follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2021, 12:44 PM   #57
Transport3r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Drives: -
Location: US
Posts: 288
Thanks: 203
Thanked 294 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
BRZ/86 stopping distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
No. Mu is shorthand for frictional coefficient. Higher "mu" simply lowers the pedal force required to achieve the same reactive torque required to counteract the wheel torque, which is limited by tire grip - also with its own mu.

I'm not a tribology expert but I don't remember seeing a speed component affecting dynamic coefficient of friction in any of my related studies.

It changes with velocity, but the curve is highly dependent on the material combination.

Rubber on asphalt:

Transport3r is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Transport3r For This Useful Post:
Ultramaroon (04-22-2021)
Old 04-22-2021, 01:03 PM   #58
Ultramaroon
義理チョコ
 
Ultramaroon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: a 13 e8h frs
Location: vantucky, wa
Posts: 31,864
Thanks: 52,118
Thanked 36,512 Times in 18,917 Posts
Mentioned: 1106 Post(s)
Tagged: 9 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transport3r View Post
It changes with velocity, but the curve is highly dependent on the material combination.
Sure. In this context especially, temperature has a huge effect, but let's be clear. All other conditions being equal, speed is negligible.

I need more info to interpret that graph. Not discounting it, just... for instance, if it's expressing speed logarithmically, while I see your point, I think it also supports my argument for neglecting it.
__________________

Last edited by Ultramaroon; 04-22-2021 at 01:20 PM.
Ultramaroon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 02:12 PM   #59
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transport3r View Post
It changes with velocity, but the curve is highly dependent on the material combination.

Rubber on asphalt:

What in the Christ? In the context of the grip between a car's tire and the road, static or sliding, this makes zero sense. Does the scale really go from 0.000000000001 m/s up to 10,000 m/s?!

In the real world, with no downforce, tire grip on the road (effective coefficient of friction) isn't a strong function of speed.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 02:14 PM   #60
Stonehorsw
Senior Member
 
Stonehorsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Drives: 18 Brz (Sold) / 22 BRZ
Location: Michigan
Posts: 644
Thanks: 1,017
Thanked 439 Times in 256 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultramaroon View Post
No. Mu is shorthand for frictional coefficient. Higher "mu" simply lowers the pedal force required to achieve the same reactive torque required to counteract the wheel torque, which is limited by tire grip - also with its own mu.

I'm not a tribology expert but I don't remember seeing a speed component affecting dynamic coefficient of friction in any of my related studies.
Friction coefficient is dependent of speed, temperature and pressure. Good way to see that is the standard AK Master testing for brakes.
Stonehorsw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2021, 04:27 PM   #61
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,364
Thanks: 13,731
Thanked 9,474 Times in 4,995 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to strat61caster For This Useful Post:
Capt Spaulding (04-22-2021)
Old 04-22-2021, 05:06 PM   #62
Transport3r
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Drives: -
Location: US
Posts: 288
Thanks: 203
Thanked 294 Times in 147 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
What in the Christ? In the context of the grip between a car's tire and the road, static or sliding, this makes zero sense. Does the scale really go from 0.000000000001 m/s up to 10,000 m/s?!

In the real world, with no downforce, tire grip on the road (effective coefficient of friction) isn't a strong function of speed.

Fair, the actual part of the curve that you can bookend in a car is probably a shallow slope that’s almost a straight line, but grip does change with wheelspin speed, that’s why you can adjust your lateral friction force (and thus slip angle) with the throttle when sliding.
Transport3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2021, 06:34 AM   #63
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transport3r View Post
Fair, the actual part of the curve that you can bookend in a car is probably a shallow slope that’s almost a straight line, but grip does change with wheelspin speed, that’s why you can adjust your lateral friction force (and thus slip angle) with the throttle when sliding.
I'm gonna say that curve is for something else, other than a realistic model of effective coefficient of friction between a car tire and asphalt. I mean, effective friction coefficient doesn't go from ~1 at "normal" speeds down to less than 0.2 stopped. Also, for a simplified model of car tire on asphalt, we'd wanna see mu-static and mu-dynamic(sliding). Maybe for a dragstrip launchpad mu-adh(esive). But mu-vis? Viscous? Like we're plowing through a sea of hot asphalt?!

That plot has zero to do with modeling tire grip!

AS far as lateral vs longitudinal friction force, that would be different for every tire. Some tires maintain a surprising amount of lateral grip while spinning, some lose any semblance of lateral grip when they start to slip/spin. Very very different characteristics between tires there, you wouldn't be able to have a generic curve modeling "tire rubber" on "asphalt".

In the context of this thread, straightline braking grip between tire and tarmac, on a car with no downforce, is not going to be a strong function of vehicle speed.

Last edited by ZDan; 04-23-2021 at 06:54 AM.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stopping the window half way BirdTRD Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 18 11-07-2017 04:09 PM
Klunks when stopping NOHOME Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 8 06-26-2017 11:44 AM
FR-S - AT nearly stalls when stopping WryGuy Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 12 05-27-2016 03:04 PM
Distance? Nonfacter1 Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 3 01-13-2015 10:17 AM
Distance Drive for New Car Kundiethala Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 25 08-14-2012 10:56 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.