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: 2013 Series 10 6MT FR-S
Location: Moreno Valley, CA
Posts: 5,526
Thanks: 1,999
Thanked 2,012 Times in 1,456 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Very cool. Thanks for the info!
__________________
2013 Series 10 FRS #553
RCE T2's, SPC LCAs -4/2.6 camber JDL 4-2-1 EL, FP and OP, Tuned by Zach@CSG on e85 RR Wilwood Front/Rear Sport BBK, Motul 600 Fluid ARC-8 17x9 SX2 GTs 245s/Koing 17x8 v730's 225's |
07-11-2021, 02:44 PM | #11 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,707
Thanks: 2,128
Thanked 1,296 Times in 718 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
You can't laser scan how grippy the surface is Also tracks change. Notably, the inside of the first apex, and the right runoff area in the downhill part of The Corkscrew are now more drivable irl than what it was a few years ago. The track in AC doesn't have those, so I presume it was laser scanned before those changes. I've heard CotA is getting bumpier each year, that's another example of the limitation of laser scanning. Don't know to what degree it applies to Laguna. Quote:
Definitely not enough difference to explain multiple seconds of difference. |
||
The Following User Says Thank You to timurrrr For This Useful Post: | HKz (07-12-2021) |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Xbox one - Forza 6, Assetto Corsa, Project cars - ONLINE play? | rice_classic | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 4 | 02-06-2017 04:23 PM |
The FRS torque curve | smbrm | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 29 | 06-30-2016 04:10 PM |
Customizing the torque curve using ROM Raider | illmatic_frs | Software Tuning | 8 | 02-15-2016 01:12 AM |
Assetto Corsa - Racing Sim | merlin2111 | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 4 | 01-15-2015 05:07 PM |
Ideal street torque curve | Bischoff | Forced Induction | 29 | 05-03-2014 10:53 AM |