follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2017, 03:50 PM   #1163
Mrc@ptuning
Senior Member
 
Mrc@ptuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: S1000RR
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 441
Thanks: 246
Thanked 520 Times in 218 Posts
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by nos145 View Post
*whiny voice* any luck w that automatic setup?
i love my auto but I am having an existential crisis because no ptuning turbo for it Q.Q
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silent_Dan View Post
As an automatic owner also I wish to have a p-tuning turbo on my car also but I don't see it happening though .

Please reconsider making a kit for the auto owners.

We've had a handful of inquiries over the past few years for an automatic version. But due to the larger size of the A/T vs the M/T, It would require re-engineering a completely different overpipe, turbo placement, downpipe and all the other hotside components and brackets. At this time there's just not a real demand, as in 25+ kits, to justify the R&D on an A/T version.
Mrc@ptuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2017, 11:53 AM   #1164
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Going to dyno tonight on both 91/101 octane tunes. Can't wait to see what kind of power I'm putting down at 14.5 PSI (101) on the 2867!
__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rb6freak For This Useful Post:
JBezugs (04-15-2017), kanundrum (03-21-2017), Mrc@ptuning (03-21-2017)
Old 03-21-2017, 11:19 PM   #1165
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
274/217 at 12.7 PSI on Evasive Motorsports Mustang Dyno

__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to rb6freak For This Useful Post:
CxG (03-30-2017), Hicklinc (01-29-2018), Joe's86 (03-23-2017), kanundrum (03-22-2017), mkivsoopra (03-22-2017), Mrc@ptuning (03-22-2017)
Old 03-22-2017, 03:42 PM   #1166
Silent_Dan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Corinth, Mississippi
Posts: 107
Thanks: 92
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
So that is what it will take for you to consider making one?

I'm sure we can get that easy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrc@ptuning View Post
We've had a handful of inquiries over the past few years for an automatic version. But due to the larger size of the A/T vs the M/T, It would require re-engineering a completely different overpipe, turbo placement, downpipe and all the other hotside components and brackets. At this time there's just not a real demand, as in 25+ kits, to justify the R&D on an A/T version.
Silent_Dan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Silent_Dan For This Useful Post:
nos145 (03-27-2017)
Old 03-27-2017, 12:33 AM   #1167
nos145
Cognite
 
nos145's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Drives: 2013 Whiteout FRS
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 245
Thanks: 121
Thanked 57 Times in 52 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrc@ptuning View Post
We've had a handful of inquiries over the past few years for an automatic version. But due to the larger size of the A/T vs the M/T, It would require re-engineering a completely different overpipe, turbo placement, downpipe and all the other hotside components and brackets. At this time there's just not a real demand, as in 25+ kits, to justify the R&D on an A/T version.
I co-own a mechanical engineering company.
I would be willing to put an engineer on the project if you are interested in partnership. I am talking flow analysis and all the bells and whistles.
Send me a DM with contact info for further discussion please.
nos145 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 12:21 AM   #1168
Joe's86
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 99 eclipse RS
Location: dayton, Ohio
Posts: 24
Thanks: 12
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
was that dyno pull with 91 or 101?
and are you running the gt or the gtx 2867r?
Joe's86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 09:56 AM   #1169
BRZ_Willy
Member
 
BRZ_Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: 2016 WRB Subaru BRZ
Location: Pinellas, FL
Posts: 18
Thanks: 11
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
His build thread says Garrett GTX2867R. Not sure of fuel though.
BRZ_Willy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BRZ_Willy For This Useful Post:
Joe's86 (04-10-2017), rb6freak (04-08-2017)
Old 04-08-2017, 03:47 PM   #1170
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's86 View Post
was that dyno pull with 91 or 101?
and are you running the gt or the gtx 2867r?
That pull was with 101 octane in the tank, running about 1 and 2/3rds degrees more timing over my 91 octane tune. I could have run another couple PSI to squeeze more power which the 101 tune was setup for, but I only got 3 pulls total at Evasive so I didn't get to do all that I wanted.

GTX2867R with 7lbs waste gate spring and 70 % duty cycle on the boost solenoid on that dyno pull.
__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2017, 03:53 PM   #1171
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Here is the 91/101 tune and pull overlay. I instructed the tech to do lower boost on the 91, but according to the chart he did the higher boost setting. I don't know though, I think maybe they mixed up the 3 charts. It's possible, but hard to believe 1.66 degrees more timing added that much power. The 91 octane tune is set to about 9psi where as the 101 I can do upwards of 14 (was 12.7 in the pulls on the dyno).

__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rb6freak For This Useful Post:
Hicklinc (01-29-2018), Joe's86 (04-10-2017)
Old 04-13-2017, 04:55 PM   #1172
Joe's86
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: 99 eclipse RS
Location: dayton, Ohio
Posts: 24
Thanks: 12
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
are you still happy with the switch from the 3076 to 2867?
Joe's86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 06:47 PM   #1173
Xevuhtess7
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Why does it take all the way til 6400rpm to build peak boost?....
Xevuhtess7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2017, 08:39 PM   #1174
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe's86 View Post
are you still happy with the switch from the 3076 to 2867?
Yes, very. More so with all of the V2 upgrades and the fact that its easier for installation/maintenance with the smaller turbo.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xevuhtess7 View Post
Why does it take all the way til 6400rpm to build peak boost?....
My boost solenoid is very basic (AEM Tru Boost), at 1PSI its set to ramp up spool until 6PSI (my WasteGate configuration), and then maintains 70% duty cycle. My tuner said he could run circles around this setup if I plugged in the solenoid 5V/ground to the ECU so he could control it, but I already have my gauge cluster setup and I kind of like having the flexibility to adjust.

If I set the solenoid to a higher WG spring number or use stronger spring in my wastegate, I could achieve peak boost much sooner, but I like it this way. Also note this is a 4th gear pull on a dyno starting the pull at 3K.
__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rb6freak For This Useful Post:
Joe's86 (04-15-2017)
Old 06-06-2017, 11:21 AM   #1175
86Tony
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: 2015 AOZORA EDITION
Location: Markham, ON
Posts: 477
Thanks: 63
Thanked 122 Times in 81 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Which oil cooler will fit with this kit ? I currently have the jackson racing oil cooler will that still work?? Also do you need injectors and pump for 94 gas???
86Tony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2017, 12:51 PM   #1176
rb6freak
Senior Member
 
rb6freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 23 BRZ
Location: CA
Posts: 539
Thanks: 545
Thanked 686 Times in 299 Posts
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86Tony View Post
Which oil cooler will fit with this kit ? I currently have the jackson racing oil cooler will that still work?? Also do you need injectors and pump for 94 gas???
I'm not sure which off-the-shelf air oil cooler kit works with this kit. I'm using a Setrab series 9 15row sandwiched between the intercooler and AC condenser, but it is bolted to the bottom plastic tray with a home brewed bracket further securing it to the AC condenser. I believe the JR oil cooler bolts to the bottom of the crash beam right? I'm not entirely sure that would work. The intercooler bolts to the crash beam and hangs underneath it. You could relocate it to the same location I have here.

See my oil cooler here in front of the condenser.



Injectors are highly recommended. A friend of mine tuned with pump gas on stock injectors and was at about 85% duty cycle on the port injectors and the tuner didn't want to take it any further because of this. So he ended up getting new injectors. I'd recommend that too.

Pump not needed until you're going far beyond 350whp.
__________________
rb6freak is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
ptuning, turbo kit


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Innovate (Sprintex) Supercharger Owners Topic DarrenDriven Forced Induction 9139 12-29-2023 10:58 PM
AVO Turbo Kit Owners Topic Sportsguy83 Forced Induction 1935 02-20-2023 10:46 AM
Full Blown Turbo Kit Owners Topic King Tut Forced Induction 2637 12-27-2020 03:44 PM
FA20Club Turbo Kit Owners Topic pixel67 Forced Induction 1531 09-09-2014 12:36 PM
P&L Turbo Owners Topic Thread GTB/ZR-1 Forced Induction 4 09-01-2013 06:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.