|
Engine, Exhaust, Transmission Discuss the FR-S | 86 | BRZ engine, exhaust and drivetrain. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
04-09-2018, 09:12 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2017 Ice Silver BRZ Limited
Location: East TN, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 235
Thanked 90 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Boost vs Revs: Comparing Internal Engine Stresses
Let's say you had two engines that both made 280 HP. One is boosted and makes peak HP at 7200 RPM and the other is N/A and makes equivalent power by revving to 8000 RPM.
The FI engine is making it's power numbers through higher cylinder pressures and therefore greater torque, while the N/A engine is making power through lower torque numbers at a greater frequency (The power of the Maths!) Assuming identical internals, which engine is working harder/wearing out faster? I'll be honest, I'm mostly interested in the forces affecting the rotating assembly specifically the connecting rods, but I don't want to limit any productive discussion. Answers involving physics and math would be most useful. |
04-09-2018, 09:39 PM | #2 |
TRACKBREAD
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,031 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Boost vs Revs: Comparing Internal Engine Stresses
As long as you rule out anomalous events like detonation, the higher revs will kill the motor faster than boost.
The force on the rods and crank due to cylinder pressure are trivial compared to the inertial forces of a piston and rod going up and down 133 times PER SECOND. The bearings need to withstand the force of the piston traveling around 25 mph, and reversing its direction in 1/133th of a second. It's incredible these things even work. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoshoobaroo For This Useful Post: | Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-09-2018, 09:54 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,901
Thanks: 7,285
Thanked 2,940 Times in 1,782 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
What about the stress on con rods?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Teseo For This Useful Post: | Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-09-2018, 10:00 PM | #4 |
TRACKBREAD
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,031 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoshoobaroo For This Useful Post: | Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-09-2018, 10:01 PM | #5 |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,509
Thanks: 26,348
Thanked 12,529 Times in 6,205 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
If the internals we're identical, they would be woefully inadequate for one or the other, or moderately inadequate for both.
By inadequate, I mean not optimized, leaving either significant power on the table or being more likely to break under the given conditions. The answer is therefore: It depends on which situation the engine was originally designed for. PS, don't wanna math... |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Spuds For This Useful Post: | Teseo (04-09-2018), Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-09-2018, 10:06 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: BRZ, Noble M400, AC-LS7,1956 AC
Location: Wi/Fl
Posts: 1,022
Thanks: 328
Thanked 867 Times in 471 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think you should stop thinking of HP and look at the torque curve, work load and stress.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ls1ac For This Useful Post: | CSG Mike (04-10-2018), Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-10-2018, 10:39 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: 2017 Ice Silver BRZ Limited
Location: East TN, USA
Posts: 147
Thanks: 235
Thanked 90 Times in 46 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Yeah, that's exactly what I was going for, but I didn't want to hand-feed it. So, the question becomes, if I'm hammering on one end of a metal rod with a solid base at the other end and with 183.8 ft/lbs of force at a rate of 8000 blows per second, is that going to bend the rod faster or slower than hammering on it with a force of 202.4 ft/lbs at a rate of 7200 times per second. |
|
04-10-2018, 11:33 AM | #8 | |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,509
Thanks: 26,348
Thanked 12,529 Times in 6,205 Posts
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
... Ft/lb is not a unit of force, lb is a unit of force. Combustion forces are more distributed than hitting something with a hammer, unless you have some very thick and soft foam on the end lol. And you are vastly oversimplifying the model. However, to answer that specific question you need a basic understanding of material properties. Steel has what is called a fatigue limit, which is the highest amount of stress a material can endure for an unlimited number of cycles. So as long as your (steel) parts do not exceed that amount of stress, they will last indefinitely. What is most likely going to cause problems for the situation you care about are the bearings. They operate properly by creating an oil film between two parts. That oil film is maintained by oil pressure. Because fluids act on solids via pressure, you need enough pressure and area (PxA=F) to counteract the forces created by both combustion AND inertia. Oil pressure depends on, among other things, the design of the oil pump. The oil pump design usually increases pressure as rom increases up until cavitation occurs, then the output pressure decreases. So that's one reason why I said it depends on original design. Another reason is because the balance of combustion and inertial forces are different between the two situations you were talking about. Worst case forces = combustion/compression force vectors + inertial force vectors Inertial: F=ma. The higher rpms, the higher acceleration. If you have higher forces, you generally need more structure of the same material to withstand it (keeping under the fatigue limit), which in turn makes a bit more force, requiring just a tiny bit more material... Anyway, all this force needs to be supported by the bearings, meaning you need more oil pressure or area. Both of those will further increase forces but let's not go down that rabbit hole too far. Combustion/compression: this is simpler in theory as it starts out as just linear force on the piston. BUT to withstand extra combustion force, you need stronger (heavier) pistons, connecting rods, etc. Which also adds to inertial forces. Which brings us down the rabbit hole again. TLDR:. You are asking a question that can only be 'answered' by years of R&D by hundreds of engineers. There is no definitive answer to your question because it all depends on knowing the exact engine parameters and doing a lot of analysis. If you asked specifically about the FA20 for example, there would be an answer, but I'm not going to do the analysis to figure it out lol. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Spuds For This Useful Post: |
04-10-2018, 12:40 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
E=1/2mv^2 which means the energy of motion goes up dramatically with increasing velocity.
Consider trying to double torque at a given rpm or going from 8psi to 16psi versus trying to add 1000 or 2000rpms to a 7k redline (not doubling anything); it should be obvious which will disintegrate an engine easier. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | TachyonBomb (04-13-2018), Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-10-2018, 12:50 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,806 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | TachyonBomb (04-13-2018), Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-10-2018, 02:36 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 23 BRZ 15 Impreza
Location: NY
Posts: 163
Thanks: 61
Thanked 78 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Check out the Turbocharging Performance Handbook by Jeff Hartman. I seem to recall a formula and an example he talks about, something to the tune of engine wear increases exponentially with rpm.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cueball89 For This Useful Post: | Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
04-10-2018, 04:49 PM | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S Argento
Location: Westport,CT
Posts: 1,855
Thanks: 517
Thanked 1,039 Times in 616 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bfrank1972 For This Useful Post: | Spuds (04-10-2018) |
04-10-2018, 06:39 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2013 frs red
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,517
Thanks: 2,520
Thanked 3,089 Times in 1,654 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Who cares if motors are cheap enough? Anything mechanical will eventually break. I prefer less moving parts.
|
04-10-2018, 06:46 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Drives: 23 BRZ 15 Impreza
Location: NY
Posts: 163
Thanks: 61
Thanked 78 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
A little information from ARP about load and rpm.
Quote:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cueball89 For This Useful Post: | Spuds (04-10-2018), Williampreza (04-10-2018) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OEM internal engine parts + unichip | ndreim | Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons | 3 | 06-22-2016 01:34 PM |
Boost pressure for built engine | ChrisD | Forced Induction | 75 | 01-06-2016 01:24 PM |
boost and internal mods | aquaman | Forced Induction | 15 | 03-13-2015 04:10 PM |
2.5L with lower revs/more torque, or 2.0L with higher revs? | Superhatch | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 124 | 08-28-2013 12:20 PM |
2JZ engine swap on low boost - low 11's run | HighLife | FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 10 | 03-07-2013 05:55 PM |