follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 2nd Gens: GR86 and BRZ > GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86)

GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) General topics for the GR86 second-gen 86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2024, 11:38 AM   #1
Tomyyyu
Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Drives:
Posts: 79
Thanks: 19
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
UEL vs EL - 2nd Gen 86. Which is better?

I’m reaching out for some guidance on header options for my 2023 GR86, which I primarily use for autocross. I’ve been looking into both equal-length and unequal-length headers but am uncertain which would provide the best performance for my setup, particularly in an autocross environment.

I understand that unequal-length headers are known for enhancing mid-range torque, while equal-length headers can provide better top-end gains. Given the frequent acceleration and lower top speeds in autocross, I’m wondering which would be more advantageous for my specific needs. Additionally, I’d appreciate any insights on how each option might affect drivability and overall performance.

Based on this video: [MEDIA=youtube]oMjJgCpFhOs[/MEDIA] Seems to me like when tuned the equal and unequal are the same at the top range. The only benefit I see is the unequal gains you more at the midrange.

In addition, don’t forget that Verus is open to making the pan fit the UEL JDL headers. As well as possibly formula delta. [MEDIA=youtube]eBHT5b3sf9o[/MEDIA]

Is there heat concerns with certain cylinder banks, due to it being unequal? Since half the cylinders will be hotter than the others due to the run length of the headers to the cylinders 1&3 and 2&4.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Last edited by Tomyyyu; 10-29-2024 at 01:00 PM.
Tomyyyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2024, 08:22 AM   #2
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,635
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 3,968 Times in 2,073 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think what you might *really* want to consider is EL vs. 4->2->1. I think the only benefits of UEL are 1. easier to design and fit a UEL header underneath a flat engine and 2. "boxer rumble".

Regarding EL vs. 4>2>1, a few years back a friend got a Tomei EL header and I got an ACE 350 4-2-1 with the longer more torquey tubes for the 2-1 part. Both 2017 cars. We both got good tunes, and then dynoed on the same day at the same place. He made 185hp and I made 179. But his torque dip was same or maybe worse than stock, while my torque dip was totally filled in and actually I made more peak torque around 4800 than he made anywhere.

At the track, my car was easier to extract quicker lap times due to more torque exiting corners and also more options (some corners where he *had* to go to 2nd, I could torque through in 3rd and save both a downshift and a costly upshift).

Anyway, my 0.02...

Last edited by ZDan; 10-30-2024 at 11:40 AM.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
MrSkubi (10-30-2024), NoHaveMSG (10-31-2024), ruturaj001 (11-01-2024), Tatsu333 (10-30-2024)
Old 10-30-2024, 10:59 AM   #3
MrSkubi
Senior Member
 
MrSkubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Drives: 17 BRZ ,21 GR Yaris, 23 GR86
Location: Poland
Posts: 163
Thanks: 414
Thanked 144 Times in 83 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Just wondering - which 4->2->1 header is the one to go with FA24 ? JDL; SME or something else ? Is overpipe considered to be a restriction on Gen. 2 cars ?
MrSkubi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2024, 12:59 PM   #4
Ernest72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Drives: 16 Silver BRZ, 04 Silver WRX wagon
Location: Rockland county, NY
Posts: 1,420
Thanks: 184
Thanked 774 Times in 444 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Everything I have read says the 4-2-1 always performs better. So get that then UEl next.
Ernest72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2024, 01:15 PM   #5
RToyo86
Senior Member
 
RToyo86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Drives: 17 Asphalt 86
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,272
Thanks: 1,807
Thanked 2,395 Times in 1,205 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrSkubi View Post
Just wondering - which 4->2->1 header is the one to go with FA24 ? JDL; SME or something else ? Is overpipe considered to be a restriction on Gen. 2 cars ?
From what we've seen on 2nd gen the header doesn't seem to matter nearly as much as it did on first gen.
If you aren't in the states go with whatever is most cost effective.
RToyo86 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RToyo86 For This Useful Post:
MrSkubi (10-31-2024)
Old 10-30-2024, 01:28 PM   #6
Tomyyyu
Member
 
Join Date: May 2023
Drives:
Posts: 79
Thanks: 19
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Seems like you also have to also consider the oil pans that can fit.

SME pan fits the SME header

Formula Delta pan TBD what headers fit last I saw

Verus Pan seems like it would fit JDL UEL (but you do need to put a few taps in the runners to get it to fit, last they shared with the community).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tomyyyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2024, 05:43 PM   #7
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,635
Thanks: 1,418
Thanked 3,968 Times in 2,073 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would not bet against the OEM header for power. But for midrange, losing the 1st cat and going 4-2-1 with long 2-1 tubes should gain you some midrange. But honestly $$$ might be better spent elsewhere!
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
bcj (11-03-2024), ruturaj001 (11-03-2024), Tomyyyu (10-30-2024)
Old 11-03-2024, 12:56 AM   #8
ruturaj001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Drives: BRZ 2023
Location: Washington
Posts: 281
Thanks: 233
Thanked 104 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
I would not bet against the OEM header for power. But for midrange, losing the 1st cat and going 4-2-1 with long 2-1 tubes should gain you some midrange. But honestly $$$ might be better spent elsewhere!
Only reason I see to get one would be if someone makes a bigger pan specifically for it. Verus one looks compromised shaped to fit OEM headers.
ruturaj001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2024, 09:16 PM   #9
ruturaj001
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Drives: BRZ 2023
Location: Washington
Posts: 281
Thanks: 233
Thanked 104 Times in 78 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomyyyu View Post
Seems like you also have to also consider the oil pans that can fit.

SME pan fits the SME header

Formula Delta pan TBD what headers fit last I saw

Verus Pan seems like it would fit JDL UEL (but you do need to put a few taps in the runners to get it to fit, last they shared with the community).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That SME pan looks pretty interesting.
ruturaj001 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.