follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-30-2015, 03:22 PM   #29
Scavanger
Avid searcher of things
 
Scavanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Drives: Scion Fr-s 10 series
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 326
Thanks: 131
Thanked 56 Times in 44 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
So there stage 2 kit comes with pretty much all of that so yeah lol
Scavanger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2015, 03:22 PM   #30
CSG Mike
 
CSG Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: S2000 CR
Location: Orange County
Posts: 14,531
Thanks: 8,920
Thanked 14,177 Times in 6,835 Posts
Mentioned: 966 Post(s)
Tagged: 14 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by LucidMomentum View Post
I know what I'm doing for Christmas this year...

Would a clutch replacement be needed for a 200k end goal as well? Or are the axles the only thing to be concerned about with the above setup and the same driving style as OP?
A clutch replacement will most likely be a replacement *wear and tear* item, not something that needs to be replaced because it's not holding.

For example, I recently replaced the clutch on my S2000 after 117k miles, but I actually had to replace it because my throwout bearing was worn out, not the clutch itself. Since the labor is virtually identical, I went ahead and replaced the clutch too. I had over 60% of the disk material left at the time of replacement; the car has had plenty of track miles put on it.
CSG Mike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSG Mike For This Useful Post:
LucidMomentum (01-30-2015)
Old 01-30-2015, 03:51 PM   #31
LucidMomentum
No Money, No Problems
 
LucidMomentum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2015 Scion FR-S (Halo White)
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 901
Thanks: 740
Thanked 678 Times in 354 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSG Mike View Post
A clutch replacement will most likely be a replacement *wear and tear* item, not something that needs to be replaced because it's not holding.

For example, I recently replaced the clutch on my S2000 after 117k miles, but I actually had to replace it because my throwout bearing was worn out, not the clutch itself. Since the labor is virtually identical, I went ahead and replaced the clutch too. I had over 60% of the disk material left at the time of replacement; the car has had plenty of track miles put on it.
Good to know. I think I've been asking you guys at CSG about FI from the moment I picked up my car. Now I just have to save and make it happen...
__________________
LucidMomentum is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LucidMomentum For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (01-30-2015)
Old 02-01-2015, 07:49 AM   #32
ecko04
Seems Legit
 
ecko04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Toyota
Location: Here & There
Posts: 855
Thanks: 187
Thanked 438 Times in 250 Posts
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scavanger View Post
For the power he is looking for just the motor awap will get him there so ge wouldnt have to go the fi route

I hope you're just trolling because that's the most ridiculous thing stated in this thread.

The FBM built motor in and of itself will not generate more power. It's not built for NA cars. It's built to withstand more boost than the factory motor. Without boost, you're actually not going to see a benefit from running it.

A high performance NA build will cost quite a bit more.
__________________
No build thread. I don't want to be reminded of how much money I spent.
[insert profound quote here]
ecko04 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ecko04 For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (02-01-2015)
Old 02-01-2015, 03:50 PM   #33
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ecko04 View Post
I hope you're just trolling because that's the most ridiculous thing stated in this thread.

The FBM built motor in and of itself will not generate more power. It's not built for NA cars. It's built to withstand more boost than the factory motor. Without boost, you're actually not going to see a benefit from running it.

A high performance NA build will cost quite a bit more.
He's a troll.
__________________
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sw20kosh For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (02-01-2015)
Old 02-01-2015, 09:35 PM   #34
autograph
Senior Member
 
autograph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 6MT Hot Lava
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 123
Thanks: 72
Thanked 41 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
@CSG Mike thank you so much for your reply. I am definitely leaning towards the JRSC; the only thing that concerns me is the oil cooler and cold temperatures. Stock FR-S takes pretty long to get to normal operating temperatures already; I believe I saw that JR advertises that its OC has a thermostatic oil adapter. I live in NJ and we see our fair share of cold weather.

I also wonder, as two of the folks who posted noted, if a PD / the sprintex blower would be better for daily driving with the power down low and the fact that my car spends 99% of its life below 4k.

@BRZZZZZZZZZZ -- thats a beautiful red brz you have there thanks for posting the vid!

@Boofneenee -- you sir have pretty much the best profile picture on this entire forum.

thank you everyone for your comments and feedback!
autograph is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to autograph For This Useful Post:
Boofneenee (02-01-2015), CSG Mike (02-02-2015)
Old 02-01-2015, 10:57 PM   #35
Scubaru
Senior Member
 
Scubaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '13 FR-S, '14 RAM 1500, '01 BMW330i
Location: Blacksburg
Posts: 117
Thanks: 67
Thanked 97 Times in 37 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
FWIW, I have less than 4k in my Sprintex kit. Paid $2875 for it on Cyber Monday, and was just a tick over a grand to have in installed and dyno tuned by Mach V.

For the other 5 grand you can just throw some supporting mods back at the car, such as the clutch and the axles for the reliability factor, or just pocket some of it!

I know your focus is on dyno numbers, but always keep in mind, it is just a tool used for tuning. What really matters is how the car performs on the street/track, and from what you've mentioned, a PD S/C would be my recommendation in your situation.

Here's the videos I posted with my car before/after install:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81630

Same exhaust setup, same stretch of road as well. Minus dyno and track time runs, it's about as close of a visual comparison as you can get.

Hope this helps!
Scubaru is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scubaru For This Useful Post:
Chad86 (02-09-2015)
Old 02-01-2015, 11:25 PM   #36
autograph
Senior Member
 
autograph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 6MT Hot Lava
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 123
Thanks: 72
Thanked 41 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scubaru View Post
FWIW, I have less than 4k in my Sprintex kit. Paid $2875 for it on Cyber Monday, and was just a tick over a grand to have in installed and dyno tuned by Mach V.

For the other 5 grand you can just throw some supporting mods back at the car, such as the clutch and the axles for the reliability factor, or just pocket some of it!

I know your focus is on dyno numbers, but always keep in mind, it is just a tool used for tuning. What really matters is how the car performs on the street/track, and from what you've mentioned, a PD S/C would be my recommendation in your situation.

Here's the videos I posted with my car before/after install:

http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=81630

Same exhaust setup, same stretch of road as well. Minus dyno and track time runs, it's about as close of a visual comparison as you can get.

Hope this helps!
@Scubaru you're absolutely correct about dyno numbers being a tool. Very nice vids; not entirely clear from your post on the forum, but you're non-intercooled in that video, right? 75mm pulley?
autograph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2015, 04:31 AM   #37
sw20kosh
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by autograph View Post
@CSG Mike thank you so much for your reply. I am definitely leaning towards the JRSC; the only thing that concerns me is the oil cooler and cold temperatures. Stock FR-S takes pretty long to get to normal operating temperatures already; I believe I saw that JR advertises that its OC has a thermostatic oil adapter. I live in NJ and we see our fair share of cold weather.

I also wonder, as two of the folks who posted noted, if a PD / the sprintex blower would be better for daily driving with the power down low and the fact that my car spends 99% of its life below 4k.

@BRZZZZZZZZZZ -- thats a beautiful red brz you have there thanks for posting the vid!

@Boofneenee -- you sir have pretty much the best profile picture on this entire forum.

thank you everyone for your comments and feedback!
Do not go Sprintex. You will be disappointed. IMHO. I had one, sold it and am now enjoying a kit that isn't maxed out at 230 whp on pump and that produces less and less power as you keep running it hard. I recommend you get a kit that doesn't have to work as hard to make the goals you want. Your goal is longevity right? You want more than 230-240 whp on pump? The JRSC is perfect.
__________________
sw20kosh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sw20kosh For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (02-02-2015)
Old 02-02-2015, 09:54 AM   #38
Scubaru
Senior Member
 
Scubaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: '13 FR-S, '14 RAM 1500, '01 BMW330i
Location: Blacksburg
Posts: 117
Thanks: 67
Thanked 97 Times in 37 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by autograph View Post
@Scubaru you're absolutely correct about dyno numbers being a tool. Very nice vids; not entirely clear from your post on the forum, but you're non-intercooled in that video, right? 75mm pulley?
Yessir. Installed right out of the box, no I/C

In following up with you on the parameters you need to meet with your purchase, the Sprintex easily meets 3/4 of them.

It's been a proven, reliable setup, the cost is well within your range (without "cheapening" out on anything), and the Sprintex makes good, instant power below 4k, which makes it a little more enjoyable as a DD in stop and go traffic.

Now as far as meeting your power goals, 260whp is going to be selective of impacting conditions and the dyno itself, which you yourself said can widely vary.

From my perspective, I agree with @sw20kosh that you will more than likely be disappointed with the numbers you will receive with the 210 kit.

Last edited by Scubaru; 02-02-2015 at 10:36 AM.
Scubaru is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Scubaru For This Useful Post:
CSG Mike (02-02-2015)
Old 02-06-2015, 08:21 PM   #39
autograph
Senior Member
 
autograph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Drives: 6MT Hot Lava
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 123
Thanks: 72
Thanked 41 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
thank you @sw20kosh and @Scubaru for your input. now I am conflicted :P its very difficult to decide between the two options. I think I'll have to make an effort to get seat time in cars that have the systems installed to really make up my mind
autograph is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to autograph For This Useful Post:
sw20kosh (02-06-2015)
Old 02-09-2015, 12:18 PM   #40
Chad86
DrivinginDreams...Cloud86
 
Chad86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: Toyota GT86
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 1,173
Thanks: 1,481
Thanked 266 Times in 178 Posts
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Lightbulb

I have almost made up my mind to go with the Sprintex 335 aiming for 300 whp, but have now also started looking at the Ptuning turbo kit. I am looking for reliability and low end torque for daily driving and do not want to blow my engine, obviously. Anyone know the pros and cons and different outcomes between going turbo vs supercharger? Now I am conflicted between the Ptuning turbo kit and the Sprintex 335 supercharger.

This video makes me question going with Sprintex. The Ptuning kit seems solid. Others have also mentioned the P&L turbo kit being better than Ptuning due to top mounted turbo. Input appreciated, thanks.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmqaz9wDbVM"]BRZ STI?- A TURBO BRZ Review - YouTube[/ame]
[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhVogbn_ZSQ"]P&L Motorsports - Stage 1 BRZ Turbo Kit - Track Testing - YouTube[/ame]

Last edited by Chad86; 02-09-2015 at 12:45 PM.
Chad86 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Needed opinions: Does debadging "Subaru" and "BRZ" cheapen the car? davidchoi Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 49 11-22-2014 10:17 PM
Opinions Needed on Greddy/Trust Spoiler Primeraman Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 4 11-22-2014 10:09 PM
Opinions David Southern California 9 06-13-2013 10:43 PM
Anyone go from a 06-11 Civic Si to an FR-S/BRZ? Opinions/ Knowledge needed! jbsali Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 2 01-15-2013 01:41 AM
I need your opinions WatchmaN Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 25 12-12-2012 12:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.