|
FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING] |
View Poll Results: Should equivalent type of tire be used when comparing lap times of cars? | |||
YES: To accurately compare the cars, equivalent tires should be used. | 75 | 82.42% | |
NO: The tire that came with the car is part "of the car" and should remain unchanged for comparison. | 16 | 17.58% | |
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
09-09-2012, 02:22 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,160
Thanks: 755
Thanked 4,200 Times in 1,803 Posts
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Comparing car lap times: Equal tires?
What is your opinion?
I say that if you are comparing factory cars (ALL OEM) an initial test or comparison should be made as the cars are delivered from the factory for baselines and off-the-lot value etc. However! For sake of the Poll; Question: If comparing cars in which braking, accelerating, cornering and lap times (especially lap times) are compared for the sake of comparing the car; is it or is it not logical to put the cars on equivalent tires? My position: YES. The tires should be the same if not of equivalent performance to most closely get an accurate representation of the different cars as a "whole" that are being compared. example: At my local track a completely stock S2k in my hands can do a 2:06 lap time on Potenza S03's. A FRS on Prius tires does a 2:10 lap time. Considering the performance difference of the tires do I, or do I not have a legitimate representation of the performance difference between the 2 cars? I say I do not. If the FRS was on Potenza S03's (in OEM size) and then turned a 2:08.5 lap time I could definitively say the difference between a stock S2k and a stock FRS is 1.5 seconds and presents an accurate representation of the performance of the 2 cars. |
09-09-2012, 02:42 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 2013 FR-S Ultramarine
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 959
Thanks: 288
Thanked 560 Times in 269 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think it's common knowledge that some manufacturers put really really sticky summer tires on their cars stock so that in magazine reviews they will come out with better numbers even though the suspension design may not be as good as some of the competitors.
Knowing that, I think comparing the grip level the tires provide when looking at lap times is important. I think it's telling that the twins on stock tires are pulling skid pad times and lap times that are comparable to some other performance cars on much stickier tires. Nathan |
09-10-2012, 11:04 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: BRZ Limited Manual
Location: US
Posts: 26
Thanks: 12
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
As long as the fact is disclosed, then I don't have a problem with it. Tires imo, being wear items will have to be replaced anyway, sure it doesn't have to be when the car is purchased though. And if it is disclosed, it is something you can consider having it replaced soon after purchase if there is a lot to be gained from it.
|
09-11-2012, 01:36 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2011 Subaru STI
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 157
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It all depends on what you want out of a review. Tires have a huge effect on performance - heck, I could show you how a RWD car on winter tires could easily outhandle an AWD on summer tires through some snow, but the result would prove nothing about RWD vs. AWD and everything about winter tires vs. summer tires.
To take two cars directly from the manufacturer and compare them "just as they are" usually says nothing about the cars themselves. But mags aren't about to buy several sets of tires for every review to make sure the tires variable is taken out of the equation. Instead, they test them as is and add some fluff piece at the end about "could use better rubber", or something similar to make a statement. So for that reason, the tires should be matched as closely as possible - no new size orrace-only tire, just something with a similar rolling resistance should be fine. But I can't imagine many car mags could afford those kind of costs. |
The Following User Says Thank You to brewksy For This Useful Post: | ~el~jefe~ (01-01-2017) |
09-11-2012, 10:15 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: 2017 Subaru BRZ Perf Pack 6MT
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 5,048
Thanks: 1,949
Thanked 1,945 Times in 1,150 Posts
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Absolutely put them on the same tires. Especially considering factors like these: it's funny you mentioned the Potenza S03, because that tire (AFAIK) is discontinued. So if you were trying to compare an E36 M3, MR2 Turbo, S2000 or any other car that came with these OE tires, you'd have to change them to something else. Putting both cars on the same tread compound gives a "constant" in the comparison that allows the true performance of the car to be tested.
In my opinion, there should be three constants: track conditions (time, weather, temp, altitude), driver, and tires. These ensure the cars are being tested properly and fairly. It also allows us to find faults in the car's systems that may not have surfaced otherwise. For example, if anyone remembers the Car and Driver test where the NISMO 370Z lost it's brakes during a test and crashed into a wall. Nissan/NISMO ended up offering a performance brake pad option for the NISMO Z after that snafu. Had they changed brake pads or fluids this may not have surfaced. In fairness, perhaps after that they could have compared it to other cars while using the NISMO pads to test its performance.
__________________
Current: 2005 Porsche 911 Carrera S 6MT Previous: 2 BRZ's, 997 C2S, C5 RS6, C4 S6, B8 S4, GDB STi, S30 240Z, FC3S RX-7 TII, AW11/SW20 MR2, E30 318is/325i, etc. |
09-11-2012, 11:18 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Toyota Auris
Location: Romania
Posts: 205
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Admin, fatoni's vote was counted thrice!
It's OK if one wants to compare "showroom" cars. But if you want to compare the cars, and not "showroom packages", you must use similar tires. And before anyone would complain this is "unfair" (like not handicapping the weakest horse but allowing it to carry the same weight as the best/fastest one would be regarded as "unfair"): some manufacturers purposely put high grip tires to hide their car's (chassis) deficiencies, and make them look better. Toyota did the opposite. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kunzite For This Useful Post: | rice_classic (09-12-2012) |
09-11-2012, 01:52 PM | #7 |
ლ(ಠ益ಠ)ლ
Join Date: Apr 2010
Drives: E36 5.7 V8
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 1,573
Thanks: 194
Thanked 198 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Same tires FTW. One of the things I loved about hot version and the Tsukuba 5 lap battles was that each car wore semi slicks. Even in the rain LOL...
|
09-11-2012, 01:59 PM | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
manufacturers dont put good tires on cars to hide things, they dont use good tires to look good in comparisons. they use good tires because they want to sell a good car. the post before you, its shown that tires are going to show issues rather than hide them. |
|
09-11-2012, 02:19 PM | #9 |
Reap the BReeZe
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 04 LandShark STi
Location: Texas Mile -198.1mph
Posts: 289
Thanks: 81
Thanked 72 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Even if you use the same brand/type of tire, different cars will have varied sizes. There could even be compound differences across tires in the same line based on size. I don't think it would be worth the expense. If one car is on 285/35s and another is on 205/50s, it still won't tell you much.
|
09-11-2012, 10:28 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2011 Subaru STI
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 157
Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
2: you're naive if you think that car makers don't put extra-grippy tires on a car to mask other deficiencies in a platform. In fact, because tires are such a predominant performance-affecting variable, I'd even better that some car-makers purposefully cut corners with their platform because they know that tires will make up the difference. If we ignore both of our extreme arguments, however, the reality is probably somewhere in the middle - tires have a profound affect on performance and should be negated as much as possible to determine the capabilities of the chassis. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to brewksy For This Useful Post: | rice_classic (09-12-2012) |
09-11-2012, 10:59 PM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: miata, mazdaspeed protege, ls430
Location: socal
Posts: 4,416
Thanks: 599
Thanked 1,442 Times in 787 Posts
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
2: sticky tires generate more force than less sticky tires. what situations are you talking about where less stress is going to show platform deficiencies? the closest thing to a test like this ive seen has been done by the folks over at 949racing and fecompetition. in that test they say this: " In this configuration, the car has way more grip than it does suspension control. Its fast, but sways through corners in a manner that isn’t confidence inspiring when trying to go fast." about using sticky tires on an otherwise stock frs. if companies really thought like that, i would wager that we would see much wider tires coming off the lots. |
|
09-12-2012, 02:33 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: Toyota Auris
Location: Romania
Posts: 205
Thanks: 26
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
fatoni, that was a joke; obviously you can vote at most once.
Please don't forget about my "what is stock" question: is it the Michelin Primacy HP equipped GT 86, or the Bridgestone Turanza equipped one? Manufacturers would do lots of things to hide deficiencies, IMO. Tires, "sport" suspensions, electronic stability controls... this way they can put apparently impressive numbers with a completely unremarkable chassis. Of course, it won't always result in stickier tires being used, and it's not always about performance. The post before me was talking about the undersized brakes of a stock (incl. tires) NISMO 370z, from what I understand. And it was a good thing that such issue was discovered. TheRipler, still it would be better than comparing Turanzas with Yoko A048s, or something. |
09-12-2012, 09:44 AM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
On one of the spectrum, if you work for a car magazine whose audience is the general public, then you should compare cars as they come from the factory (stock tires). Then again, to the general public, track times should mean next to nothing anyway.
On the other end of the spectrum, if you're into autocross or tracking, then you should absolutely compare cars on equivalent tires. Why wouldn't you? Tires are probably one of the most commonly changed-out consummables on cars that see track time and can make a significant difference in handling and laptimes. For any kind of competition event, tires are largely equalized across the board anyway. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DarkSunrise For This Useful Post: | Kunzite (09-12-2012), WolfpackS2k (09-13-2012) |
09-12-2012, 10:55 AM | #14 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: RX8
Location: Earth
Posts: 42
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I would initially agree to equalize the tires to compare cars but from a realistic standpoint it is a modification to change tires from stock. People on this board are biased because, well, it's an FR-S/BRZ board and the car comes with pretty lame tires so of course most will say "well just swap out some good rubber!"
If you look at the Miata the stock suspension is extremely soft and rolly where you could swap in some shocks for the similar price of a set of high performance tires. The 350z/370z both came with terrible brake pads from the factory so naturally most owners would say to swap in some decent pads. Still, as far as modifications go, tires are one of the only ones that can be applied to every car, not just a specific car, which is why I agree that they should be equal among car comparisons in the end. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nameless Performance Equal Length Stepped Header | Jason@Nameless | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 4525 | 11-21-2022 05:38 PM |
Interested in comparing the FT86 to the Silvia? | regal | FR-S / BRZ vs.... | 36 | 11-06-2012 05:59 AM |
FS: Gramlights 57d 17x9 +38 5x114.3 w/ tires 1500 miles on tires, $1800 shipped | apexsti46 | Wheels and Tires | 6 | 09-05-2012 02:54 AM |
To those who keep comparing the FRS to another car on specs... | Moto-P | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 60 | 06-06-2012 08:39 AM |
Comparing front end of the FR-S/FT-86 to BRZ | DIG1992 | FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 66 | 11-21-2011 05:26 PM |