follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


View Poll Results: What name should Toyota use for the production Toyota FT-1?
Supra gets my vote! 367 74.59%
I don't know, but its time for a new name. 125 25.41%
Voters: 492. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2016, 02:40 PM   #1373
RRnold
2 wheel member
 
RRnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
As a MKIV Supra owner, I've been following the FT-1 thread on Supraforums and even the SupraMKV forum. A good majority of Supra owners, esp the older forum members are not as excited with the so called Supra mule.

I've followed the FT86 concept back in 07 till the joint partnership announcement of Toyota and Subaru. After that, the GT86 no longer met my expectations. I'm seeing the similar trend with this Toyota and BMW joint partnership.
__________________
RRnold is offline  
Old 12-09-2016, 02:00 PM   #1374
MurderousPandas
Senior Member
 
MurderousPandas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Drives: 2013 Scion FRS
Location: Key Largo
Posts: 331
Thanks: 20
Thanked 118 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
As a MKIV Supra owner, I've been following the FT-1 thread on Supraforums and even the SupraMKV forum. A good majority of Supra owners, esp the older forum members are not as excited with the so called Supra mule.

I've followed the FT86 concept back in 07 till the joint partnership announcement of Toyota and Subaru. After that, the GT86 no longer met my expectations. I'm seeing the similar trend with this Toyota and BMW joint partnership.
I think BMW and Toyota can pull it off. Toyota seems to be good at making long, sleek coupes still as demonstrated by the twins. And BMW is known for modern I6's. It won't be the same, but i'm sure fun is still a factor in production, how can you make a Supra and forget to add the fun?

"Chasing speed with patience"
MurderousPandas is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MurderousPandas For This Useful Post:
gymratter (12-16-2016), RRnold (12-19-2016)
Old 12-13-2016, 10:30 PM   #1375
vh_supra26
Site Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,793
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,181 Times in 964 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)

Last edited by vh_supra26; 12-15-2016 at 03:58 PM.
vh_supra26 is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vh_supra26 For This Useful Post:
gymratter (12-13-2016), Hawk77FT (12-13-2016), slow86 (12-14-2016)
Old 12-14-2016, 11:05 PM   #1376
slow86
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Poopra 4
Location: Dumpster
Posts: 55
Thanks: 50
Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I really do feel like Toyota is going to f*ck this up...I really do
slow86 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to slow86 For This Useful Post:
RRnold (12-19-2016)
Old 12-16-2016, 01:06 PM   #1377
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
As a MKIV Supra owner, I've been following the FT-1 thread on Supraforums and even the SupraMKV forum. A good majority of Supra owners, esp the older forum members are not as excited with the so called Supra mule.

I've followed the FT86 concept back in 07 till the joint partnership announcement of Toyota and Subaru. After that, the GT86 no longer met my expectations. I'm seeing the similar trend with this Toyota and BMW joint partnership.
its a disguised prototype. a quick reminder of what the almighty MK4 looked liked while testing.

gymratter is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to gymratter For This Useful Post:
RRnold (12-19-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 07:29 PM   #1378
RRnold
2 wheel member
 
RRnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurderousPandas View Post
I think BMW and Toyota can pull it off. Toyota seems to be good at making long, sleek coupes still as demonstrated by the twins. And BMW is known for modern I6's. It won't be the same, but i'm sure fun is still a factor in production, how can you make a Supra and forget to add the fun?

"Chasing speed with patience"
Do you think the twins are long and sleek? IMO, I don't think they are at all but true Toyota can still design cars. It's when they cut corners with joint partnerships is where they start to lose their essence.

Honestly, the LC-500 is what the Supra MKV should resemble. Just like how the SC300/400 was released then the Supra in the 90's, it would only make sense for history to repeat itself with the LC and then Supra MKV with very distinctive similarities.



Quote:
Originally Posted by gymratter View Post
its a disguised prototype. a quick reminder of what the almighty MK4 looked liked while testing.

You can still see the MKIV body though. At least it spawned from the early/ugly Supra designs.

It did take a while before Toyota came up with the legendary design.


__________________
RRnold is offline  
Old 12-19-2016, 09:48 PM   #1379
slow86
Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Drives: Poopra 4
Location: Dumpster
Posts: 55
Thanks: 50
Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
Do you think the twins are long and sleek?
The twins are about the size as the Celica - short and bubbly. When I think of long and sleek, I think of the Supra or its twin, the SC300/400.
slow86 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to slow86 For This Useful Post:
RRnold (12-20-2016)
Old 12-20-2016, 01:06 PM   #1380
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
You can still see the MKIV body though. At least it spawned from the early/ugly Supra designs.
the same can be said about prototype; you can start to clearly see the FT1 influence taking shape.



Quote:
Originally Posted by slow86 View Post
The twins are about the size as the Celica - short and bubbly. When I think of long and sleek, I think of the Supra or its cousin, the SC300/400.
gymratter is offline  
Old 12-20-2016, 02:37 PM   #1381
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow86 View Post
The twins are about the size as the Celica - short and bubbly. When I think of long and sleek, I think of the Supra or its twin, the SC300/400.
Not when seen side by side they aren't!
Attached Images
 
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline  
Old 12-20-2016, 02:39 PM   #1382
RRnold
2 wheel member
 
RRnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurderousPandas View Post
I think BMW and Toyota can pull it off. Toyota seems to be good at making long, sleek coupes still as demonstrated by the twins.
Quote:
Originally Posted by slow86 View Post
The twins are about the size as the Celica - short and bubbly. When I think of long and sleek, I think of the Supra or its twin, the SC300/400.
Exactly, I don't think the twins are long and sleek at all. The twins are more Celica size.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gymratter View Post
the same can be said about prototype; you can start to clearly see the FT1 influence taking shape.








Even though it has similar styling as the FT-1, it still looks tame. With full BMW interior, I'm still not fully convinced it's the Supra MKV.

The LC was dubbed "heavily camouflaged" too yet you can still see it's True Toyota muscle...wolf in sheep's clothing.

__________________
RRnold is offline  
Old 12-20-2016, 06:25 PM   #1383
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post
Exactly, I don't think the twins are long and sleek at all. The twins are more Celica size.

Even though it has similar styling as the FT-1, it still looks tame. With full BMW interior, I'm still not fully convinced it's the Supra MKV.

The LC was dubbed "heavily camouflaged" too yet you can still see it's True Toyota muscle...wolf in sheep's clothing.


it isn't uncommon for prototypes to use parts from the part bin while testing.

on the LC prototype there are still a lot of details being hidden. i'll reserve judgement on the new Supra until they show the real thing.

the twins aren't that much smaller than the MK4. even supraforum's moderator KenHenderson agreed with this statement.

Quote:
I'm with this guy. Besides, the MKIV and FR-S are closer in size than it may appear:


Last edited by gymratter; 12-20-2016 at 09:37 PM.
gymratter is offline  
Old 12-21-2016, 12:24 PM   #1384
RRnold
2 wheel member
 
RRnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gymratter View Post


it isn't uncommon for prototypes to use parts from the part bin while testing.

on the LC prototype there are still a lot of details being hidden. i'll reserve judgement on the new Supra until they show the real thing.

the twins aren't that much smaller than the MK4. even supraforum's moderator KenHenderson agreed with this statement.


I did see Ken's post on SF but with a close height, there is a significant length difference.

I do agree that they share parts but this late in the game, a full BMW interior not only shows who has more control of the project but can also mean, this could not be the Supra.

I doubt Toyota would allow that on such a legendary halo car and they would have been doing backflips on the car already. They don't fully disguise their prize like the Germans do. I too am waiting on the official announcement from Toyota.


__________________
RRnold is offline  
Old 12-21-2016, 02:08 PM   #1385
gymratter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,395
Thanks: 1,971
Thanked 1,825 Times in 952 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RRnold View Post


I did see Ken's post on SF but with a close height, there is a significant length difference.

I do agree that they share parts but this late in the game, a full BMW interior not only shows who has more control of the project but can also mean, this could not be the Supra.

I doubt Toyota would allow that on such a legendary halo car and they would have been doing backflips on the car already. They don't fully disguise their prize like the Germans do. I too am waiting on the official announcement from Toyota.
sorry but that comparison photo isn't actuate. there is only 10.9 inches between the two. the 86 also has a longer wheel wheelbase than the MK4

Supra MK4
Wheelbase: 100.4 in
Length: 177.8 in

86
Wheelbase: 101.2 in
Length: 166.9 in

i know a lot of people are saying its the "Z5 coupe". but it doesnt make sense for BMW to put a penis nose on their prototype. it also doesn't make sense for the coupe to have different lines than the roadster. the only official announcement we have is the BMW/Toyota press release where they state that they are working on a joint midsize sports car.
gymratter is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gymratter For This Useful Post:
funwheeldrive (12-21-2016), RRnold (12-21-2016)
Old 12-21-2016, 03:09 PM   #1386
RRnold
2 wheel member
 
RRnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: JZA80, 997.1, Taco
Location: SoCal->NorCal
Posts: 4,330
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 938 Times in 480 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gymratter View Post
sorry but that comparison photo isn't actuate. there is only 10.9 inches between the two. the 86 also has a longer wheel wheelbase than the MK4

Supra MK4
Wheelbase: 100.4 in
Length: 177.8 in

86
Wheelbase: 101.2 in
Length: 166.9 in

i know a lot of people are saying its the "Z5 coupe". but it doesnt make sense for BMW to put a penis nose on their prototype. it also doesn't make sense for the coupe to have different lines than the roadster. the only official announcement we have is the BMW/Toyota press release where they state that they are working on a joint midsize sports car.
Only 10.9", that's a lot don't you think?

Penis nose

You know how the German's do it.

__________________
RRnold is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Tags
bmwforsuckers, boring-zzzzzzzzzzzzz, brz, celica supra confirmed, frs, ft-1, hatch-y +1, morethanucanaffordpal, nomanualnogo, supra, toyota, twins, watstheretailon1ofthose


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toyota FR-S : Official Name for the FT-86 Concept? Dark Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 155 08-04-2010 11:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.