follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Off-Topic Discussions > Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions

Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions Discuss all other cars and automotive news here.


View Poll Results: What name should Toyota use for the production Toyota FT-1?
Supra gets my vote! 367 74.59%
I don't know, but its time for a new name. 125 25.41%
Voters: 492. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2014, 02:04 PM   #421
rice_classic
Senior Member
 
rice_classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Nevermorange FRS
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 4,160
Thanks: 755
Thanked 4,200 Times in 1,803 Posts
Mentioned: 77 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkSunrise View Post
Interesting thanks. When Drive says "it could be a radically different car", I wonder if they just mean the rumored hybrid powerplant or they mean a radically different chassis as well.
Exactly, "radically different" to a design engineer may be only be "slightly different" to the rest of us.

To a person like Tada, changing out the 2.0L boxer for a 2.5L inline would make the 86 a "radically different" car. Often they speak of driving dynamics. Cars could look identical but throw another 40hp at it or modify the suspension settings and "on track" you have a "radically different" car.

He is being deliberately vague on purpose.
__________________
SCCA T4 - FRS
rice_classic is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rice_classic For This Useful Post:
86-tundra (02-10-2014), Dimman (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 02:20 PM   #422
suaveflooder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,295
Thanks: 2,708
Thanked 1,052 Times in 664 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
lol, isn't this supposed to be an FT-1 thread?
suaveflooder is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 02:24 PM   #423
FRSfan111
Sideways and smiling!
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: First 86 FRS 5/8/2012 (second US)
Location: Oregon
Posts: 941
Thanks: 17
Thanked 273 Times in 179 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by thill View Post
Okay but that quote is not directly from Tada nor is it 100% etched in stone. "Hinted", "potentially", and even "concept" leaves a lot of room for interpretation.

I am sure the successor will be different, but that is to be expected. How much different is the real question, and we have not even seen a mid-cycle refresh yet so this is many years away.
+1 I agree
FRSfan111 is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 02:27 PM   #424
STJ
Senior Member
 
STJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Drives: Skyline R33 GTR
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 170
Thanks: 2
Thanked 59 Times in 29 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I really love the direction that Toyota is heading in, unlike Nissan that is handicapping its future by suspending all development of any engine larger than a 1.6! They should really develop their own engine's again and stop mooching off Mercedes.

But back to Toyota, their sports offering should look like this in 2017

- 1.5 FR Levin
- 2.0 FR 86
- 2.0 Turbo 86 Sedan aka new Chaser
- BMW/Toyota sports
- Supra

- Lexus RC
- Lexus LC
- Lexus LFA2
STJ is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 02:29 PM   #425
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
Oh, they're great street cars. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that a well sorted APU Supra is a better street car than an FRS! It's more comfortable, it's got less rattles, it's quieter, it's much better on the highway, it's certainly as fun to drive on backroads.

That being said, "well sorted APU" means less than 600whp on a small, quick spooling turbo. And of course some decent tires.

Regardless, the MKV is likely going to be significantly more refined than the MKIV. And assuming that it will be capable of similar horsepower numbers, it could certainly be an evolution of the MKIV, which is what everyone is craving.
I know what BPU is but have actually never seen the term APU, so while I can deduce the actual meaning of the acronym, that will be thrown out the window and I'll just go ahead and decide that it means "AWESOME POWER UPGRADE!!!!!!!!!1!"
n2oinferno is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to n2oinferno For This Useful Post:
Guff (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 02:33 PM   #426
n2oinferno
Praise Helix!
 
n2oinferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: Accord 2.0T, Silverado
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 2,859
Thanks: 428
Thanked 2,208 Times in 1,072 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by suaveflooder View Post
lol, isn't this supposed to be an FT-1 thread?
Well, nobody has any idea what to post now because it was posted in the FRS General forum and has nothing to do with the FRS.

THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
n2oinferno is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to n2oinferno For This Useful Post:
Dimman (02-10-2014), suaveflooder (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 02:52 PM   #427
Rampage
Senior Member/Old Fanboi
 
Rampage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2000 2ZZ-GE MR2 Spyder HT
Location: Back home in Ohio now
Posts: 2,446
Thanks: 1,931
Thanked 2,014 Times in 915 Posts
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
The only high WHP supra I've been in had enough turbo lag that it felt docile at low RPMs and/or light throttle. So I'd agree that you can control the big power. I had to say outside of the thrill of the HP it was an absolutely horrible street car though.
I have to agree with this. My Supra was a great straight line car but in the twisties it handled very much like my Mustang GT. Hopefully, the new car will be better balanced and lighter than the 80s and 90s models.

Although, I guess it really does not matter much to me. I am never going to own one because I would never drop as much money as they are going to want for it on a car again. I am sooo over that.
__________________
So many modders have more cents than sense!
Rampage is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Rampage For This Useful Post:
Guff (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 02:59 PM   #428
Boxer486
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: small
Location: here
Posts: 697
Thanks: 195
Thanked 262 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave-ROR View Post
Eh, plenty of Japanese cars get a lot of activity. Just because the UAW is big in Detroit doesn't mean auto enthusiasts and buyers who visit are all domestic people. The FRS and BRZ had plenty of activity two years ago. Zero activity this year, I think I saw one person looking at the SWP BRZ they had on the floor. I don't think I even looked at Scion to see what was going on there.

I took a few pics of the FT1. I need to upload the NAIAS pics I took this year.. but I'm lazy. Maybe one day

As for the C7, I like it. I need to drive one still but interior and comp seats are the best that's even been OEM/OEM Optional in a corvette. If they drive anywhere near as good as many people say, I'd have no issues buying one. It probably won't have DI seal failures on track either
Meh, just wanted to take a free jab at domestic crazies that troll around every now and again, lol.

No, but you'll have other issues (like frying your iPhone and god knows what else remains to be seen). This is assuming the so called '24-hour test' they do actually irons out the kinks they've had on the track in the past.

If they would have used the same DIs they use for Lexus, there wouldn't be any DI seal failures.
Boxer486 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Boxer486 For This Useful Post:
Guff (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 03:05 PM   #429
Boxer486
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: small
Location: here
Posts: 697
Thanks: 195
Thanked 262 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
Regardless, the MKV is likely going to be significantly more refined than the MKIV. And assuming that it will be capable of similar horsepower numbers, it could certainly be an evolution of the MKIV, which is what everyone is craving.
This is the thing. Does Toyota really appreciate that people want a Supra because it could take more power than anything out there? Will whatever power plant they release be robust enough to meet or exceed the expectations that people have from the mkIV and GTR crowd? It needs to be bulletproof and respond well to basic mods. That's the inherent character people want preserved I'd imagine. This power plant needs to be BEAST.
Boxer486 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Boxer486 For This Useful Post:
Guff (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 03:39 PM   #430
KAR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout 6spd
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
Thanks: 21
Thanked 163 Times in 100 Posts
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rampage View Post
I have to agree with this. My Supra was a great straight line car but in the twisties it handled very much like my Mustang GT. Hopefully, the new car will be better balanced and lighter than the 80s and 90s models.

Although, I guess it really does not matter much to me. I am never going to own one because I would never drop as much money as they are going to want for it on a car again. I am sooo over that.

hmm, mine handles pretty well on the twisties and even better in the straights, mustang is not even close..
KAR is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 03:45 PM   #431
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
Oh, they're great street cars. In fact, I'd go as far as to say that a well sorted APU Supra is a better street car than an FRS! It's more comfortable, it's got less rattles, it's quieter, it's much better on the highway, it's certainly as fun to drive on backroads.

That being said, "well sorted APU" means less than 600whp on a small, quick spooling turbo. And of course some decent tires.

Regardless, the MKV is likely going to be significantly more refined than the MKIV. And assuming that it will be capable of similar horsepower numbers, it could certainly be an evolution of the MKIV, which is what everyone is craving.
I was specifically talking about the one I was in, which had close to 50% more power than that.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave-ROR For This Useful Post:
Guff (02-10-2014)
Old 02-10-2014, 03:48 PM   #432
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
If they would have used the same DIs they use for Lexus, there wouldn't be any DI seal failures.
If Toyota would have tuned the ECU correctly there wouldn't be any seal failures
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 03:50 PM   #433
Dave-ROR
Site Moderator
 
Dave-ROR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: Stuff
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,317
Thanks: 955
Thanked 5,965 Times in 2,689 Posts
Mentioned: 262 Post(s)
Tagged: 8 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxer486 View Post
This is the thing. Does Toyota really appreciate that people want a Supra because it could take more power than anything out there? Will whatever power plant they release be robust enough to meet or exceed the expectations that people have from the mkIV and GTR crowd? It needs to be bulletproof and respond well to basic mods. That's the inherent character people want preserved I'd imagine. This power plant needs to be BEAST.
Yeah I actually hate the values of Supras being so inflated because they can make stupid power. It's a car I wouldn't mind for a daily driver if the values weren't so high.

Accelerated Performance does have a junkyard of nice MKIV's sitting in their back lot. Would make many fanboys cry I bet.

The sweet spot for HP for me on the street in any reasonable sized/mid weight car is around 400-450HP. Beyond that and it becomes a bit silly. Hell even that is a bit silly. Most drivers can't control it (including myself I'm sure) hence all the dumb driver aids on all these cars.
__________________
-Dave
Track cars: 2013 Scion FRS, 1998 Acura Integra Type-R, 1993 Honda Civic Hatchback
DD: 2005 Acura TSX
Tow: 2022 F-450
Toys: 2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 1993 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1994 Toyota MR2 Turbo, 1991 Mitsubishi Galant VR-4
Parts: 2015 Subaru BRZ Limited, 2005 Acura TSX
Projects: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited track car build
FS: 2004 GMC Sierra 2500 LT CCSB 8.1/Allison with 99k miles
Dave-ROR is offline  
Old 02-10-2014, 03:54 PM   #434
suaveflooder
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,295
Thanks: 2,708
Thanked 1,052 Times in 664 Posts
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by n2oinferno View Post
Well, nobody has any idea what to post now because it was posted in the FRS General forum and has nothing to do with the FRS.

THIS IS WHY WE CAN'T HAVE NICE THINGS!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
suaveflooder is offline  
 
Closed Thread

Tags
bmwforsuckers, boring-zzzzzzzzzzzzz, brz, celica supra confirmed, frs, ft-1, hatch-y +1, morethanucanaffordpal, nomanualnogo, supra, toyota, twins, watstheretailon1ofthose

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toyota FR-S : Official Name for the FT-86 Concept? Dark Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 155 08-04-2010 11:05 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.