follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


View Poll Results: How many 86 owners are planning on getting the Supra?
I'm definitely getting one 32 12.17%
I might get one if they offer a MT 100 38.02%
No, not me. 131 49.81%
Voters: 263. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-20-2021, 08:03 PM   #3011
blackhawkdown
Senior Member
 
blackhawkdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2012 WRX, 2003 RSX Type S
Location: TN, AK, VA, S. Korea, NC
Posts: 451
Thanks: 12
Thanked 284 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
2020 Toyota GR Supra Revealed!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
IMS issue wasn't overblown. Thousands of destroyed engine, Porsche had to be taken to court, where they lost. 8% failure rate on the small singlerow bearing design used from 2000-2005. 8%, is HUGE. Exceedingly stupid design...

At least if you do have overconsumption of oil, you can continually add oil and not have the engine self-destruct! I'd call this Supra problem WAY more benign...

It’s less than 1% not 8%. Roughly around 16,000 987.1 caymans were sold. 1% of 16000 is 160 cars. So yeah, exaggerated.

B58 motors acceptance level for oil consumption is 1qt for every 1000 miles. Which a lot of these Supras are well within the limit. There has been only two Supras that I know of that has gotten an engine replacement.

That being said, oil consumption is over exaggerated.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
saying they wanted to add weight to improve handling is like saying people wear condoms to improve sex.
blackhawkdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2021, 08:35 PM   #3012
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swift View Post
I wont quote the few posts above, however in regards to Sigma/data statistics, if today's manufacturer can't hold plus/minus .001" they are doing something wrong. My guess is the oil control ring/rings are to weak. Subaru has this problem in many of their engines because they want to run the thin oil while having as little as friction as possible to maximize MPG! They went so far as to replace the rings with different ones after 2015 in Legacy models and others...still have our issues especially if downshifting during spirited driving.
This isn't a Subaru engine so not even remotely relevant.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2021, 09:10 PM   #3013
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
It’s less than 1% not 8%. Roughly around 16,000 987.1 caymans were sold. 1% of 16000 is 160 cars. So yeah, exaggerated.
Was somewhat more of a 986/996 problem much more so than 987.1/997.1. Earlier dual-row bearings and later bigger 9x7.1 single-row bearings had a lower failure rate. 2001-2005 according to my sources had the highest failure rates, reportedly on the order of 8-10%.
https://www.oregonpca.org/ims-saga/
https://www.sportscarmarket.com/colu...porsche-owners

Add to the IMS failures D-chunk, bore-scoring, and poor oiling (one of our own lost his 987.1 Cayman S to this), those engines were kinda garbage...

Different league of problem levels vs. 1qt/1000 mile oil consumption.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2021, 09:20 PM   #3014
blackhawkdown
Senior Member
 
blackhawkdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2012 WRX, 2003 RSX Type S
Location: TN, AK, VA, S. Korea, NC
Posts: 451
Thanks: 12
Thanked 284 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Was somewhat more of a 986/996 problem much more so than 987.1/997.1. Earlier dual-row bearings and later bigger 9x7.1 single-row bearings had a lower failure rate. 2001-2005 according to my sources had the highest failure rates, reportedly on the order of 8-10%.
https://www.oregonpca.org/ims-saga/
https://www.sportscarmarket.com/colu...porsche-owners

Add to the IMS failures D-chunk, bore-scoring, and poor oiling (one of our own lost his 987.1 Cayman S to this), those engines were kinda garbage...

Different league of problem levels vs. 1qt/1000 mile oil consumption.

The Supra does not have consumption oil issues. Normal operation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
saying they wanted to add weight to improve handling is like saying people wear condoms to improve sex.
blackhawkdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2021, 10:00 PM   #3015
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
The Supra does not have consumption oil issues. Normal operation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That was kind of my point from the time you said "overblown, just like IMS failures".

No, engines consuming a bit of oil is not at all comparable to IMS bearings disintegrating and destroying engines...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 11:39 AM   #3016
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
The Supra does not have consumption oil issues. Normal operation.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
i believe you own a 2020 and so far those aren't the ones with the issues.
gymratter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2021, 01:21 PM   #3017
beltax90
Senior Member
 
beltax90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2010 corolla
Location: california
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 1,520
Thanked 1,798 Times in 780 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
beltax90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2021, 08:56 PM   #3018
Swift
I just Drive.
 
Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: in the womb still
Location: WI/MN
Posts: 299
Thanks: 0
Thanked 116 Times in 86 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Okay as one of the few on this board as an ACTUAL mechanic and an ACTUAL machinist..




1) OEMs claim the 1qt oil burned everyone 1000miles and as a way to protect themselves from lawsuits. Ever hear of the legendary 22RE motor or quite frankly any older toyota engine. Fucker could have 300,000miles and not burn that much...but a brand new ford explor


2) If Subaru had oil control ring problems because they were not strong enough resistance due to them trying to reduce friction to hit higher MPG , you really think another OEM didn't fuck that up either??
__________________
-Waiting patiently for the right FT-86...

-92' Acura Legend 5spd coupe twin turbo project
Swift is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Swift For This Useful Post:
gymratter (04-29-2021), Tokay444 (04-30-2021)
Old 04-28-2021, 08:49 AM   #3019
WolfpackS2k
Senior Member
 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Was somewhat more of a 986/996 problem much more so than 987.1/997.1. Earlier dual-row bearings and later bigger 9x7.1 single-row bearings had a lower failure rate. 2001-2005 according to my sources had the highest failure rates, reportedly on the order of 8-10%.
https://www.oregonpca.org/ims-saga/
https://www.sportscarmarket.com/colu...porsche-owners

Add to the IMS failures D-chunk, bore-scoring, and poor oiling (one of our own lost his 987.1 Cayman S to this), those engines were kinda garbage...

Different league of problem levels vs. 1qt/1000 mile oil consumption.
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R
WolfpackS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2021, 05:49 PM   #3020
beltax90
Senior Member
 
beltax90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2010 corolla
Location: california
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 1,520
Thanked 1,798 Times in 780 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
formula supra progress
Attached Images
 
beltax90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2021, 06:38 PM   #3021
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
gymratter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2021, 06:58 PM   #3022
Jordanwolf
Rice King
 
Jordanwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Drives: '19 FWD master race CTR
Location: The land of the North
Posts: 2,887
Thanks: 1,079
Thanked 2,001 Times in 1,203 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by beltax90 View Post
formula supra progress
..... I didn't think the hood line could get any uglier... I stand corrected.
__________________
Glorious Honda.
Know my 5x120 GREATNESS PEASANTS.
Jordanwolf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jordanwolf For This Useful Post:
Vides990 (05-12-2021)
Old 04-29-2021, 07:20 PM   #3023
vh_supra26
Site Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)


vh_supra26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2021, 09:03 PM   #3024
beltax90
Senior Member
 
beltax90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2010 corolla
Location: california
Posts: 1,404
Thanks: 1,520
Thanked 1,798 Times in 780 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordanwolf View Post
..... I didn't think the hood line could get any uglier... I stand corrected.
I think it's pretty cool!
beltax90 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2020 Toyota 86??? Twin-Dragons Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 225 01-02-2019 12:33 PM
Official: Nissan Concept 2020 Vision Gran Turismo revealed, hints future R36 GT-R vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 42 01-17-2016 02:28 AM
Nissan 2020 vs Toyota FT-1 vs Acura NSX vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 35 07-08-2014 05:15 PM
Modellista Toyota 86 Revealed quik1987 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 385 12-04-2011 04:51 PM
Breaking! Toyota FT-86 II revealed? A-Spike Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 40 02-13-2011 06:16 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.