|
GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) General topics for the GR86 second-gen 86 |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Drives: '04 STi, '12 Mazda 3 Hatch
Location: Breckenridge, CO
Posts: 380
Thanks: 30
Thanked 122 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Subframe/Swaybar GR86 vs BRZ
So which is the better system? Have any owners swapped?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Drives: 22 BRZ limited
Location: NW IA
Posts: 1,203
Thanks: 221
Thanked 1,018 Times in 534 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It isn't exactly easy to swap mounting systems. One is part of the subframe, and we don't know(highly unlikely) if you can have both installed together.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Drives: '04 STi, '12 Mazda 3 Hatch
Location: Breckenridge, CO
Posts: 380
Thanks: 30
Thanked 122 Times in 89 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Has it been decided which system is theoretically best?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: It has 4 wheels
Location: Australia
Posts: 101
Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
The BRZ system is. Bodyroll would not pull on the subframe from the swaybar links, making it move, which isn't desirable.
If you fit solid subframe bushes to a GR86, it's effectively the same as a BRZ. I plan to solid mount and lift the subframe with Parts Shop Max solid bushes once 2nd gen compatibility is confirmed. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to bradsm87 For This Useful Post: | Yoshoobaroo (03-03-2023) |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Drives: X5 35d, D90, CX-5 Turbo
Location: Maryland
Posts: 338
Thanks: 83
Thanked 226 Times in 126 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Are you asking a Subaru Engineer, or a Toyota Engineer?
Same questions exist regarding the choice of aluminum front knuckle vs the nodular iron one. Was it just an accounting decision, or did the engineers feel it was the better choice (for whatever reason).. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to LRNAD90 For This Useful Post: | DylanJZA (07-22-2022) |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Drives: 2022 MT Neptune GR86 Prem.
Location: Cincinnati, OHIO
Posts: 492
Thanks: 143
Thanked 315 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Both. Neither. Did you watch the video? The answer is they are different...
Having said that, we do know that the GR86 was quicker on a certain track, on a certain day, under certain circumstances. I think it is also safe to say that the BRZ system is not as harsh for daily driving. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Drives: GR86
Location: Kansas
Posts: 323
Thanks: 168
Thanked 249 Times in 139 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The GR86 is more willing to get the tail out earlier. The BRZ stays tucked in longer. For me, I'd rather have some tail slip before all four tires hit the limit because A: it appeals to my inner 12 year-old and B: a rapid transition from grip to drift brings a significant chance of losing control. The BRZ also (from what I've read - haven't driven one) has a slightly less harsh ride in daily driving conditions. The GR86 isn't going to rattle your fillings, but if you drive home with a case of carbonated beverage in the trunk you might not want to open it right away. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Drives: 18 Brz (Sold) / 22 BRZ
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Thanks: 1,051
Thanked 442 Times in 258 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: '20 Tundra, '84 SpecE30
Location: OH
Posts: 38
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Weren't the primary differences in design covered in this video featured in this thread?
https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=150324 The 86's bracing of the subframe mount provides more rigidity, as well as making the sway bar easier to remove/change. Swapping would require at least changing out subframes, but I would need to spend more time with the above video to see if it might require swapping rear hubs too |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Drives: 18 Brz (Sold) / 22 BRZ
Location: Michigan
Posts: 656
Thanks: 1,051
Thanked 442 Times in 258 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Checking with an experienced suspension engineer (40+ yrs of experience), based on a quick look on the video (no car on lift, no slalom or any vehicle testing), his comments were:
1. Seems like Subaru priority was ride while Toyota was handling. 2. Toyota bracket seems to have a stronger rigidity, as Subaru’s is attached to a bolt. 3. Expects for the GR to have a quicker response on the rear. 4. Expects for a improved roll control on GR 5. Expects Subaru to have better response to irregularities and bumps. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,635
Thanks: 1,420
Thanked 3,968 Times in 2,073 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I dunno, if Toyota bar is braced to the subframe, which is attached to the mainframe with bushings, that adds compliance, the bar is less firmly grounded to the chassis.
I have to say, from what I've seen with the aluminum front knuckles vs. steel, and the different mounting of the rear sway bar, these differences look so minor as to pretty much be negligible. Handling differences are likely more down to spring rates and possibly bump stops giving the Toyo more outside rear loading in cornering. I'm leaning towards the Subie for the aluminum knuckles just because even ~6-7 lb. off the nose of the car is a positive when it's so dang front-biased (55.5/44.5 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post: | PBR (07-13-2022) |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,797
Thanks: 2,176
Thanked 4,243 Times in 2,221 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Yeah it almost seems like he got the two mixed up. I don’t see how the sway bar that’s attached directly to the chassis/body could be slower or more compliant than the one that’s mounted to the subframe.
Someone else answered this question on a Reddit page and the answer made sense to me, at least in theory: Quote:
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."
2022 BRZ Build 2013 FR-S Build |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: It has 4 wheels
Location: Australia
Posts: 101
Thanks: 17
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
People are chiming in stating the differences between the COMPLETE vehicles but that wasn't the question. The question is solely regarding the swaybar setup. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Quote:
The 2022 GR86 uses the 2017-2020 set up, 18mm front and 15mm rear. The 2022 BRZ uses a new 18.3mm hollow front bar and a 14mm rear. The equations for figuring out spring rate from swaybar dimensions aren't too hard and there are numbers posted on this forum somewhere. Have to remember the motion ratio for the swaybars as well (which can be different than the main spring motion ratios). That new hollow BRZ front bar has been quoted as a mild 2.3% stiffer than the standard 18mm solid front bar. That's not very much but it is probably a little lighter which is nice. As with the aluminum front hubs you can see Subaru made effort (at extra cost) to reduce unsprung weight. Which is good. With both springs and swaybars you have more front roll resistance and less rear roll resistance with the BRZ vs the GR86. The rear swaybar mounting method is a related but different question. Like others said the new BRZ takes the subframe and subframe bushings out of the equation, meaning it acts without compliance from the subframe bushings. The subframe on standard bushings moves more than you think. Yes you can add subframe bushing inserts but something like a solid bushing insert or full replacement adds noise and is not great on a daily driver. Does that make the 14mm BRZ rear act like a stiffer rear bar? Not really, but it's a more linear and direct action. Which is good IMO. All the discussion about the playful nature of the GR86 vs the stability of a BRZ is largely the spring and swaybar rates, not the front hubs or rear swaybar mounts. This is just my opinion but the GR86 using the old style front hubs and the rear swaybar mounts was simply cost savings. Arguably the solid vs hollow front bar too (2.3% difference in stiffness isn't much). So why is the GR86 sometimes faster around a track? Well the new BRZ components are better but not a huge change. Meanwhile, off the factory floor these cars desperately need more front camber. Without that, more rear roll stiffness from the GR86 helps a lot to get the car to turn. With the aluminum front hubs and new rear swaybar mount, the GR86 would be largely similar and still have the "playful" character. The best handling 2022 would be a BRZ with GR86 rear springs and the OEM crash bolts for a tiny bit more camber. Maybe the GR86 rear 15mm bar too. ![]() - Andrew |
||
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | Blighty (03-07-2023), diga (03-08-2023), DylanJZA (07-22-2022), Haust (03-23-2023), Mike Roadway (02-05-2024), norcalpb (07-14-2022), Ohio Enthusiast (07-14-2022), PBR (07-14-2022), Sport-Tech (07-14-2022), steel86gt (03-03-2023), Stonehorsw (07-14-2022), Yoniyama (09-24-2022), ZDan (07-14-2022) |
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GR86 In R7 of the Toyota Gazoo Racing GT Cup + GR86 coming to Grand Turismo Sport | Blighty | GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) | 37 | 07-18-2021 04:38 PM |
WRX swaybar | horrorbiz | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 10 | 03-14-2016 05:48 PM |
FS (MI): Front strano swaybar, rear wrx swaybar | Aznsky | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 4 | 11-04-2014 03:09 PM |
Swaybar Noise? | dizzario | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 11 | 06-26-2014 12:46 AM |
REVIEW | DC Sports rear subframe brace / rear subframe lateral brace | mav1178 | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 7 | 04-10-2014 09:59 PM |