follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing

Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-15-2012, 09:21 PM   #1
jeebus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT (on order)
Location: San Diego
Posts: 904
Thanks: 114
Thanked 471 Times in 208 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Another crash bolts alignment thread

Installed the OEM crash bolts last week for autox. Loved the added camber so I got aligned today. My toe really wasn't that bad after the crash bolts, it was within spec. But I adjusted everything anyway.

Here's where I ended up:

Front camber: -1 left, -1 right
Caster: 5.5 left, 5.5 right
Toe: 1/32" out left, 1/32" out right

Rear camber: -1.4 left, -1.6 right
Rear toe: 1/8" in left, 1/8" in right

EDIT: UPDATE 9/19...realized rear toe was too aggressive. Had it changed to between 1/16" and 1/32" in, per side.
__________________

Last edited by jeebus; 09-19-2012 at 08:31 PM.
jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 09:24 PM   #2
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Looks good thats about where i want to be maybe a touch more negative up front. What are you lowered on?
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2012, 09:35 PM   #3
jeebus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT (on order)
Location: San Diego
Posts: 904
Thanks: 114
Thanked 471 Times in 208 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeBoxer View Post
Looks good thats about where i want to be maybe a touch more negative up front. What are you lowered on?
stock suspension.
__________________
jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 06:19 PM   #4
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
How did much negative camber in the rear did you have stock?
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 06:51 PM   #5
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It's not adjustable so that is what he had stock, unless he loosened parts up tried to move things around but that's kind of a PITA.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 07:03 PM   #6
ft86Fan
Senior Member
 
ft86Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: FR-S, Exige S, Miata
Location: Basking Ridge NJ
Posts: 798
Thanks: 327
Thanked 131 Times in 80 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
OP, just curious whether it would be better to keep front toe at zero (instead of toe out) and lessen the rear toe in instead? Also, were you not able to get more front camber with the crash bolts?
__________________
'13 Scion FR-S (Whiteout)
'07 Lotus Exige S (Aspen White) Touring, Traction, Starshield
'95 Miata (Montego Blue)
ft86Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 07:03 PM   #7
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwx View Post
It's not adjustable so that is what he had stock, unless he loosened parts up tried to move things around but that's kind of a PITA.
Yeah that is why i asked i didn't know we had -1.5 in the rear already.
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2012, 07:59 PM   #8
jeebus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2015 Mustang GT (on order)
Location: San Diego
Posts: 904
Thanks: 114
Thanked 471 Times in 208 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwx View Post
It's not adjustable so that is what he had stock, unless he loosened parts up tried to move things around but that's kind of a PITA.
Correct. I didn't alter the stock rear camber at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ft86Fan View Post
OP, just curious whether it would be better to keep front toe at zero (instead of toe out) and lessen the rear toe in instead? Also, were you not able to get more front camber with the crash bolts?
Well, there's a lot of possible routes one could go. I considered zero toe up front. But I like a pinch of toe out for that initial turn in response. 1/32" is very little (.03"), so I'm not overly concerned that it will make the car darty or wear the tires too fast. As for the rear...1/8" in (.125) is within spec, and I like the straight line stability it gives. I had absolutely NO trouble hanging the tail out at my last AutoX, so I'm not worried about it.

Originally, I wasn't planning on changing the rear toe at all because the crash bolts wouldn't affect the back. But after getting it on the rack, it was apparent that the factory alignment was pretty sloppy, so I figured I'd get it perfect.

And no, I was not able to get more that -1 camber with the crash bolts. It seems some people have managed to eek out a little bit more, but I'm fine with it.
__________________
jeebus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jeebus For This Useful Post:
ft86Fan (09-17-2012)
Old 09-17-2012, 02:08 PM   #9
Element Tuning
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Hydra EMS Powered FRS Raven Black
Location: Maryland
Posts: 839
Thanks: 54
Thanked 1,021 Times in 365 Posts
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeebus View Post
Correct. I didn't alter the stock rear camber at all.



Well, there's a lot of possible routes one could go. I considered zero toe up front. But I like a pinch of toe out for that initial turn in response. 1/32" is very little (.03"), so I'm not overly concerned that it will make the car darty or wear the tires too fast. As for the rear...1/8" in (.125) is within spec, and I like the straight line stability it gives. I had absolutely NO trouble hanging the tail out at my last AutoX, so I'm not worried about it.

Originally, I wasn't planning on changing the rear toe at all because the crash bolts wouldn't affect the back. But after getting it on the rack, it was apparent that the factory alignment was pretty sloppy, so I figured I'd get it perfect.

And no, I was not able to get more that -1 camber with the crash bolts. It seems some people have managed to eek out a little bit more, but I'm fine with it.
I'm running a lot more toe out up front and it feels good. I do have camber plates so I'm able to pull that toe back to zero when not racing. So the nice benefit with camber plates is that as you push for maximum negative camber for racing you can set your toe out to where you like and then as you pull back closer to an aggressive street alignment you can zero out your toe.

I was shocked at how much toe in the rear had OEM. So far though I have not been compelled to take any out based on how the car feels on the race track. I would think rear tire wear will be really bad for anyone going with a staggered fitment as they won't be able to rotate the tires.
Element Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 09:38 AM   #10
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,891 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
IMO that's way too much rear toe. In my experience with the S2000, more toe is good for nothing, and bad for everything (handling linearity, responsiveness, tire wear, fuel economy). I never found big rear toe to give increased stability over *reasonable* rear toe (~0.2 - 0.3 degrees total), and at the high/excessive end, it can DEcrease stability over bumps/undulations and in traction-challenged conditions.

You have 1/4" total rear toe or 0.57 degrees total. On the AP1, this is enough to give spooky/nonlinear handling behavior, impair turn-in response, and cut tire life literally in HALF.

The conventional wisdom is that big rear toe is more "stable", but in my experience it can be a lot less linear and confidence-inspiring, again, particularly over bumps/undulations and differential traction conditions between the rear tires (frequently happens in rain).
And of course it kills tires.

Waste of rear tire traction and life to have them continually scrubbing against each other at all times!
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:08 AM   #11
ABQautoxer
Senior Member
 
ABQautoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2021 Supra / 2022 Tundra
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 659
Thanks: 60
Thanked 197 Times in 141 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I would dial out some of that rear toe, especially with that little camber in the front. Only time I ran that much rear toe-in was for the Z06 so I could put down power earlier in a turn. Also, I wonder why you couldn't more negative camber, that's by far the lowest I have seen with crash bolts.
__________________
TomR
ABQautoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:16 AM   #12
gmookher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
is the 'OE crash bolt' basically another lower bolt you just put thru the top hole? its not lobed like the whiteline right>?
gmookher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:18 AM   #13
xwd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It is. It's identical to the lower bolt, you just push as hard as you can and tighten things down.
xwd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2012, 10:41 AM   #14
ABQautoxer
Senior Member
 
ABQautoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2021 Supra / 2022 Tundra
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 659
Thanks: 60
Thanked 197 Times in 141 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I didn't push hard, I simple pulled out on the bottom of the rotor and in at the top and tightened it down and got -1.6 on both sides.
__________________
TomR
ABQautoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crash bolts alignment change ABQautoxer Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting 39 03-24-2014 05:45 PM
The CRASH n BUMP thread!! MattQ-WP Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 11 11-13-2012 07:05 PM
seat bolts? zooki Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 3 08-29-2012 06:00 PM
where to get alignment? FML Hawaii 2 08-08-2012 01:36 AM
replace front crash bolts to add camber? Matt Andrews Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 15 06-15-2012 10:05 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.