follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > FT86CLUB Shared Forum > FR-S / BRZ vs....

FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING]


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-27-2014, 12:21 AM   #155
Jdogg88
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Drives: Sapphire Blue ‘23
Location: Music City, Tn
Posts: 101
Thanks: 90
Thanked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
My boss's son just picked up a CBS limited last night. It's got a real menacing look to it with the boomerang headlights and front end in person. The interior is real nice and very comfortable, and the heads up display is pretty sweet. Even the back seats are nice. The only thing I didn't like was how quiet it was when he pulled away. Can't wait till it's broken in and get to drive it!
Jdogg88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2014, 02:02 PM   #156
Deep Six
Senior Member
 
Deep Six's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FRS / 2013 427 Vert
Location: Orlando
Posts: 611
Thanks: 212
Thanked 328 Times in 197 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83 View Post
Yeah, and that definitely helped it get pretty decent highway mpg too. Which brings me to my question...

AMG's 6.2-liter was just a hair less torquey given the slight displacement deficit but even in its M156 tunes (rather than the M159 tune in the SLS AMG, which isn't really a fair comparison), it still matched or beat its hp and torque numbers in most applications above the standard C63. How come its highway mpg was so poor in comparison? I'd assume that the car had enough bottom torque to keep the car moving at highway speeds without needing too many revs (like the LS7 or even the LS3, which was also a 6.2), yet its gearing wasn't really as tall as it could've been, especially with a seven-speed transmission.
Weight gearing and drag coefficient . My C63 got 21 mpg steady highway cruising with 475 wheel horsepower. My 427 gets 25 with the top down.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
2013 FR-S Asphalt BC Coils/Rev Works UEL header/HKS Front Pipe/Racing Brake BBK/Shorai LW Battery/ACT 6 Puck Clutch/FBM Radiator & Oil Pan/JR Oil Cooler/Jackson Racing High Boost C30/Rev Works Built Motor
2016 Audi TTS APR Tuned
Deep Six is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 11:54 AM   #157
WolfpackS2k
Senior Member
 
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Drives: '12 C63 P31, '23 GRC
Location: NC
Posts: 3,200
Thanks: 2,935
Thanked 2,072 Times in 1,185 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Do the C63's with the 7sp transmission get better gas mileage?
__________________
Current: 2023 GRC Circuit Edition, 2012 C63 AMG P31
Past: (2) 2000 MR2 Spyder, 2017 GTI Sport, 2006 Porsche Cayman S, Supercharged 2013 BRZ-L, 2007 Honda S2000, 1992 Integra GS-R
WolfpackS2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 12:32 PM   #158
johnnyfast11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: none yet
Location: Houston
Posts: 187
Thanks: 42
Thanked 67 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
be prepared to see 16-22mpg max. if this STI gets 30+mpg and 28mpg mixed. i'd consider.


or i'd just get a f80 m3 instead that gets 32mpg with 450hp.



you will get really sick of 16mpg really really quick. trust me.
johnnyfast11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 12:37 PM   #159
DeeezNuuuts83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2006 Evo IX SE
Location: Southern California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 115
Thanked 254 Times in 170 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k View Post
Do the C63's with the 7sp transmission get better gas mileage?
Better than what?

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyfast11 View Post
if this STI gets 30+mpg and 28mpg mixed. i'd consider.
Unfortunately, it won't get anything near that, when it has pretty much the same powertrain as before, one that managed numbers well below that.
DeeezNuuuts83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 01:36 PM   #160
chrisl
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2006 Cayman S, 2007 Outback 2.5i
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,116
Thanks: 116
Thanked 455 Times in 303 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyfast11 View Post
or i'd just get a f80 m3 instead that gets 32mpg with 450hp.
I'd be shocked if it gets that unless you really drive it cautiously and mostly on the highway. My dad only gets ~22-23mpg out of his F30 335i, which is fairly far from the EPA numbers (though he has managed to squeeze 32mpg out of it on long highway trips before).
chrisl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 04:46 PM   #161
johnnyfast11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: none yet
Location: Houston
Posts: 187
Thanks: 42
Thanked 67 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl View Post
I'd be shocked if it gets that unless you really drive it cautiously and mostly on the highway. My dad only gets ~22-23mpg out of his F30 335i, which is fairly far from the EPA numbers (though he has managed to squeeze 32mpg out of it on long highway trips before).

the new 2015 f80 m3 does get avg ~~ 30mph. check it out. they've announced it over and over again for the past 12months.

its a completely new engine plant




its more effecient and more powerful than the previous 335i
johnnyfast11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 04:47 PM   #162
DeeezNuuuts83
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: 2006 Evo IX SE
Location: Southern California
Posts: 997
Thanks: 115
Thanked 254 Times in 170 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyfast11 View Post
the new 2015 f80 m3 does get avg ~~ 30mph. check it out. they've announced it over and over again for the past 12months.
30 mph average? That sounds really slow.

:p
DeeezNuuuts83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-30-2014, 05:12 PM   #163
johnnyfast11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: none yet
Location: Houston
Posts: 187
Thanks: 42
Thanked 67 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83 View Post
30 mph average? That sounds really slow.

:p

oh why you so mean to me!

mpg i mean. =[
johnnyfast11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 04:09 PM   #164
blackhawkdown
Senior Member
 
blackhawkdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2012 WRX, 2003 RSX Type S
Location: TN, AK, VA, S. Korea, NC
Posts: 451
Thanks: 12
Thanked 284 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I think I'm gonna jump ship and go get a STi. The look is growing on me and the reviews are awesome. It has everything I'm looking for: power, handling, looks, 4 DOORS, back seats, practicality. As much as I like the BRZ, I believe the STi is on another level when it is compared to the BRZ. I like the old EJ257 as it fits the STi personality. The engine has been improved. The new STi are dyno at 260-270 compared to last years model of 230-240. A 30+- hp increase. Stage 2 is already over 300rwhp.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fatoni View Post
saying they wanted to add weight to improve handling is like saying people wear condoms to improve sex.
blackhawkdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 04:53 PM   #165
Vten
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: Too heavy
Location: Columbus
Posts: 788
Thanks: 91
Thanked 288 Times in 186 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
I think I'm gonna jump ship and go get a STi. The look is growing on me and the reviews are awesome. It has everything I'm looking for: power, handling, looks, 4 DOORS, back seats, practicality. As much as I like the BRZ, I believe the STi is on another level when it is compared to the BRZ. I like the old EJ257 as it fits the STi personality. The engine has been improved. The new STi are dyno at 260-270 compared to last years model of 230-240. A 30+- hp increase. Stage 2 is already over 300rwhp.
Go get em man.... I loves my CWP Sti !
Vten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 05:53 PM   #166
jebuwh
Village Idiot
 
jebuwh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: '13 FR-S Ultramarine Manual
Location: Irvine
Posts: 402
Thanks: 230
Thanked 222 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
I think I'm gonna jump ship and go get a STi. The look is growing on me and the reviews are awesome. It has everything I'm looking for: power, handling, looks, 4 DOORS, back seats, practicality. As much as I like the BRZ, I believe the STi is on another level when it is compared to the BRZ. I like the old EJ257 as it fits the STi personality. The engine has been improved. The new STi are dyno at 260-270 compared to last years model of 230-240. A 30+- hp increase. Stage 2 is already over 300rwhp.
Sti is a ton of fun. No question. Having that power when you mash the pedal down is so addicting.
But... I don't think the handling is on the same level. They handle pretty great for being a heavy, awd, sedan, but not anything like a purpose built, light coupe.
No denying the power and practicality though. I wish I could have both haha.
jebuwh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 08:23 PM   #167
funwheeldrive
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: BANNED FOR TELLING THE TRUTH
Location: MODS ARE ON A POWER TRIP
Posts: 3,447
Thanks: 7,830
Thanked 3,022 Times in 1,409 Posts
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhawkdown View Post
I think I'm gonna jump ship and go get a STi. The look is growing on me and the reviews are awesome. It has everything I'm looking for: power, handling, looks, 4 DOORS, back seats, practicality. As much as I like the BRZ, I believe the STi is on another level when it is compared to the BRZ.
It's on another level because it costs 10k more.
funwheeldrive is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2014, 08:33 PM   #168
wbradley
Sarcastic SOB
 
wbradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Drives: '13 FR-S M6, '23 Volvo V60 CC
Location: Thornhill Ontario
Posts: 4,614
Thanks: 1,344
Thanked 2,844 Times in 1,635 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Garage
An STI is not even remotely comparable to a twin. Not that someone might not enjoy the change, but the STI is an AWD sedan with a significantly higher COG. I feel like I'm on a high horse in my WRX compared to the FR-S. Despite the WRX being brand new and having all the extra amenities, I still almost always choose to drive my twin every day. The way I see it I've got all winter to play with the WRX.

The STI and WRX now have very similar handling except the STI has a tighter steering gear ratio. Down the road I can Cobb tune the WRX for similar power as well if I want to. Right now I am enjoying the much better mileage and the idea of longterm ownership with a newer more efficient engine. The Brembos don'tmmatter much except doing circuit duty. I painted my calipers black with clear coat for a nice stealthy look.
__________________
5:AD kit, HKS V1+ S/C, ECUtek dyno'd, Ohlins MP20, Magnaflow cb, Revworks UEL, Topspeed overpipe, Pinnacle Ceramic tint, VG shark fin, HID's, yellow DRL's, full LEDs, red floor lights, Homelink mirror, trunk lid liner, Perrin LWCP, Valenti smoked, Flossy Grip Tape Shorty, GT86 plaque, lighted vanity mirror, Michelin PSS, Project mU +800, DOT4 fluid, 720 Form GTF1 17x8&9, stitched leather bits, EZ valve.
wbradley is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRZ/FRS vs 2015 WRX Djratrap FR-S / BRZ vs.... 185 09-14-2015 11:47 PM
First look at 2015 Subaru WRX dtrop Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 232 05-11-2015 10:33 AM
2015 Subaru WRX STI vividracing Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 112 02-11-2014 09:48 PM
Thoughts on 2015 WRX vs 13/14 BRZ Antheezy FR-S / BRZ vs.... 286 01-13-2014 05:45 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.