follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2017, 09:15 PM   #365
wrh3
billswebspace.com
 
wrh3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2017 Alfa 4C, 2019 Fiat 124 Abarth
Location: United States
Posts: 59
Thanks: 65
Thanked 39 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
Was not ....... I liked mine .......


humfrz
I liked mine as well, great car after a few mods
__________________
Bill
BillsWebSpace.com
wrh3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wrh3 For This Useful Post:
humfrz (05-18-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 09:46 AM   #366
Gforce
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Alberta
Posts: 519
Thanks: 39
Thanked 161 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post

...
Doesn't matter if you would rather run it in back there are loads that do not. FWD can handle every bit of HP that RWD can if they engineer things right. Yes they have to deal with torque steer but that is no different than RWD having to deal with the rear end kicking out at high HP launch. Will they stop making high level Mustangs and turn them all into AWD just because people keep losing them on launch and bouncing off curbs (and crowds)?


...
Actually not. The DOT tires available reach their limit around 300 bhp at the moment. The cars you mention definitely do not handle their power well, or even correctly.

Renault, VWAG and Ford have put around 300 bhp (with turbo engines, the torque is actually the relevant number) through the front wherls only. Both Ford and VWAG have now gone awd to get more power down. Renault hadn't increased the power. Honda unwisely retained fwd for their Europe version of the Civic type R which is a handful to drive as a result.
Gforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 09:49 AM   #367
Gforce
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ
Location: Alberta
Posts: 519
Thanks: 39
Thanked 161 Times in 109 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8RZ View Post
Wrong, The NC (third gen) was the first complete re-design, and was hated by all.
Guess the PR guys really fooled you all. Good for them. The NC was an open top version of the RX8. Odd that Mazda tried to make it look the same as the previous version.

NC production cycle was 10 years, which was the point under discussion.
Gforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 09:53 AM   #368
Cole
Not a troll
 
Cole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Drives: FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,104
Thanks: 8,237
Thanked 5,399 Times in 2,694 Posts
Mentioned: 266 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gforce View Post
Actually not. The DOT tires available reach their limit around 300 bhp at the moment. The cars you mention definitely do not handle their power well, or even correctly.

Renault, VWAG and Ford have put around 300 bhp (with turbo engines, the torque is actually the relevant number) through the front wherls only. Both Ford and VWAG have now gone awd to get more power down. Renault hadn't increased the power. Honda unwisely retained fwd for their Europe version of the Civic type R which is a handful to drive as a result.
Are you fucked? The mustang handles the power well. It's their drivers who don't. Ford and VW have gone to AWD on their top tier models, as in 40k and above, more than likely to try and steal some sales from the STi. And the new Civic Type-R is tearing up tracks around the world.

Feel free to prove me wrong, but I highly doubt you will, since you usually only bring anecdotal evidence to the table.
Cole is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Cole For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (05-19-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 10:19 AM   #369
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gforce View Post
Guess the PR guys really fooled you all. Good for them. The NC was an open top version of the RX8. Odd that Mazda tried to make it look the same as the previous version.

NC production cycle was 10 years, which was the point under discussion.
RX8 was an abortion of a car, after my test drive I never looked back.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 10:22 AM   #370
D_Thissen
Senior Member
 
D_Thissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: '13 Argento FR-S (Sold)
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 3,209
Thanked 1,439 Times in 855 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
DOT tires reach their limit at 300bhp?
__________________
D_Thissen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to D_Thissen For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (05-19-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 10:27 AM   #371
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gforce View Post
Guess the PR guys really fooled you all. Good for them. The NC was an open top version of the RX8. Odd that Mazda tried to make it look the same as the previous version.

NC production cycle was 10 years, which was the point under discussion.
You really can't grasp the concept of platform sharing can you? Yes they share the same base platform. It ends there. One is not a "version" of the other they are still two radically different cars.

Clearly these are all just slightly different versions of the same car!





__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
8RZ (05-19-2017), D_Thissen (05-19-2017), jubella2 (05-19-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 10:32 AM   #372
D_Thissen
Senior Member
 
D_Thissen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: '13 Argento FR-S (Sold)
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,126
Thanks: 3,209
Thanked 1,439 Times in 855 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Pretty sure the M/T ET street radial is DOT approved and will hold more than 300bhp. Also, I feel like torque is the bigger issue when hooking up vs horsepower.
__________________
D_Thissen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 12:19 PM   #373
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,869
Thanks: 28,791
Thanked 31,816 Times in 16,425 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gforce View Post
Guess the PR guys really fooled you all. Good for them. The NC was an open top version of the RX8. Odd that Mazda tried to make it look the same as the previous version.

NC production cycle was 10 years, which was the point under discussion.
..... my recollection is that the NC didn't share ANY parts from the previous versions of the miata ...... nor did it share ANY parts from the RX-8 ......


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to humfrz For This Useful Post:
8RZ (05-19-2017), Cole (05-19-2017), funwheeldrive (05-19-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 12:45 PM   #374
8RZ
The Gunshine State
 
8RZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Drives: '14 BRZ Limited
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,463
Thanks: 631
Thanked 1,163 Times in 587 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
..... my recollection is that the NC didn't share ANY parts from the previous versions of the miata ...... nor did it share ANY parts from the RX-8 ......


humfrz
You are correct, just goes to show how much mis-information @Gfraud is spewing. Please stop posting and research more @Gforce.
__________________

Current DD: M235i
8RZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 12:52 PM   #375
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,733
Thanked 9,479 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
..... nor did it share ANY parts from the RX-8 ......
Maybe they never came with the same parts, but some parts are interchangeable between the NC and FE.

https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=382721
https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=620715

Brakes, hubs, sway bars, seats, windshield wiper switches
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guff View Post
ineedyourdiddly
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 01:28 PM   #376
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by humfrz View Post
..... my recollection is that the NC didn't share ANY parts from the previous versions of the miata ...... nor did it share ANY parts from the RX-8 ......


humfrz
It did indeed share the same platform as the RX8 but like I said above the platform does not make it the same. Loads of radically different vehicles share platforms.

"NC
The NC utilizes a version of the RX-8 chassis, shortened accordingly. Many suspension and braking components are interchangeable."
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
8RZ (05-19-2017), humfrz (05-19-2017)
Old 05-19-2017, 02:34 PM   #377
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,869
Thanks: 28,791
Thanked 31,816 Times in 16,425 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
It did indeed share the same platform as the RX8 but like I said above the platform does not make it the same. Loads of radically different vehicles share platforms.

"NC
The NC utilizes a version of the RX-8 chassis, shortened accordingly. Many suspension and braking components are interchangeable."
Well, I reckon we "see" platforms differently. To me a shortened "platform", makes it a different platform.......

Yep, my bad on the suspension and brakes part ......


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2017, 02:41 PM   #378
humfrz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S, white, MT
Location: Puyallup, WA
Posts: 29,869
Thanks: 28,791
Thanked 31,816 Times in 16,425 Posts
Mentioned: 708 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by strat61caster View Post
Maybe they never came with the same parts, but some parts are interchangeable between the NC and FE.

https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=382721
https://forum.miata.net/vb/showthread.php?t=620715

Brakes, hubs, sway bars, seats, windshield wiper switches
True, some of the parts are interchangeable. Usually, the interchangeable RX-8 parts are beefed up, compared to the NC parts.

I was having a bit of a senior moment .....


humfrz
humfrz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to humfrz For This Useful Post:
strat61caster (05-19-2017)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Serious Question: Save for possible future BRZ tS, or throw money at current BRZ? Kostamojen BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 72 05-08-2017 02:40 PM
Bad Sign for Future Twins, or Blessing? [Article] Koa Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 14 11-19-2014 11:09 PM
a turbo in the twins future??? AndyJ Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 19 05-07-2014 04:46 PM
Twins vs future competition regal FR-S / BRZ vs.... 69 07-12-2013 08:51 AM
Future of the "twins" regal Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 85 06-05-2013 08:54 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.