follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-22-2019, 03:36 PM   #491
new2subaru
Weight Weenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseG View Post
The new styling on the 86 has grown on me. I miss the boxer piston badge on the front quarter panels. LED headlights and taillights are also a nice upgrade.

I’m sure the Veloster N is a fun drive, the mini 3rd door is cool. Throwing extra power at a car has drawbacks though, especially FWD. I think only Honda understands that type of black magic. If the 2nd gen twins get a decent bump in power and torque, and keep it NA I will be happy. (Say 220HP 170 lb/ft). Eliminate the torque dip and it will feel so much better.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I’ll take torque dip over torque steer anyday. At least one of them is fixable. I had a Veloster Turbo and enjoyed it but it’s not an 86. Like anything there’s good and bad.
new2subaru is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to new2subaru For This Useful Post:
ermax (09-24-2019), JesseG (09-22-2019)
Old 09-22-2019, 05:25 PM   #492
JesseG
Senior Member
 
JesseG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Drives: 2016 Scion FR-S
Location: Dallas
Posts: 806
Thanks: 2,685
Thanked 393 Times in 266 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2subaru View Post
I’ll take torque dip over torque steer anyday. At least one of them is fixable. I had a Veloster Turbo and enjoyed it but it’s not an 86. Like anything there’s good and bad.


Me too, I would rather pedal my FR-S than drive the Veloster It will never be an 86

That being said Subie and Toyota could help eliminate the torque dip. I’ve always thought it was an emissions thing, but who knows. The engineers at both companies have forgotten more about cars than I will ever learn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JesseG is offline  
Old 09-22-2019, 11:08 PM   #493
new2subaru
Weight Weenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseG View Post
Me too, I would rather pedal my FR-S than drive the Veloster It will never be an 86

That being said Subie and Toyota could help eliminate the torque dip. I’ve always thought it was an emissions thing, but who knows. The engineers at both companies have forgotten more about cars than I will ever learn.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol. I think it’s emissions thing too.
new2subaru is offline  
Old 09-23-2019, 01:50 AM   #494
Clutch Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2017 BRZ PP , 2005 Saab 97X
Location: CA
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 754
Thanked 721 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
the "torque dip" is an engine design issue with intake harmonics.

you can 'tune' it out but it takes specific intake and exhaust sizes and really finite tuning


this is a porsche 718 dyno and you can see even boosted it has a "dip" in torque




flat engines are weird. Turbos can help a whole bunch but you have a turbulence inside the intake that cant be easily fixed with a single intake ported throttle body.

Id like to see a dual plenum crossed intake system with an EL header to prove a point


and the only reason i bring this up as intake and exhaust harmonics is due to a ported Ej251 I had in my 2.5rs with EL headers from TWE and flow matched intake manifold ( not just ported but individual runners where matched)

still had a torque dip
Clutch Dog is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Clutch Dog For This Useful Post:
JesseG (09-23-2019), new2subaru (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 02:18 AM   #495
Impureclient
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2015
Drives: 2015 FR-S
Location: NPR, Florida
Posts: 2,404
Thanks: 1,802
Thanked 2,903 Times in 1,282 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Always so many excuses for Toyota/Subaru to not bump power to at least equal of other manufacturers coming out with more power for the same $ we paid.
I mean I'm not trading my FRS in for no Veloster, Civic or any other ugly looking car coming out lately even if they had 400hp and still stay sub $30k.
But come on Toyota/Subaru...just lose more and more customers by not giving everybody what they ask for and see how that goes. For me all it will
take is for somebody to come out with something reasonably sporty looking that wasn't designed by a child and a significant bump in power and I'm out.
If Honda brings back something similar to a S2000 with that K20C1 or some probably better variant, they'll be so many people jumping ship.
Impureclient is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Impureclient For This Useful Post:
JesseG (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 02:38 AM   #496
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Easy fix is to drop the boxer design and throw a inline 4 under the bonnet.

A little 1.6 or 1.8 - 2.0 with a small snail would do the trick.

Current gearbox "might" be adequate.
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
Clutch Dog (09-23-2019), JesseG (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 02:45 AM   #497
Clutch Dog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Drives: 2017 BRZ PP , 2005 Saab 97X
Location: CA
Posts: 1,052
Thanks: 754
Thanked 721 Times in 405 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86MLR View Post
Easy fix is to drop the boxer design and throw a inline 4 under the bonnet.

A little 1.6 or 1.8 - 2.0 with a small snail would do the trick.

Current gearbox "might" be adequate.
Why stop at a 2 liter?

Bring bacl the big gun 2.5 with some spicey heads? Turn it over 20 degrees like a BMW. Engine to make it fit better in a lower hood line and let it rip tater chip

The current trans is the same aisin as in the turbo solstice and is similar to the s2000 and rx8 transmissions. It'll. Hold a solid 350 ft lbs.
Clutch Dog is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Clutch Dog For This Useful Post:
JesseG (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 03:16 AM   #498
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clutch Dog View Post
Why stop at a 2 liter?

Bring bacl the big gun 2.5 with some spicey heads? Turn it over 20 degrees like a BMW. Engine to make it fit better in a lower hood line and let it rip tater chip

The current trans is the same aisin as in the turbo solstice and is similar to the s2000 and rx8 transmissions. It'll. Hold a solid 350 ft lbs.
A BMW engine could be a thing, given Supra partnership

But, to keep the car in its price bracket of "cheap car", going overboard will never happen.

You have the Supra for that, and there is no way in hell they will power up the 86 to be in a similar ball park power wise as the Supra.

Plus 90% of owners want a nice sporty looking car with good fuel economy, cheap rego and cheap insurance, handling and power really isn't a big buying point

If you want a bit more mumbo, do what I did, a AVO turbo does wonders for a little boost in power and still keep reliability

Opinions may vary
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
JesseG (09-23-2019), Tcoat (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 06:27 AM   #499
new2subaru
Weight Weenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Drives: 15 FR-S
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,584
Thanks: 5,015
Thanked 2,330 Times in 1,346 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clutch Dog View Post
the "torque dip" is an engine design issue with intake harmonics.

you can 'tune' it out but it takes specific intake and exhaust sizes and really finite tuning


this is a porsche 718 dyno and you can see even boosted it has a "dip" in torque




flat engines are weird. Turbos can help a whole bunch but you have a turbulence inside the intake that cant be easily fixed with a single intake ported throttle body.

Id like to see a dual plenum crossed intake system with an EL header to prove a point


and the only reason i bring this up as intake and exhaust harmonics is due to a ported Ej251 I had in my 2.5rs with EL headers from TWE and flow matched intake manifold ( not just ported but individual runners where matched)

still had a torque dip
I don’t enough about it to agree or disagree. Why is it that just about every aftermarket UEL or EL with a tune all but eliminates it?
new2subaru is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to new2subaru For This Useful Post:
JesseG (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 07:15 AM   #500
86MLR
Senior Member
 
86MLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Drives: 2002 VX Commodore SS LS1 Auto
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,203
Thanks: 500
Thanked 2,185 Times in 1,111 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by new2subaru View Post
I don’t enough about it to agree or disagree. Why is it that just about every aftermarket UEL or EL with a tune all but eliminates it?
NA, they typically don't

Marketing is a wonderful thing

Smoothing does wonders too

In the end the torque dip isn't really a issue, but marketing psychology make people think it is, so therefore it is
__________________
Disclaimer: This post represents the official views of the voices in my head at the time of posting.
http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=133311
I'm only here for the biscuits
86MLR is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to 86MLR For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 07:22 AM   #501
why?
Only happy when it rains.
 
why?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: series.blue
Location: Harnett county NC
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 5,698
Thanked 1,263 Times in 749 Posts
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Impureclient View Post
Always so many excuses for Toyota/Subaru to not bump power to at least equal of other manufacturers coming out with more power for the same $ we paid.
I mean I'm not trading my FRS in for no Veloster, Civic or any other ugly looking car coming out lately even if they had 400hp and still stay sub $30k.
But come on Toyota/Subaru...just lose more and more customers by not giving everybody what they ask for and see how that goes. For me all it will
take is for somebody to come out with something reasonably sporty looking that wasn't designed by a child and a significant bump in power and I'm out.
If Honda brings back something similar to a S2000 with that K20C1 or some probably better variant, they'll be so many people jumping ship.
Toyota and Subaru make bank selling people what they want. Safe low powered cars that get great gas mileage. Even the 2.5 in the Camry makes only 206 hp and 186 lb ft of torque, and it is the best selling car in the USA.

Quote:
Originally Posted by new2subaru View Post
I don’t enough about it to agree or disagree. Why is it that just about every aftermarket UEL or EL with a tune all but eliminates it?
Because they eliminate the cat. You gut the cats on the stock exhaust and you'll get about the same thing.
why? is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to why? For This Useful Post:
new2subaru (09-23-2019)
Old 09-23-2019, 07:54 AM   #502
Riftur
Senior Member
 
Riftur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Florida
Posts: 582
Thanks: 235
Thanked 176 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesseG View Post
The new styling on the 86 has grown on me. I miss the boxer piston badge on the front quarter panels. LED headlights and taillights are also a nice upgrade.

I’m sure the Veloster N is a fun drive, the mini 3rd door is cool. Throwing extra power at a car has drawbacks though, especially FWD. I think only Honda understands that type of black magic. If the 2nd gen twins get a decent bump in power and torque, and keep it NA I will be happy. (Say 220HP 170 lb/ft). Eliminate the torque dip and it will feel so much better.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I personally would love to see 200HP at the wheels. I believe they should keep it NA also. I thought the newer versions would grow on me also, but it really hasn't. The one I saw had no rear spoiler and it looked so bare without it. When they first changed the front grill, it was horrible but looks a lot better now that they added some shape to make it look meaner. The rest of the car, especially the rear, is way to big looking and it ruined the sleekness on the rest of the car. It just does not seem to flow as well anymore. Maybe its just me.
Riftur is offline  
Old 09-23-2019, 07:59 AM   #503
Riftur
Senior Member
 
Riftur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Drives: 2013 Scion FR-S
Location: Florida
Posts: 582
Thanks: 235
Thanked 176 Times in 111 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoshoobaroo View Post
Veloster N is FWD and weighs 250lbs more. it’s like comparing apples and goldfish
I think you missed the point I was trying to make. My point was, a Veloster should not have more horsepower than an 86 since the 86 is a real sportscar. It just does not seem right. I also strongly believe the 86 should be more powerful than a miata and a civic. It does not need to be the base model but there should be a version we could buy that is. It seems every other car is getting more powerful except the 86.
Riftur is offline  
Old 09-23-2019, 08:29 AM   #504
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riftur View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make. My point was, a Veloster should not have more horsepower than an 86 since the 86 is a real sportscar. It just does not seem right. I also strongly believe the 86 should be more powerful than a miata and a civic. It does not need to be the base model but there should be a version we could buy that is. It seems every other car is getting more powerful except the 86.
Historically "sports cars" have always been lower horse power. They were always built to be small, light and nimble not powerful. This whole concept that they need huge horse power came along about the same time that cars that would never have been classed as sports started to be called that. It took the Miata almost 30 years to get a significant HP bump. Comparing others and saying "they should have less" is just playing a numbers game.
Personally I don't care how much power the others have it doesn't make them better cars.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
nikitopo (09-23-2019), Tokay444 (09-23-2019), why? (09-24-2019)
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I'd read it was possible but here is confirmation Bodalenko AUSTRALIA 22 09-14-2015 08:57 PM
Part confirmation SubaSteve Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 0 05-25-2014 06:15 PM
Pioneer AVIC-X940BT confirmation FR-Shadow Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 35 11-29-2012 05:08 PM
Confirmation BRZ nav can play DVDs R0ME0 Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 21 11-14-2012 07:25 PM
Driver side controls confirmation please phanguy Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 2 07-31-2012 03:17 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.