2023 Honda Civic Type R Spied / 11th gen Civic

[Mike_ZN6]

This is what I see when I look at the current CTR:

[NoHaveMSG]

Originally Posted by Tcoat

Amazing how different it looks when they cover up the 198 fake vents!

197 vents, don't be over dramatic.

[Tcoat]

Originally Posted by NoHaveMSG

197 vents, don't be over dramatic.

You need to look behind the fake vents to find the other fake vents.

[tehShirt]

Looks like a Honda Accord Type R. I'm personally holding off though until the Odyssey Type R.

[JD001]

Originally Posted by gymratter

theyre pulling a Porsche :p

The way it's sitting it looks like it's pushing from the rear wheels.. AWD??

[sato]

Originally Posted by spike021

I realize it’s camouflaged on purpose but absolutely none of that looks even the slightest bit good. Massively turned off right now.

I didn't feel even the slightest jewel reaction, be it a Honda, BMW, or whatever.

[gymratter]

https://www.civicxi.com/forum/thread...-images.49714/








Comparison with the patent images for the current (10th) gen Civic Hatchback

[beltax90]

Originally Posted by gymratter

https://www.civicxi.com/forum/thread...-images.49714/








Comparison with the patent images for the current (10th) gen Civic Hatchback

def appreciate them toning it down this time around. helps the overall design to be less chunky. cleaner and longer/sleeker taillights (the idea reminds me of what the next gen 86 is trying to achieve from the side. rear straight on view of the taillights has very porsche like essence to it. especially thanks to that all the rage lightbar)

also minus the fake vents in the rear is a plus. also loved how they stretched out and better integrated the c pillar with the rest of the rear end (simplified by lessening the effect of the kink and making the beltline flat while also integrating the trunkline with the outline of the window)

creases arent as aggressive this time around which im all for. everything these days is too dyanmic.

again appreciate toning it down in the front but from a side view the front looks a little lumpy/chunky up top between the headlights

overall well done i think. a type r version i think would be slick

[vh_supra26]

https://www.civicxi.com/forum/thread...ok-like.49722/

[Jordanwolf]

Originally Posted by beltax90

def appreciate them toning it down this time around. helps the overall design to be less chunky. cleaner and longer/sleeker taillights (the idea reminds me of what the next gen 86 is trying to achieve from the side. rear straight on view of the taillights has very porsche like essence to it. especially thanks to that all the rage lightbar)

also minus the fake vents in the rear is a plus. also loved how they stretched out and better integrated the c pillar with the rest of the rear end (simplified by lessening the effect of the kink and making the beltline flat while also integrating the trunkline with the outline of the window)

creases arent as aggressive this time around which im all for. everything these days is too dyanmic.

again appreciate toning it down in the front but from a side view the front looks a little lumpy/chunky up top between the headlights

overall well done i think. a type r version i think would be slick

It will be good looking I think, but I would prefer more aggressive. The people that buy Type-R's want aggressive if you ask me. The people that say they want it toned down were never going to buy a Type-R.

[vh_supra26]

More fan art.

https://www.civicxi.com/forum/thread...derings.49724/

[Dadhawk]

Originally Posted by vh_supra26

https://www.civicxi.com/forum/thread...ok-like.49722/

That is much better than the current version. I might actually drive this one.

[DarkPira7e]

God, I want to put a wing and aftermarket headlights on my car, wrap it in camo, and see how many articles come up about my next model year whatever car they think it is.

With mystery comes collossal power!

[jflogerzi]

Reminds me of a baby version of the new rsx/tsx a-spec which is not a bad thing

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk