Most power Normally Aspirated?

[strat61caster]

Shitshows like this are how stereotypes are created.

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

You can probably chime in, Just saw his supposed dyno results on the mustang dyno.


his stated weight is:4250
his wcf is a factor of 0.6 (normal correction is .9-1.1 is it not?)


I'm no dyno expert but would that invalidate the numbers to say the least

AS far as a WCF


The formula I use for Mustang to Dynojet is HP X 1.17
so 221X1.17=253 dynojet rwhp


again that's factoring using correct inputs such as weight weather and so on


I can't speak for how other tuners get their comparison numbers or what formula they use. I'm sure every tuner has their own way

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by FRS Justin

Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 2900 pounds and HP of 221 is 13.74 seconds and MPH of 98.37 MPH.


Your ET / MPH computed from your vehicle weight of 4250 pounds and HP of 221 is 15.60 seconds and MPH of 86.60 MPH.


SO if you tell the dyno you weigh x amount it will figure how much power is needed to move x amount of weight over x amount of time to x amount of speed.


So it would take more power to move 4000lbs than 2900lbs at a given speed over a given length.


Lots of factors come into play here but this is the simple version

pretty much what I had gathered (in a more simplistic manner lol more weight inputted in dyno = less hp output read).


Am I correct in assuming that a lower wcf (it is .6 in this case) would tend to balloon the hp figure and that a higher wcf(say 1.4) would decrease the hypothetical results? (as in a 250hp car dyno'd at .6wcf would read as higher hp than 250 while a run with a high wcf, say 1.4, would lower the hp reading) In other words, what is the correlation between inputted wcf and posted hp result (higher wcf= lower hp or higher wcf = higher hp)?

[riboyster]

Hah 250hp this is getting out of hand

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by riboyster

Hah 250hp this is getting out of hand

If you would kindly read, those are hypothetical numbers just to make sure I grasp the concept properly.


P.S I have more than 250whp in my brz but it's FI not NA

[jawn]

I can't wait for @celek to finish his car.

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

pretty much what I had gathered (in a more simplistic manner lol more weight inputted in dyno = less hp output read).


Am I correct in assuming that a lower wcf (it is .6 in this case) would tend to balloon the hp figure and that a higher wcf(say 1.4) would decrease the hypothetical results? (as in a 250hp car dyno'd at .6wcf would read as higher hp than 250 while a run with a high wcf, say 1.4, would lower the hp reading) In other words, what is the correlation between inputted wcf and posted hp result (higher wcf= lower hp or higher wcf = higher hp)?

The CF of .6 is larger than the .17 CF I use. I just make it 1.17 so I don't have to add the original hp number to it. the 1. is = to the hp w/o correction.


SO say I dyno 180 then its 180X1.17=210.6hp


So if someone uses the CF of .6 it would be 180X1.60=288hp


SAME AS 180X.17=30.6 + 180= 210.6


OR 180X.6=108+180=288

[fumanchu1]

Originally Posted by FRS Justin

The CF of .6 is larger than the .17 CF I use. I just make it 1.17 so I don't have to add the original hp number to it. the 1. is = to the hp w/o correction.


SO say I dyno 180 then its 180X1.17=210.6hp


So if someone uses the CF of .6 it would be 180X1.60=288hp


SAME AS 180X.17=30.6 + 180= 210.6


OR 180X.6=108+180=288

Cool that was what i suspected so he manipulated the wcf and the weight to achieve the numbers he claimed. Thanks for the clarification bud

Sent from my SGH-M919V using Tapatalk

[[YOYO]]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

Cool that was what i suspected so he manipulated the wcf and the weight to achieve the numbers he claimed. Thanks for the clarification bud

Sent from my SGH-M919V using Tapatalk

Why do people even bother Just go get the damn parts that actually make the car do what you claim it does, and then go drive and enjoy it. Instead we get a puppet show. I suppose big threads like these on forums are what these people get off on.

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by [YOYO]

Why do people even bother Just go get the damn parts that actually make the car do what you claim it does, and then go drive and enjoy it. Instead we get a puppet show. I suppose big threads like these on forums are what these people get off on.

UMMMM you have posted here as well.
We like to debate. Is that so wrong? Don't like the "puppet show" don't buy a ticket.


Nobody dragged you in here.


I hope.


They didn't did they?


Are those forum secret police forcing people on again?


Click once if you are not here of your own free will.


We will send help.


They will be coming in an NA FRS so it may take a while.

[FyeaFRS]

tl;dr

Waiting for "mike cena" to appear..

[FRS Justin]

Originally Posted by fumanchu1

Cool that was what i suspected so he manipulated the wcf and the weight to achieve the numbers he claimed. Thanks for the clarification bud

Sent from my SGH-M919V using Tapatalk

I'm just saying how dynos read lol I'm not calling anyone out...But the 1000 dollar pot race is still on if anyone is interested
I would have to build another n/a car tho but that won't take long

[KR-S]

Originally Posted by FyeaFRS

tl;dr

Waiting for "mike cena" to appear..

Waiting for someone to awkwardly remix this.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k1xY7v8dDQ"]John Cena Intro (for MLG) - YouTube[/ame]

[raven1231]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

UMMMM you have posted here as well.
We like to debate. Is that so wrong? Don't like the "puppet show" don't buy a ticket.


Nobody dragged you in here.


I hope.


They didn't did they?


Are those forum secret police forcing people on again?


Click once if you are not here of your own free will.


We will send help.


They will be coming in an NA FRS so it may take a while.

Best part of this thread