|
Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) Discussions about cosmetic mods. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Drives: 2014 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: California
Posts: 23
Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Smoked Tail-Lights Legal in CA?
Does anyone have any experience about running aftermarket DOT approved tail lights in California (TOMS, etc) and still managing to get pulled over? I wanted a better look than my stock tail's and heard that others have been pulled over for aftermarkets. If they are DOT approved, such as TOMS, can a cop legally give me a ticket considering they have the side markers?
Also, is tinting/getting a smoked rear bumper light illegal such as the Valenti? I know the tinted/smoked rear tail lights are illegal but how about the bumper light? link: https://modbargains.com/valenti-led-...u-brz-zn6-zc6/ Last edited by Reasy; 03-03-2020 at 01:01 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 2015 BRZ
Location: SF
Posts: 69
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Valenti tail lights aren't legal because they are not DOT approved. There are no legal darkened tail lights. Darkening headlights would also be illegal. You can be pulled over for everything you mentioned at any time after you install them. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,290 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2498 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
There is no legal requirement for the "bumper light" as it is actually just your reverse lights and a reflector. You can do whatever you want with it.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,807 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
I see nothing in the CVC that says darkening headlights or taillights is illegal, as long as the lights perform per the code. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...r=2.&article=2. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/f...r=2.&article=3.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,807 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I should add. I have smoked front markers with amber LED bulbs. They are also legal.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
ProCrastinationConsultant
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 Ranger, '18 Tacoma 4Dr LB
Location: chicago-ish
Posts: 11,330
Thanks: 35,240
Thanked 13,675 Times in 6,782 Posts
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
darkening any lighting assembly would be a modification of the housing. federal standards prohibit any modifications to the housings.
but the thing to remember is that no one is getting pulled over for a set of tail lights. you have to be doing something notable for the cop to become annoyed/concerned/irritated enough to make it worth his effort. if you blend in, no modification is noticed enough to justify being pulled over.
__________________
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to soundman98 For This Useful Post: | Tcoat (03-05-2020) |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,807 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I’ve been pulled over for tint and a clear license plate cover before (used to protect against rocks), but I have never had any lights ticketed during those stops.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
Last edited by Irace86.2.0; 03-04-2020 at 08:15 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Certs You Dont Care About
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2013 Galaxy Blue BRZ
Location: Milwaukee, WI / Tampa, FL
Posts: 230
Thanks: 34
Thanked 131 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Assuming is dangerous. Don't do it! Especially if you're asking for someone else to look into the law based on that assumption.
Quote:
Putting any aftermarket lighting on a car (or modifying factory lenses) is always questionable in terms of the law, if not straight up a violation of it. Just like, technically speaking, any exhaust modification can also be viewed as a violation. It's the calculated risk that anyone who does these modifications takes. I would be hesitant to ever imply otherwise. This is why personally, I keep the factory sets of any lights I replace so that if I do get cited for it, I can just swap them out and show it was repaired and get the ticket removed. All that said, if you don't cause problems on the road, you won't draw attention. If you don't draw attention, things like this won't be an issue. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to sharpsicle For This Useful Post: | Tcoat (03-05-2020) |
![]() |
#9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,807 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Any modifications from the cats back is California smog legal and anything under 95db is not violating exhaust noise laws, so not a violation as you say. Lighting laws are often written in a way that specifies the amount of lights, the location and the minimum performance. Just to give an example, the front markers need to be amber in California (white or amber in many states), but there is only a specification that it illuminates amber when it is on at night. It can be an amber housing with a white bulb or a white/smoked housing with an amber bulb; it just needs to light up amber. It also needs to be seen from 500ft away. Tinting would seem to be a problem then, except my LED bulb is brighter than the incandescent bulb. Moreover, a candle can be seen from like a mile away at night, so most modifications would be more than bright enough. Mild tinting LED lights is likely going to do very little to prevent them from performing as needed.
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Irace86.2.0 For This Useful Post: | Will BRZ (03-06-2020) |
![]() |
#10 | |
ProCrastinationConsultant
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '14 Ranger, '18 Tacoma 4Dr LB
Location: chicago-ish
Posts: 11,330
Thanks: 35,240
Thanked 13,675 Times in 6,782 Posts
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
this is what i'm referencing: fmvss 108 https://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/TP-108-13.pdf page 2, #2: general requirements: "Each vehicle shall be equipped with at least the number of lamps, reflective devices, and associated equipment specified in the Standard, and required equipment shall be designed to conform to the SAE Standards or Recommended Practices referenced in the Standard as applicable. " an alteration of the light output of the assembly would mean it cannot perform to the SAE standards as originally designed. the massively short overview of fmvss 108 is specifically that it is contractor/manufacturer-based. meaning that individuals can't get an altered lighting assembly tested and verified in any capacity. i have actually tried. i was quoted "over $10,000" by one testing company to verify my modified eclipse tail lights, and then they refused to communicate with me after that. they literally didn't want to even talk to me about it. the other important aspect is that fmvss testing is an all-or-nothing affair. they do not allow just re-testing photometric efficiency. change an incandescent bulb to an led bulb, and the lighting assembly must go through the entire output, vibration, moisture, dust, corrosion, plastic optical tests, and heat test cycles. despite the fact that the housing can already have certification within any or all of those categories. the test proceedure is specifically worded and oriented for the procedure of manufacturing thousands of that specific lighting assembly. there are no provisions within the code to allow for a one-off design that you or i would design for our vehicles. also critical is that manufacturers self-certify any lighting assembly they make, and then it's a convoluted process to try to get them reported, tested, and fined for not meeting the standards. it's literally how valenti stays in business all the while making absolute garbage housings with crap led's... it's an incredibly obtuse system dreamed up by politicians, and lawyers, and it shows in every way. it's also the reason we can't have led headlights like the europeans... but the reason you haven't been ticketed is because the reality is that tinted tail lights aren't doing drive-bys, or dealing drugs. they don't contribute to speeding tickets, or fulfill any politicians desire to be chased. so lighting laws largely exist, but are ignored because they aren't considered a huge deal by most. in a lot of ways, it's sort of like marijuana. federally, it's still illegal, but everyone's starting to figure out there's bigger fish to deal with. that doesn't make modified lighting any less illegal, which means that if a cop were to get a stick up their butt, it's completely fair game for them to go after. but at this point, it's something that exists in the margins enough that it doesn't matter to most to justify pursuing. my point in telling people about the legality issue is awareness. i still modify my lighting. but i do so more carefully to attempt to maintain oem brightness levels. my goals have never been to obscure my lights, which was the original intent on getting my eclipse lights certified, until they cut me off due to me not being a manufacturer. believe me, i want a way to certify my lights. i don't like existing in the margins, waiting for freshly minted badge to press his luck. the europeans have specific tests that any body shop has tools to test and pass/fail any headlight-- they have a very easy time modifying housings and getting them to pass certification once a very basic set of requirements are met. the US doesn't have any of that.
__________________
"The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to soundman98 For This Useful Post: | Will BRZ (03-06-2020), x808drifter (03-06-2020) |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Don't speak that general about all europeans. For example, there is germany where everything needs to be TUV certified to be road legal, which also is expensive, which is reason few manufacturers go for. Just like in US, where in different states there can be differing set of regulations, there can be differences among EU members.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post: | soundman98 (03-06-2020) |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: Q5 + BRZ + M796
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7,884
Thanks: 5,668
Thanked 5,807 Times in 3,300 Posts
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
__________________
My Build | K24 Turbo Swap | *K24T BRZ SOLD*
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Drives: 2014 GT86
Location: Latvia, Riga
Posts: 4,333
Thanks: 696
Thanked 2,086 Times in 1,436 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Exceeding standards isn't always right thing in all cases. Standards may also be failed with too "good"/"strong"/whatever output, that for example blinds oncoming traffic and such. In several cases best quality might not be "exceeding" but rather how close to required something is, not below and neither above. In case of light elements, if (to save on design/manufacturing costs) eg. reflector and bulb type stays same, i can easily imagine for tinted light to fail standards, no matter how high quality/compliant original part was. And if tinted is fine, may mean that original might be way off, and rises questions how it was tested/certified.
Still .. i hate a bit approach in general, when people for sake of minor visual looks change are willing to sacrifice safety or function. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to churchx For This Useful Post: | soundman98 (03-06-2020) |
![]() |
#14 |
LMGTFY
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 13 FRS, 91 Miata
Location: Lava Town, HI
Posts: 2,776
Thanks: 5,561
Thanked 3,648 Times in 1,625 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
While he refers to headlights, the same applies for tinting your tails.
google "CVC 26101" You'll find many people getting tickets for tinted tails. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to x808drifter For This Useful Post: | soundman98 (03-06-2020) |
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: TOM'S DOT Legal LED Tail Lights | andy86 | Exterior Parts (Aero, Lighting, Etc.) | 0 | 11-07-2017 05:51 PM |
WTT OEM tail lights practically new for Spyder V2 tail lights smoked red | KungFuWaffle | Exterior Parts (Aero, Lighting, Etc.) | 1 | 06-10-2015 01:26 PM |
FS: Tom's DOT Legal LED Tail Lights | Covo_86 | NY / NJ / CT / PA | 5 | 05-14-2014 12:09 PM |
US legal tail lights | Khazzy | Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) | 16 | 08-04-2013 02:15 PM |