08-27-2022, 11:09 AM | #1051 | |||||
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,432
Thanks: 26,115
Thanked 12,433 Times in 6,148 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
From your 2008 NASA article: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Spuds; 08-27-2022 at 11:47 AM. Reason: Spelling error |
|||||
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Spuds For This Useful Post: |
08-27-2022, 11:55 AM | #1052 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/jo...86-11-1571.xml That 2005 AMS paper was a reasonably conservative conclusion (null hypothesis) for any scientific organization lacking the breath of data we have now. Here is from their website: Quote:
And here is there official position on climate change: https://www.ametsoc.org/index.cfm/am...imate-change1/ What else do you need to see?
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Last edited by Irace86.2.0; 08-27-2022 at 12:09 PM. |
||
08-27-2022, 12:25 PM | #1053 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Among them are also links with different conclusions. I did read the quotes you mentioned, but you're still cherry-picking arguments in your favor. How can someone look at the same info and come to different conclusions. Either they're biased, or lack a full picture of the whole data. It goes both ways for sure.
There are also plenty of dissenting independent studies that are yet to be refuted. What do you make of that? |
08-27-2022, 12:32 PM | #1054 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-27-2022, 12:53 PM | #1055 | |
Airborne at your service
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: '17 BRZ Series.Yellow
Location: El Paso, Texas
Posts: 6,326
Thanks: 4,529
Thanked 5,587 Times in 2,929 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
08-27-2022, 01:01 PM | #1056 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I should add that some of his statements in that article are false like the one below. This position that China is worse really has no bearing. If your neighbor throws litter on your lawn could they say it doesn’t matter because you should focus on the other neighbor who throws more litter? No. We produce more emissions per capita by a factor of two than China that only produces more in total because they have more people, so we all need to be better. Quote:
https://www.assassinationresearch.com/ http://johncostella.com/ Quote:
Meanwhile, your counter evidence is antiquated or dubious at best. Care to try again?
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Last edited by Irace86.2.0; 08-27-2022 at 01:20 PM. |
|||
08-27-2022, 02:24 PM | #1057 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I feel like this is appropriate:
Quote:
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
08-27-2022, 03:36 PM | #1058 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Irace, if you read thru my posts, I said I would post 1 article for now. Obviously I was refering to the journal article, not the opinionated web page. I have been asking you to show me the underlying data & analysis from your links. And we can look beyond the opinions and look at the data objectively, and in a civilized manner. Unfortunately you'll find bias even in the journals (both sides), so if you're willing to be unbiased, we can look at the data together.
|
08-27-2022, 04:12 PM | #1059 | |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,432
Thanks: 26,115
Thanked 12,433 Times in 6,148 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Perhaps we should start here. Which of the following statements do you agree with? 1. The average temperature of Earth's atmosphere is currently increasing. 2. The rate of increase is cause for action to attempt to counteract it. 3. The cause of the increase in temperature is due to excess greenhouse gasses 4. The excess greenhouse gasses include gasses such as CO2 that are made/released due to human activity as well as water vapor. 5. The most common natural greenhouse gas, specifically water vapor has a baseline value which is required for Earth to retain enough heat to be habitable. 6. The total excess of greenhouse gasses (all types) is triggered by a phenomenon where the human made/released greenhouse gasses increase the heat stored and reflected by the atmosphere, which in turn affects the amount of water vapor the atmosphere can store. 7. The increase in water vapor adds to the effect of the manmade greenhouse gasses to further increase the heat stored and reflected by the atmosphere. 8. Humans can mitigate or reverse this phenomenon by reducing the amount of greenhouse gasses they release into the atmosphere. |
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Spuds For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (08-27-2022) |
08-27-2022, 04:25 PM | #1060 |
The Dictater
Join Date: Apr 2017
Drives: '13 Red Scion FRS
Location: MD, USA
Posts: 9,432
Thanks: 26,115
Thanked 12,433 Times in 6,148 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I haven't actually cherry picked anything. I took the most relevant paragraph from the article that explicitly states the conclusion of experts who analyze the presented evidence. These are articles were provided by the very person who is using them as evidence of the complete opposite conclusion. It is pretty solid data across the board in this case.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Spuds For This Useful Post: | ZDan (08-28-2022) |
08-27-2022, 05:40 PM | #1061 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
The data supporting global warming and climate change is also monumental. There is no single study that overwhelmingly demonstrates the theory, nor are there any review papers from a single subject matter/discipline that is going to analyze cumulative data on other disciplines. Even one review paper analyzing one aspect may do a randomized review of hundreds of papers, so it is no small task to demonstrate overwhelmingly anything easily with palatable data, even for the most established theories. The type of report produced by the ICPP is a conglomeration of hundreds if not thousands of studies and presented in a congested format that is palatable for those outside the scientific community. With that said, what do you expect to get presented here that hasn’t been already presented that would satisfy any reasonable expectations you might have?
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
08-27-2022, 06:36 PM | #1062 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,805 Times in 3,299 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I don’t know where Weederr stands on the subject, but what he said is true, which I illustrated above. Any single study presented would be cherry-picking. A review paper of 100+ articles on a single subject matter like economic impact, increased incidence of natural events, co2, methane, sea temperature changes, coral bleaching incidence, rise in extinction numbers, etc is still lacking the breadth of what the cumulative data demonstrates. I think Weederr might just be saying that anyone can prove anything citing a single study, while being able to ignore the 97% consensus among climate scientists. If there was 10,000 articles and 97% were affirming global warming, a person would still have 300 articles to cite in opposition to the overwhelming consensus, so citing a few studies is literally futile, despite our best efforts.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
08-28-2022, 09:03 AM | #1063 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
To keep it short and quick: 1. Yes 2. No, but good luck trying 3. Inconclusive data from me to make a comment 4. No (another one: https://journals.lww.com/health-phys...tivity,.2.aspx) 5. Yes 6. No 7. I am yet to see any convincing evidence on this cyclic behavior, so I don't have an opinion yet 8. No. Eventually, like all stars, sun has its clock ticking too. No point in fighting the natural course of the cosmos. Just so everyone understands, it takes a lot of time and effort to read thru the comments, pick out legit questions, and respond. It's not like I get paid for the time spent. |
|
08-28-2022, 09:25 AM | #1064 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Drives: 2018 BRZ
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 904
Thanks: 1,371
Thanked 768 Times in 435 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Just out of curiosity, what's the plan, then? Assume this has nothing to do with human activity (neither causing it nor being able to reduce the temperature), so we should all just move further and further north/south (and inland) to stay in habitable temperatures (and not get flooded)?
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ohio Enthusiast For This Useful Post: | Irace86.2.0 (08-28-2022) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tcoat banned? | Hotrodheart | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 95 | 07-06-2019 01:46 AM |
Does anyone know why pansontw got banned? | Soloside | Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] | 17 | 10-26-2018 04:20 AM |
Got banned from gf's complex | jdmblood | Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions | 11 | 07-12-2015 12:46 PM |
Why have so many users been banned? | xuimod | Site Announcements / Questions / Issues | 9 | 03-08-2015 02:23 PM |
Banned Toyota GT 86 Advert Banned | Nevermore | FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum | 9 | 11-16-2012 07:27 PM |