follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 2nd Gens: GR86 and BRZ > GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86)

GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) General topics for the GR86 second-gen 86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-08-2021, 03:18 PM   #15
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,376
Thanked 3,890 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSunrise View Post
I think that picture is a great example of what I’m talking about. You may be right about certain features (headlight height or fender arch height) being lower, but even looking at that picture, the 1st gen just looks lower/wider. That’s why I think it might be the design differences rather than any physical differences, or even camera angles/lenses.
Huh, it doesn't look lower to me...

Here are a couple of front 3/4 shots of each. To me, the 2nd gen looks lower at the front and rear fender peaks, lower at the nose, wheel openings are lower over the tires, it just looks LOWER. In fact I would bet that both the 0.4" lower overall height and the claimed lower c.g. are both due to just lowering the car 0.4" on it suspension.



ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2021, 03:59 PM   #16
DarkSunrise
Senior Member
 
DarkSunrise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ (Previously 13 FR-S)
Location: USA
Posts: 5,794
Thanks: 2,164
Thanked 4,242 Times in 2,220 Posts
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Huh, it doesn't look lower to me...

Here are a couple of front 3/4 shots of each. To me, the 2nd gen looks lower at the front and rear fender peaks, lower at the nose, wheel openings are lower over the tires, it just looks LOWER. In fact I would bet that both the 0.4" lower overall height and the claimed lower c.g. are both due to just lowering the car 0.4" on it suspension.
Yeah I also don’t see it as much on the 3/4 shots. The straight on front and rear shots are probably the clearest examples. I’m hoping IRL the second gen will have a nice low sporty look to it. I like the mechanical changes to the car otherwise. Maybe I’ll wait for the gen 2 refresh to see what changes that brings to the exterior.
__________________
"Never run out of real estate, traction, and ideas at the same time."

2022 BRZ Build
2013 FR-S Build
DarkSunrise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2021, 04:51 PM   #17
Stonehorsw
Senior Member
 
Stonehorsw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Drives: 18 Brz (Sold) / 22 BRZ
Location: Michigan
Posts: 644
Thanks: 1,017
Thanked 439 Times in 256 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
Huh, it doesn't look lower to me...

Here are a couple of front 3/4 shots of each. To me, the 2nd gen looks lower at the front and rear fender peaks, lower at the nose, wheel openings are lower over the tires, it just looks LOWER. In fact I would bet that both the 0.4" lower overall height and the claimed lower c.g. are both due to just lowering the car 0.4" on it suspension.




I would like a little more differentiation on the headlights and taillights. I liked the remainder of the vehicle.
Stonehorsw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2021, 08:25 PM   #18
Ernest72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Drives: 16 Silver BRZ, 04 Silver WRX wagon
Location: Rockland county, NY
Posts: 1,410
Thanks: 181
Thanked 768 Times in 439 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Other than the vent, I prefer Gen1 with a taillight change.
Ernest72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2021, 07:00 AM   #19
chipmunk
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: _
Location: _
Posts: 440
Thanks: 50
Thanked 178 Times in 104 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
It would have been helpful if the comparisons were of actual blueprints/drawings. Photographs depend on A LOT of things - perspective, distance from the camera, focal points, etc. It can only be a qualitative assessment.

Wasted a click
chipmunk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chipmunk For This Useful Post:
OwlDance (07-10-2021)
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
comparison of my GTR and 458 humdizzle Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 19 07-19-2016 05:36 PM
Motor1 Drives The 2017 Subaru BRZ! Guff BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 17 07-08-2016 11:50 PM
Comparison with 944 taosracer FR-S / BRZ vs.... 51 06-10-2016 04:55 PM
BRZ vs FRS HU comparison kelee Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 4 05-08-2014 09:59 PM
Help with LED SMD comparison ang31ito Cosmetic Modification (Interior/Exterior/Lighting) 17 03-13-2014 05:44 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.