![]() |
#1443 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1444 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So I should be leaving it to run that rich since no eflex sensor?
I've been filling from the same station for 2 years and its been really consistent. Its been causing Fine Block corrections upto 1.4 degrees due to the rich condition (I know this cause its leaner now and has much less severe FBKC) and idle has the slight hesitation sometimes. My intentions were to get it fine tuned for my station but still be slightly rich for safety in case. Still unsure as to why it reads -6% LTFT when its clearly running leaner than Commanded AFR in some instances Edit: If e85 consumes 30% more fuel than e0 then e70 would consume 24.7% more than e0. 5.3% would be the fueling error if I put e70 in a perfectly scaled e85 tune. Im guessing this is how it goes Last edited by 504; 12-19-2016 at 09:20 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1445 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
In open loop? If so, do I need to elaborate?
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1446 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1447 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
check your closed loop AFR tables A and B make sure their are negative values in all cells . Positive or zero values cause weird issues. As its an offset of 14.7, its strange your target afr is leaner than 14.7, usually the ecu wont do that. unless its a logging issue |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to steve99 For This Useful Post: | 504 (12-21-2016) |
![]() |
#1448 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Its all logged through tactrix using supplied txt file but some parameters were removed for faster refresh times. I've updated the file now so I'll find out pretty soon if logging was an issue |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1449 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: Toyota 86 GTS
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,129
Thanks: 453
Thanked 895 Times in 424 Posts
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
1. Don't waste everyone's time on logs taken before the car is even remotely warm.
2. There's no such thing as lean in closed loop, particularly not at what you're showing is idle, and especially not while the car is in cat warm up mode. 3. See 1. Why do you think I specify oil temp must be logged. 4. E85 is nowhere near 30% more than E0. It's closer to (or greater than) 40% more. It's just the yanks that don't bother to baseline anything as E0 and confuse the rest of the world by comparing E85 to E8-15. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1450 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
I can't emphasise how much respect I have for your contributions you've made to this platform particularly in the software aspect of cars where most of us wouldn't dare venture into; I just wish the information was delivered in a less aggressive tone. If I was asking "does the brz seat fit on frs", sure I'll accept being roasted. But this stuff most of us aren't particularly knowledgeable about with very limited information available online to leech off. You're Right about point 1 where the car wasn't warm in the log screenshot posted earlier. However, I did attach a log along with the tune in my last post from a 30-minute drive that shows that the concern is pretty consistent throughout the entire drive. [my understanding] [open to discussion] In regards to fueling, If pure ethanol has a stoichiometric ratio of 9:1 and gasoline 14.7:1, E100 would be 38.78% richer, E85 would be 32.96% richer and E70 would be 27.14% richer. Either way, I found it odd how an E85 tune yielded 13% rich on E70. Happy Holidays everyone |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1451 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2016 Asphalt FR-S, 2008 E90 335i
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Merry Christmas/happy holidays forum dwellers.
Some background: I filled up with E85 for the first time a bit over a week ago. I was initially just going test how the car felt, but, I honestly don't think I can go back to the pisswater CA 91. Anyway, I've been taking it pretty easy to get the fuel trims set. Just filled up my second tank and I would wager my ethanol mix is right around 75% based on the trims. I finally got a decent data logging session when it wasn't raining down here. Here's the full graph: http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...6?log=0&data=1 And the three WOT 3rd gear pulls for those uninterested in socal city driving: http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=4271-4385 http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=4831-4937 http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=5493-5595 My analysis: I do have some FLKC at rpm > ~7k. Not enough to drop IAM, but ~1.3-2.6 degrees at times. I probably should pull a touch of timing. Fuel trims look decent. Not as close to true 85% ethanol as I would like, but it probably won't matter much. My AFR seems to vary quite a bit from its commanded value during the WOT pulls. A 0.75 difference in some places. Is this normal? If anyone is interested, I would greatly appreciate feedback on the data and my analysis. Cheers! ![]() *Edit* Here's two more WOT pulls for everyone's viewing pleasure. http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=2538-2634 http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=3390-3507 Last edited by Blue_Elite; 12-26-2016 at 02:52 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1452 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2016 Asphalt FR-S, 2008 E90 335i
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Bump bump.
Here's two more pulls! http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=6311-6435 http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...zoom=7091-7190 Trims in the CL city driving look very nice. Knock at RPM > 6500 appears negligible at this point. I see some lean spikes at low RPM during WOT pulls though. I'll keep going until the grenade goes off or somebody tells me otherwise. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1453 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
It's the transient condition and the delay of the O2 sensor location. As the throttle opens, the sudden increase of air will make it go lean briefly, the O2 just detects this with a delay so appears a few lines later in the logs. You can try and increase tip in fueling a little but to see if it helps.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger Kodename 47 DJ: Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Kodename47 For This Useful Post: | Blue_Elite (12-28-2016) |
![]() |
#1454 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Drives: 2016 Asphalt FR-S, 2008 E90 335i
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 38
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Me again.
http://datazap.me/u/jevenson123/log-...7?log=0&data=1 I got around to installing my JDL UEL catless header. I absolutely butchered the secondary O2 sensor threads. I managed to tap & die the threads and really wedged it in there. No leaks that I can tell. I'm also running on E85 w/ OFT. Took this log after learning the trims for a couple weeks. I am actually very pleased with how this turned out. CL fuel trims dip a bit far in the negative (rich). This appears to be low E% and is probably not an issue. OL performance looks good. AFR following commanded and knock is minimal. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1455 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 1UZ VVTI Swapped
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
http://www.datazap.me/u/dogwhistle19...s?log=0&data=1 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1456 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: frs
Location: Gunsai
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 7,380
Thanked 2,957 Times in 1,792 Posts
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
http://www.datazap.me/u/teseo/log-14...og=0&data=1-12
Running Stg 2 UEL with 93oct. Stock intake, stock air filter also. @steve99 or @Wayno can chime in? Thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RGM Supercharged 86 performance data | TheGooseman | AFRICA | 14 | 12-13-2014 02:15 AM |
Interpreting Ecutek Data Logs? | cuddefred | Software Tuning | 3 | 09-02-2013 01:55 PM |
VIR - Impressions/Pics/Logs/Video (Track Daze) | swift996 | Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting | 39 | 08-30-2013 10:21 AM |
Noise tube delete air/fuel logs? | jm1681 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 13 | 10-17-2012 05:57 PM |
ECU Data Logger | Motordyne | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 5 | 07-18-2012 10:27 AM |