Autocar GT86 First Drive

[ZeeSpeed]

http://www.autocar.co.uk/CarReviews/...-Coupe/260227/


What is it?

This is the Toyota GT 86, formerly known as the FT-86, and created to lure young, fun-loving drivers back to a Toyota brand that has become dominated by big-selling but ultimately bland models.

The front-engined, rear-drive 2+2 has been created in a close collaboration with Subaru, in which Toyota owns a 16.5 per cent share, and will spawn three mechanically identical but differently styled cars: the GT 86, the Subaru BRZ and, for the American market, the Scion FR-S.

All three will be powered by the same 197bhp, 151lb ft flat four engine. Based on the Subaru FB20 block but fitted with a Toyota-designed head, the 2.0-litre engine has been reworked with a shorter stroke and wider bores, allowing it to rev higher. Maximum power arrives at 7000rpm, while peak torque is at 6600rpm.

In total, 91 per cent of parts are bespoke to the GT 86 or its counterparts. Current estimates suggest it will cost from £28,000, a significantly higher amount than originally speculated, but still a relative bargain should it deliver on its promised fun.

What’s it like?

At this juncture it’s worth noting that our drive was conducted at a test track in Japan, where the silky smooth surface made any conclusions about the ride impossible to gauge accurately. Also, this is a pre-production car, set up to almost launch spec save for the fitment of details such as the audio system.

Sliding into the GT 86’s bucket seats – which are snug, grippy and positioned at a perfect, low-slung height – sets the tone. With all the controls close to hand, the ****pit is as cosseting as a Porsche’s, albeit not trimmed to the same standard.

At idle, the engine note is fairly subdued, but take it up to the 7500rpm redline and it sounds growly. However, this car is all about the corners. Its relatively low power means it’s no sprint champion, and the 0-62mph time is estimated at a modest 7.0sec.

But the key facets of an 1180kg kerb weight, rear-wheel drive, ESP that can be fully turned off, quick steering and a limited-slip differential make it a riot in the twisty stuff. Also, the tyres are the same 17in low-resistance versions as can be found on a Prius, all the better to make sure their grip can be overcome if the mood takes you.

Turn in to a corner and there is some roll, but it’s well contained. On a constant throttle and steady steering, it understeers slightly, but lift mid-corner or trail the brakes – or just throw it in – and it’ll either straighten its line or flick to oversteer as you choose.

Furthermore, it never catches you out when it does start to slide because the steering is so nicely weighted and the chassis so responsive that they telegraph exactly what’s happening at all times.

There are disappointments, but they are minor. The six-speed manual gearbox is a touch notchy, while the optional six-speed automatic changes smoothly and quickly but lacks the sharpness of its dual-clutch rivals. When it’s on, the stability control system also intervenes too harshly.
Should I buy one?

Despite this, at its best, the driving experience is a match for the likes of a Porsche Cayman, and accolades don’t come much higher than that. That it can’t reach those heights across as broad a range of conditions as the German-built car shouldn’t detract from its overall success, because the fact that it can even get close is a minor miracle.

Hidemitsu Hoshiga

Toyota GT 86

Price: £28,000 (est); Top speed: 143mph (est); 0-62mph: 7.0sec (est); Economy: 40.9mpg (est, combined); CO2: 160g/km (est); Kerb weight: 1180kg; Engine: 4 cyls horizontally opposed, 1998cc, petrol; Installation: Front, longitudinal, RWD; Power: 197bhp at 7000rpm; Torque: 151lb ft at 6600rpm; Gearbox: 6-spd manual; Length: 4240mm; Height: 1285mm; Wheelbase: 2570mm; Wheels: 7Jx17in; Tyres: 215/45 R17.
Enjoy!

[Buggy51]

Holy crap, the news is just zooming by lol

I just hope the American FR-S/BRZ isn't at that price point or I'm going to hurl.

[yayforaddison]

Today is the day my post count goes up... 3 great revealings within about an hour <3

[iff2mastamatt]

Open the floodgates!

[Jezza_hr]

It's been a while since I've been around these parts, but if the GT86 comes in at the price they're suggesting for a UK spec, I think I may either wait or look to import from Japan. My expectations were in the low 20s unfortunately

[Buggy51]

Originally Posted by iff2mastamatt

Open the floodgates!

For the horde?

[ZeeSpeed]

Absolutely! Autocar have obviously driven the JDM version. Would be nice to know more about what trim levels/grades, options, colours etc now too!

[old greg]

£28,000 (est)

0-62mph: 7.0sec (est)

WTF? Srsly?

[Buggy51]

Originally Posted by old greg

WTF? Srsly?

Should I buy one?

Despite this, at its best, the driving experience is a match for the likes of a Porsche Cayman, and accolades don’t come much higher than that. That it can’t reach those heights across as broad a range of conditions as the German-built car shouldn’t detract from its overall success, because the fact that it can even get close is a minor miracle.


eh?

[old greg]

Originally Posted by Buggy51

eh?

28k pounds would imply ~$35k US. So I repeat, WTF? Srsly?

[yayforaddison]

Anyone else notice that 40.9 mpg at the bottom of the page?!

[dalli]

Originally Posted by Buggy51

Should I buy one?

Despite this, at its best, the driving experience is a match for the likes of a Porsche Cayman, and accolades don’t come much higher than that. That it can’t reach those heights across as broad a range of conditions as the German-built car shouldn’t detract from its overall success, because the fact that it can even get close is a minor miracle.


eh?

exactly wtf...

[Buggy51]

Originally Posted by old greg

28k pounds would imply ~$35k US. So I repeat, WTF? Srsly?

I don't disagree with you on the pound price. I'm okay with a slightly slower car for 0-60 just I'm balking at the price. Reduce it by $12k and I'll be sold.

I'm seriously hoping that's all VAT >_>

[Buggy51]

Originally Posted by yayforaddison

Anyone else notice that 40.9 mpg at the bottom of the page?!

... shouldn't it be per liter? o_O;