follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 2nd Gens: GR86 and BRZ > GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86)

GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) General topics for the GR86 second-gen 86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-03-2021, 02:14 PM   #85
Sasquachulator
Pavement Grey
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2020 Toyota 86 GT, 2017 BMW X1
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,113
Thanks: 109
Thanked 2,247 Times in 1,219 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PulsarBeeerz View Post
Well it would be lighter and rev higher for sure. More power...IDK The FA24 is only 10whp behind full stock vs a K24A that with full bolt-ons makes 220whp.
it also makes a buttload more torque stock for stock.
a K24 at its highest rated torque makes 159 lb/ft at 6100 RPM and looks to be
(most configs seems to be around 140 lb/ft @ 4000rpm)

The FA24 is making 184 @ 3700rpm.
Sasquachulator is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sasquachulator For This Useful Post:
Yoshoobaroo (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 02:24 PM   #86
Yoshoobaroo
TRACKBREAD
 
Yoshoobaroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,929
Thanks: 2,660
Thanked 4,031 Times in 1,898 Posts
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Car & Driver Comparison Test Review: Veloster N vs. GTI vs. BRZ vs. GR86

I’ll say this, I finally did a WOT 1st-2nd-3rd in my 2022 last night, and it doesn’t pin you in your seat the way a fat turbo 6cyl in a bigger car does, but I was caught off guard by how soon I had to shift up in both gears.
Yoshoobaroo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Yoshoobaroo For This Useful Post:
Dzmitry (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 03:09 PM   #87
TommyW
Senior Member
 
TommyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,492
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I asked CSG Mike in another thread what he though about the performance difference was like between a tuned with header Gen 1 and a stock Gen 2 and he said it was pretty close.
TommyW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TommyW For This Useful Post:
Dzmitry (12-03-2021), nikitopo (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 03:43 PM   #88
FrickingReallySlow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: San francisco
Posts: 364
Thanks: 153
Thanked 157 Times in 103 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Dude mentions lightweight flywheel on Gen2 from the factory? I didn't know that was changed. Is this true, I don't recall this being mentioned anywhere
FrickingReallySlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2021, 04:04 PM   #89
Dzmitry
Senior Member
 
Dzmitry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited with PP
Location: Phildalphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 975
Thanks: 2,123
Thanked 609 Times in 391 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
I don't think the standard tires are slower in a straight line.
2018 BRZ tS with Pilot Sport 4 tires did 0-60 in 6.3s, 1/4-mile in 14.9s @ 94mph
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-drive-review/
2017 BRZ with Primacies did 0-60 in 6.2s, 1/4-mile in 14.8s @ 95mph
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...l-test-review/

Trap speed in particular isn't as strongly correlated with tire grip as ET is anyway. The new car is legitimately ~6mph faster and upwards of a second quicker in the 1/4, that is a pretty big gain in performance, and more than anyone expected.

I'd say that's a pretty big delta, new car does 5-60 in 90% of the time the last-gen took. That's a bigger difference than 1/4-mile times (new car covers the 1/4 in about 94% of the time of last-gen).

I don't think stating actual measured performance new vs. old is overstating anything. New car is quicker, period. By a bigger margin than advertised or expected. Good news!

I really don't get all the weeping and wailing about *others* saying "it's too slow". Yeah, it's slowish for a sporty/performance oriented car. The new car is significantly less slow, which is a good thing if you ask me.

I don't think anyone is. We have acceleration data, we all know what it will do. Nobody is thinking it's now a supercar.

Being a bit quicker/faster does matter to a lot of us. And yeah, in the real world the driver should feel quite a bit more urge with throttle input what with +20% more torque most places and +30% or so in the midrange.

Long/short: it's a significant bump in performance, which a lot of people appreciate.
You are talking about tires not making much of a difference in your example. Yet with gen2, Cammisa pulled off a 0-60 in 5.6s with rollout, which is a whole 0.3s less than C&D managed with the better tires.

Your percentage relation that you make just goes to back up my point of the new car not being wonders faster than the old.

Never said it wasn't quicker or even a good bit quicker, I've admitted to the fact and absolutely love that part about it. I agree that it's a good thing that the new one is faster than the old. I was never about the "this car is too slow" life, I've loved my gen1 since the first day I sat in it. Nothing has changed there.

I feel like some on here are thinking it has become a supercar (not literally). Supercar enough to beat the GTI and Veloster N based on those 0-60 and quarter mile numbers that have been thrown out there.

I guess I may be misinterpreting what most people are saying on here then. Because it seems like many are using big words to talk about how much faster this second gen really is. But then again, i'm not disagreeing with the facts, the second gen is clearly faster, and by a good bit, just not something out of this world. I was more supporting Tcoat's reasoning for the future of complaints that will be coming. Because after all, it's not speed demon, and a minivan can still keep up with it no problem as I pointed out (and that minivan is due for a new gen soon). I was also rebutting some of the statements about this car being faster than the GTI and Veloster N purely based on 0-60 and quarter mile times. Again, these metrics are just not common for MOST users of this car on a daily basis. They only really count for those that race it. Otherwise I'm in agreement to the basic truths here - that this car is faster, and by more than expected/hoped. I am very excited for that and plan on keeping my gen1 when purchasing a gen2, just to have them both as a collection.
Dzmitry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2021, 04:08 PM   #90
Dzmitry
Senior Member
 
Dzmitry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited with PP
Location: Phildalphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 975
Thanks: 2,123
Thanked 609 Times in 391 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyW View Post
I asked CSG Mike in another thread what he though about the performance difference was like between a tuned with header Gen 1 and a stock Gen 2 and he said it was pretty close.
This is based on the reference I was making. Doesn't blow my mind to think that my header-tuned BRZ with flex-fuel is probably about on par if not a bit quicker than the gen2.
Dzmitry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2021, 04:34 PM   #91
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,631
Thanks: 1,412
Thanked 3,961 Times in 2,069 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dzmitry View Post
You are talking about tires not making much of a difference in your example. Yet with gen2, Cammisa pulled off a 0-60 in 5.6s with rollout, which is a whole 0.3s less than C&D managed with the better tires.
So maybe gen2 is even MORE faster than gen1? Or could Cammisa be 0.3 quicker in the gen1 as well?

I stick with C and D for some consistency, not because they're necessarily the "fastest" numbers.

Quote:
Your percentage relation that you make just goes to back up my point of the new car not being wonders faster than the old.
Most would say that +6mph in the 1/4 an around a second quicker is significantly quicker/faster. We were only expecting about half that.

Quote:
I was more supporting Tcoat's reasoning for the future of complaints that will be coming.
So you guys are being sure to PRE-complain about those complaints, before they even happen?!

Quote:
Again, these metrics are just not common for MOST users of this car on a daily basis. They only really count for those that race it.
I disagree. If anything, people will feel it more on a daily basis as the midrange is filled in so well, whereas at the track the drawback of the gen1 torque dip was barely noticeable because revs are always above that.

No, most people aren't going to flat-out max accelerate 0-60 or for 1/4-mile, but they'll still feel increased torque at any rpm. For sure the new car should feel a bit more "eager"


Quote:
Otherwise I'm in agreement to the basic truths here - that this car is faster, and by more than expected/hoped. I am very excited for that and plan on keeping my gen1 when purchasing a gen2, just to have them both as a collection.

I'll probably swap over to new gen late '22 or early '23...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2021, 04:38 PM   #92
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,631
Thanks: 1,412
Thanked 3,961 Times in 2,069 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyW View Post
I asked CSG Mike in another thread what he though about the performance difference was like between a tuned with header Gen 1 and a stock Gen 2 and he said it was pretty close.
From what I've seen, a good EL 4-1 header with a well-developed tune for it can be worth upwards of +10hp on a '17+. That's not going to touch a new one. I think you'd have to have full exhaust, intake(?), and E85 to come close, but based on what we're seeing seems like that would still come up short.

I mean, +30whp from a header and a tune, I just don't see that happenin...
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
alphasaur (12-03-2021), Yoshoobaroo (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 04:39 PM   #93
timurrrr
Senior Member
 
timurrrr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2019
Drives: 2022 GR86
Location: Between Sonoma and Laguna Seca
Posts: 1,721
Thanks: 2,143
Thanked 1,318 Times in 727 Posts
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dzmitry View Post
You are talking about tires not making much of a difference in your example. Yet with gen2, Cammisa pulled off a 0-60 in 5.6s with rollout, which is a whole 0.3s less than C&D managed with the better tires.
There are a lot of variables when it comes to 0–60, and that's why @ZDan prefers the full quarter mile numbers, trap speed in particular.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dzmitry View Post
I was more supporting Tcoat's reasoning for the future of complaints that will be coming. Because after all, it's not speed demon, and a minivan can still keep up with it no problem as I pointed out (and that minivan is due for a new gen soon).
There will always be a faster car.
Go to a Lamborghini forum, and you will find people upset that some 7-seater SUV has a better 0-60 than their Aventador SVJ STO Performante (Model X).
Heck, even a non-EV Dodge Durango SRT Hellcat does 0–60 in mid-3's nowadays.

I think the real difference between 1st gen and 2nd gen is that with the 1st gen stock, even some "pure" enthusiasts sometimes needed excuses sometimes.
In contrast, the performance of the 2022's is on par with competition in the same price range, except for perhaps the EcoBoost Mustang.
For people who want significantly faster car (30%? 40%? when is it enough?), or better handling than the EcoBoost Mustang, they can go ahead and shop in the next price bracket.
timurrrr is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to timurrrr For This Useful Post:
TommyW (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 05:01 PM   #94
PulsarBeeerz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 939
Thanks: 681
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dzmitry View Post
This is based on the reference I was making. Doesn't blow my mind to think that my header-tuned BRZ with flex-fuel is probably about on par if not a bit quicker than the gen2.
I don't think so since your Gen1 doesnt make as much power. There aren't any Gen1s running 13.9 @101 with 215s street tires..
PulsarBeeerz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PulsarBeeerz For This Useful Post:
alphasaur (12-03-2021), timurrrr (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 05:26 PM   #95
TommyW
Senior Member
 
TommyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Drives: '13 Whiteout
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 1,492
Thanks: 496
Thanked 1,242 Times in 673 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZDan View Post
From what I've seen, a good EL 4-1 header with a well-developed tune for it can be worth upwards of +10hp on a '17+. That's not going to touch a new one. I think you'd have to have full exhaust, intake(?), and E85 to come close, but based on what we're seeing seems like that would still come up short.

I mean, +30whp from a header and a tune, I just don't see that happenin...
I have a header and a dyno tune by Zach and I'll tell you its a lot more than 10 hp.
TommyW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2021, 05:28 PM   #96
ZDan
Senior Member
 
ZDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,631
Thanks: 1,412
Thanked 3,961 Times in 2,069 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyW View Post
I have a header and a dyno tune by Zach and I'll tell you its a lot more than 10 hp.
I do to, and it's a lot less than 10hp...

If header and tune are your only mods, no way you're seeing 101mph in the 1/4.
ZDan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ZDan For This Useful Post:
timurrrr (12-03-2021), Yoshoobaroo (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 05:31 PM   #97
sds
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: '22 BRZ Limited 6MT
Location: MA
Posts: 81
Thanks: 8
Thanked 60 Times in 36 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Measurements from multiple, reliable outlets at this point have shown this is a 100-101 mph trap car. This points to a substantial power difference from a gen 1 car. There's no way around it.

Measurements from several dynos (including two from King motorsports) point to a ~210WHP dynojet (SAE) reading. This is in line with the trap speed indicated above.

Finally, anecdotal evidence from videos (including the "race" against the bolt-on 8th gen) simply add more to the mountain of evidence that the difference between the FA24 and FA20 is more than just 23-28hp.

Now onto speculation:
The Gen 2 (FA24) is underrated:
1. If it were not underrated, it would imply a RWD manual drivetrain loss of 8%, which is unheard of, and regardless, not in line with the drivetrain loss of the first gen car, which was in the teens (percentage wise). Nothing magical was done to the transmission and differential across generations to explain this discrepancy.

2. If the drivetrain loss was more along the lines of the first gen car, it would imply a crank rating of 240hp. An estimate of 240hp is also substantiated by the 100-101mph trap speed.
sds is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sds For This Useful Post:
alphasaur (12-03-2021), daiheadjai (12-03-2021), DarkSunrise (12-03-2021), Ryephile (12-05-2021), timurrrr (12-03-2021), ZDan (12-03-2021)
Old 12-03-2021, 05:42 PM   #98
alphasaur
friendly
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Drives: 17' 86
Location: Dutchess County, NY
Posts: 731
Thanks: 1,478
Thanked 483 Times in 293 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Trap speed is the most reliable way to consistently measure a cars power, and 6mph is strongly suggestive of the HP improvement being more than 23 crank horsepower.

edit: oops didn't see sds post which pretty much says the same thing
__________________
Seek comfort in discomfort.
alphasaur is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GR86/BRZ Comparison Articles Kona61 GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) 74 01-02-2022 09:39 AM
GR86/BRZ Track Comparison (Japanese) Kona61 GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) 95 12-24-2021 07:36 PM
2022 GR86 & BRZ Post Serious Performance Numbers (Nearly 1g Skidpad)! [C&D Review] Hachiroku GR86 General Topics (2nd Gen 2022+ Toyota 86) 3 11-24-2021 08:18 AM
Drift King Video Test: Gazoo Racing GR86 vs. BRZ STI TofuJoe Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 1 03-15-2018 09:21 PM
what will be the BRZ first comparison test? BMWDAD BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 8 12-18-2011 04:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.