follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-16-2019, 07:31 PM   #1
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
deatchwerks 700cc injector tuning

I want to get some additional input, as I think the settings supplied by deatchwerks are a lil off. I know the injector flow constant was off but I am primarily asking about the throttle tip-in a/b these numbers are significantly lower than whats in the uel tunes and in a tune I have for turbo based off sbd. and in driving, I have noticed that upon throttle changes I am seeing it go way lean, like deep off lean. so am wanting some opinions
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2019, 09:45 PM   #2
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
The deatworks setting will be compensating for the bigger injectors


stock is 228cc


as the crank tables and tip in tables are a raw pulse width rarter than flow you need to compensate for having injectors 3 times the size hence the lower tip in numbers.


however you have a turbo so you may rant to increase the tip in table numbers.


you also need to make sure you maf scaling is ok first.


make sure you allow for fuel pressure as well a lot of injector scalings are for 45psi pressure but these cars run arround 65 psi.


try tip in numbers close to stock.


ie just change the injector scaling , latency and crank pulse compensation.


al try running full Direct injection till about 0.6 load in the pi/di tables.


the lean condition may be due to latency of port injectors rather than tip in tables
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post:
1quickchic (01-16-2019), Yobiwan (01-17-2019)
Old 01-16-2019, 11:48 PM   #3
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Steve you have been a great help thanks man! I figure something was up, the maf scaling I think I have a handle on still working on it little by little right now my biggest issue is when it go's drop dead lean , walking into it isn't bad, and once it does get into boost its smooth. I am running a swirl pot, and have my fuel pressure set at 43 no vacuum. for the iat cranking pulse width, I actually have it set to 0 and the car is starting on that, if I am not mistaken, that's what the cranking is for? opinion? change it?
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 01:45 AM   #4
Yobiwan
Senior Member
 
Yobiwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Turbo, Lexus NX300H
Location: S.Korea
Posts: 135
Thanks: 263
Thanked 166 Times in 73 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I had a similar problem - RPM fluctuation by throttle tip in when neutral - after installing DW450 injector.

I've edited every table by DW 's instruction.
(Injector latency, injector flow brz , throttle tip-in AB, Cranking fuel IAT )

but after seeing your writing , I just made new map with stock tip in AB table, and using 100% DI under 0.6 load.

and ALL irregular throttle response & rpm fluctuation are gone.

thank you !!!
__________________
2012 Toyota 86 6MT / 11:1 CR block by Outfront / SBD500x Turbo 17PSI@93gas /Avo 2.5 overpipe+Avo 2.5 catted frontpipe /MAP 3" CBE/ Tein Mono sport / STI brembo Front /OS技研 LSD/SSR GTX01 18x9.5
Yobiwan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Yobiwan For This Useful Post:
1quickchic (03-17-2019), steve99 (01-17-2019)
Old 01-17-2019, 02:16 AM   #5
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
please excuse my ignorance but "running full Direct injection till about 0.6 load in the pi/di tables"
& "sing 100% DI under 0.6 load"

maybe I'm tired but I am not finding it in romraider and don't know if this matters but using oft
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 02:25 AM   #6
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1quickchic View Post
Steve you have been a great help thanks man! I figure something was up, the maf scaling I think I have a handle on still working on it little by little right now my biggest issue is when it go's drop dead lean , walking into it isn't bad, and once it does get into boost its smooth. I am running a swirl pot, and have my fuel pressure set at 43 no vacuum. for the iat cranking pulse width, I actually have it set to 0 and the car is starting on that, if I am not mistaken, that's what the cranking is for? opinion? change it?



Theors two ways to adjust cranling fueling one is using the 6 or more pulse width vs iat tables amd the other is use the rpm vs pulse tables with bigger injectors its easier to ise the rpm vs pulse tables
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 03:05 AM   #7
Yobiwan
Senior Member
 
Yobiwan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Toyota 86 Turbo, Lexus NX300H
Location: S.Korea
Posts: 135
Thanks: 263
Thanked 166 Times in 73 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1quickchic View Post
please excuse my ignorance but "running full Direct injection till about 0.6 load in the pi/di tables"
& "sing 100% DI under 0.6 load"

maybe I'm tired but I am not finding it in romraider and don't know if this matters but using oft
these are my tables that I test today.

I will test about PI ratio% more. but these works good anyway.

BTW, your definition should have these tables.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2012 Toyota 86 6MT / 11:1 CR block by Outfront / SBD500x Turbo 17PSI@93gas /Avo 2.5 overpipe+Avo 2.5 catted frontpipe /MAP 3" CBE/ Tein Mono sport / STI brembo Front /OS技研 LSD/SSR GTX01 18x9.5
Yobiwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 10:12 AM   #8
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
that seems to be my issue my definition doesn't have those tables :/ I can find some of the tables in a tree labeled "alpha brz" but the "PI Ratio Threshold's" are completely absent
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 05:44 PM   #9
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1quickchic View Post
that seems to be my issue my definition doesn't have those tables :/ I can find some of the tables in a tree labeled "alpha brz" but the "PI Ratio Threshold's" are completely absent



Easier way to achieve 100% di till 0.6 load is jist to put zero in the cells up to 0.6 load in all three pi\di tables clod warm hot


Some bigger port injectprs are not good at injecting small quantities of fuel at low pulse widths. As we have a dual injection system when your injecting from both systems pulse widths are even smaller. By going to 100% di at low loads your jist using the standard factory direct injectors which have suffient capacity at low loads to supply all fuel. Then switch in the port as fuel demand increases and longer pulse widths required
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 06:42 PM   #10
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
Easier way to achieve 100% di till 0.6 load is jist to put zero in the cells up to 0.6 load in all three pi\di tables clod warm hot


Some bigger port injectprs are not good at injecting small quantities of fuel at low pulse widths. As we have a dual injection system when your injecting from both systems pulse widths are even smaller. By going to 100% di at low loads your jist using the standard factory direct injectors which have suffient capacity at low loads to supply all fuel. Then switch in the port as fuel demand increases and longer pulse widths required
so we are on the same page you are talking about the "Total Injection Ratio Port cold/warm/hot" tables?
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2019, 11:30 PM   #11
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1quickchic View Post
so we are on the same page you are talking about the "Total Injection Ratio Port cold/warm/hot" tables?

yes they are the three tables to change, zero out everything up to 0.6 load
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2019, 07:13 PM   #12
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
yes they are the three tables to change, zero out everything up to 0.6 load

did this but still isn't wanting to cooperate with me, while low throttle cruise its super rich, upon throttle it wants to head towards lean, once in boost afr is good but the transition isn't always smooth, this is bein a pita
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2019, 08:53 PM   #13
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1quickchic View Post
did this but still isn't wanting to cooperate with me, while low throttle cruise its super rich, upon throttle it wants to head towards lean, once in boost afr is good but the transition isn't always smooth, this is bein a pita

If during low throttle cruise is still runnog 100% di ie its under 0.6 load then something is way off like maf scaling if its going rich on di only. As the di system has not been altered.


Its likely maf scaling way off, or strange fuel pressure issue


Check you di computer is solidly groinded via it mount bolts all three as if its not grounded\earthed weird fueling will happens its the computer bolted to side of engine



Also are you running ecutek with speed density ?
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2019, 12:04 AM   #14
1quickchic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Panda ft86/FRS
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 22
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
If during low throttle cruise is still runnog 100% di ie its under 0.6 load then something is way off like maf scaling if its going rich on di only. As the di system has not been altered.


Its likely maf scaling way off, or strange fuel pressure issue


Check you di computer is solidly groinded via it mount bolts all three as if its not grounded\earthed weird fueling will happens its the computer bolted to side of engine



Also are you running ecutek with speed density ?
definitely grounded, hood via a circle earth ground, running oft, which I may be hitting its limitations at the level I am at I have it scaled for the sti maf in a 2.75 pipe atm and I have worked with it and got it about as good as it can be , it basically like idle or haul ass and no middle ground. I think my next step is probably getting ecutek with racerom, and ditching the oft
1quickchic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
tuning frs maf/injector QTR FMS Software Tuning 80 11-01-2018 06:45 AM
Element Tuning FRS/BRZ Hydra EMS Stand-Alone Turbo 400 whp Injector Limited Element Tuning Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 40 12-17-2013 01:12 AM
Injector Seals went Bad while tuning my car whitefrs Forced Induction 128 08-20-2013 12:19 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.