follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack

Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack Specific topics relating to wheels and tires.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-01-2021, 01:44 PM   #1
phunky.buddha
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 17 BRZ Premium
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
255/45-17 too weird?

Hey guys, curious about a weird fitment. Search strings are too short for "255" and "255/45" doesn't resolve because of the stupid slash.


Right now I'm sitting at stock height with some new Konig Ampliform 17x9 +40 wheels and my old 255/40-17 S-04s from my S2000. The wheel wells on the BRZ just look SOO big to me. I'll be dropping the car later on RCE Superstreet-1s (never had time to install during lockdown, go fig) but only enough to even out the gap around the tires. No crazy low for me.


Boost is in the very near future, so taller gearing is also a consideration- would 255/45 work out ok in terms of fitment in the wheel wells at +40 offset with a minimal drop? I don't see that size pop up much in the forums since 265/35 on 18s seems to be one of the favorite fitments. Alignments would be track functional but still street friendly (daily driver, HPDEs). This is about the only reference I could find, but maybe my Google-fu just blows, and I wouldn't be anywhere near that low:


https://www.ft86club.com/forums/show....php?p=2851950


The larger size would result in a 4% taller overall gearing, which would offset the 4.9% shorter gearing from the 4.3 diff, so that wouldn't be bad. The gearing on the 2017 just feels so short to me. I know tire selection gets a lot narrower in 255/45 vs 255/40, but Continental and Nitto seem to have some good offerings there.


Thoughts? Sell wheels and just go all in on 265/35-18? 255/40-18?
phunky.buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2021, 09:27 PM   #2
Grady
Senior Member
 
Grady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Drives: BRZ Yellow, 2019 Ranger, 2011 Evora
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,700
Thanks: 354
Thanked 1,485 Times in 779 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
If you are going to boost then larger diameter tires are not an issue. Too large and you gear indicator will not indicated correct. Not a big deal just turn it off but for some reason I like it?

How much HP are you shooting for? 255, 265 tires are probably suited for over 400hp.
Grady is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2021, 10:00 PM   #3
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,188 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I ran 255/40R17 on 17x9 IIRC +35 offset with 4mm spacer for perfect fitment.
Stock is 24.6” diameter 255/40R17 is 25” diameter. That is probably the largest diameter especially on a 17 i would go both for performance, looks, and speedo not being too off.

If gap is too much why not lower the car a little more instead?
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 86TOYO2k17 For This Useful Post:
Wally86 (04-05-2021)
Old 04-02-2021, 01:54 AM   #4
phunky.buddha
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 17 BRZ Premium
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grady View Post
If you are going to boost then larger diameter tires are not an issue. Too large and you gear indicator will not indicated correct. Not a big deal just turn it off but for some reason I like it?

How much HP are you shooting for? 255, 265 tires are probably suited for over 400hp.

I don't have a gear indicator? I assume I can adjust ratios to get accurate speed/distance in an ECUTek program, is that right? Power target is 400 crank, which seems to be a good semi-agressive semi-safe number on 93 octane with an Edelbrock. We'll see.



Quote:
Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 View Post
I ran 255/40R17 on 17x9 IIRC +35 offset with 4mm spacer for perfect fitment.
Stock is 24.6” diameter 255/40R17 is 25” diameter. That is probably the largest diameter especially on a 17 i would go both for performance, looks, and speedo not being too off.

If gap is too much why not lower the car a little more instead?

Thanks for the data point! What were your alignment settings? So you were effectively at +31 offset... which means 275/40 will probably fit too on a +40 with a similar alignment, assuming enough clearance towards the center of the car.


I don't want to go very low- want more room for the suspension to work, maintain close to original geometry, plus clearance for daily driving. Plus to me the perfect stance is an even gap all around the tire, not zero clearance at the top of the fender and widening out as you go down.
phunky.buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2021, 01:27 PM   #5
86TOYO2k17
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Drives: 2017 toyota 86
Location: PNW
Posts: 2,131
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,188 Times in 781 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by phunky.buddha View Post
I don't have a gear indicator? I assume I can adjust ratios to get accurate speed/distance in an ECUTek program, is that right? Power target is 400 crank, which seems to be a good semi-agressive semi-safe number on 93 octane with an Edelbrock. We'll see.






Thanks for the data point! What were your alignment settings? So you were effectively at +31 offset... which means 275/40 will probably fit too on a +40 with a similar alignment, assuming enough clearance towards the center of the car.


I don't want to go very low- want more room for the suspension to work, maintain close to original geometry, plus clearance for daily driving. Plus to me the perfect stance is an even gap all around the tire, not zero clearance at the top of the fender and widening out as you go down.
I just found the spec it was 17x9 +45 with 4mm spacer in rear so effectively +41. +40 would probably be good too though. 17x8 +35 with 225 tire in front.

The rear does have a lot more clearance space than the front, I do think some people have successfully fit a 275/35R17 in the rear. However the main paint for clearance isn't the outside fender especially on stock ride height and you can add a little camber for clearance there if needed, and roll fenders etc... The main clearance point is the spring perch for inside wheel clearance. I think most people switched to coils because they are skinnier and allow for more clearance for the 275 tire, I believe on stock strut 255 is the widest you should run in rear.

I am almost positive you could fit the 255/45r17 in the rear you wanted initially however make sure you get equal diameter in the front. I believe that would be 225/50R17, being on stock ride height should also help fender clearance with that larger diameter, but you may need/want to run a slight amount of camber to be safe.
86TOYO2k17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2021, 10:21 AM   #6
phunky.buddha
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 17 BRZ Premium
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86TOYO2k17 View Post
I just found the spec it was 17x9 +45 with 4mm spacer in rear so effectively +41. +40 would probably be good too though. 17x8 +35 with 225 tire in front.

The rear does have a lot more clearance space than the front, I do think some people have successfully fit a 275/35R17 in the rear. However the main paint for clearance isn't the outside fender especially on stock ride height and you can add a little camber for clearance there if needed, and roll fenders etc... The main clearance point is the spring perch for inside wheel clearance. I think most people switched to coils because they are skinnier and allow for more clearance for the 275 tire, I believe on stock strut 255 is the widest you should run in rear.

I am almost positive you could fit the 255/45r17 in the rear you wanted initially however make sure you get equal diameter in the front. I believe that would be 225/50R17, being on stock ride height should also help fender clearance with that larger diameter, but you may need/want to run a slight amount of camber to be safe.

Got it. Thanks for your specs again!

I already run 255/40 up front at +40 with plenty of clearance, and was running +38 with no issues. I know +35 dropped with street camber seems to clear just fine. I'll be on coilovers, so I'm not worried about tire vs spring clearance. Guess I'll just have to go in and measure.
phunky.buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2021, 01:54 PM   #7
rixter145
Sleep Chomper
 
rixter145's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Drives: BRZ
Location: Mill Creek
Posts: 312
Thanks: 258
Thanked 98 Times in 66 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grady View Post
If you are going to boost then larger diameter tires are not an issue. Too large and you gear indicator will not indicated correct. Not a big deal just turn it off but for some reason I like it?

How much HP are you shooting for? 255, 265 tires are probably suited for over 400hp.
Are you running 265/40/17? Sorry to hijack thread, but i'm also looking to widen up. Will be running a bit north of 400 whp on e85 so need to prepare for it.
rixter145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2021, 03:59 PM   #8
phunky.buddha
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Drives: 17 BRZ Premium
Location: DFW Metro, TX
Posts: 21
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rixter145 View Post
Are you running 265/40/17? Sorry to hijack thread, but i'm also looking to widen up. Will be running a bit north of 400 whp on e85 so need to prepare for it.
255/40 right now. I thought about 265/40 before on the S2k, but there really aren't many tires available in that size if at all for any given year. Your E85 target sounds like it scales right with my 93 octane gas target.
phunky.buddha is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to phunky.buddha For This Useful Post:
rixter145 (04-09-2021)
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Weird OFT issue omfg5041 Software Tuning 2 12-05-2016 12:53 PM
All the weird acronyms ichitaka05 Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 60 04-04-2016 08:51 PM
Weird O2 readings sw20kosh Software Tuning 22 05-15-2014 06:49 PM
is it weird? slidethis Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 11 01-14-2013 02:07 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.