follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-02-2014, 08:10 AM   #141
AJPG
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 22RE, FA20, 4G63
Location: PR
Posts: 261
Thanks: 76
Thanked 66 Times in 53 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Maybe and just maybe some people on this forum are on a low "octane" diet and their brain is pulling timing!
AJPG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AJPG For This Useful Post:
Imrac (09-04-2014), wparsons (09-02-2014)
Old 09-02-2014, 08:45 AM   #142
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
You're kidding right? I have 4 stations within 2km's of home that have 93 or 94 octane. Three petros and one esso. Both are only 2-3 cents more per liter than 91 octane at the same station.

Before you claim London has fewer stations with 94, this is all the petro stations in the London area that have 94.

http://www.petro-canada.ca/en/locati...PC=+&R=50&B=UL
GEEEZ take it easy there big fella! I will clarify if it makes you feel better. None of the stations I USE have it. Have only put Esso 91 in since got the car. Still no crickets, smooth idle and runs like a dream so not going to mess with that!
If I start racing will go looking for 94 but until then 91 does me just fine.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 09:45 AM   #143
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Run a few tanks of 94 through it and you'll notice the difference. I would bet that you're getting enough knock on 91 to drop the multiplier (even on the stock tune) to the point where you're losing a noticeable amount of power.

I ran Shell 91 for commuting and Petro 94 for lapping/autox until I started really looking at the logs on 91 (stock tune or modified tune) and saw just how much midrange part throttle knock I was getting. My multiplier was down at 0.5 all the time. Now with Petro 94 on a 93 octane tune I have no knock and the multiplier stays at 1.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wparsons For This Useful Post:
Tcoat (09-02-2014)
Old 09-02-2014, 10:13 AM   #144
drewbot
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S A/T
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 1,996
Thanks: 1,985
Thanked 1,452 Times in 752 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
Run a few tanks of 94 through it and you'll notice the difference. I would bet that you're getting enough knock on 91 to drop the multiplier (even on the stock tune) to the point where you're losing a noticeable amount of power.

I ran Shell 91 for commuting and Petro 94 for lapping/autox until I started really looking at the logs on 91 (stock tune or modified tune) and saw just how much midrange part throttle knock I was getting. My multiplier was down at 0.5 all the time. Now with Petro 94 on a 93 octane tune I have no knock and the multiplier stays at 1.
What's sad is that the difference in price between 91 and 94 is 15 cents/L for me. That Costco has discount is too good. I wonder if adding some additive can still be more cost effective than Petro 94.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
drewbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 11:01 AM   #145
HunterGreene
Hail Magnet
 
HunterGreene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Firestorm FR-S: "Artemis"
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,578
Thanks: 3,386
Thanked 3,195 Times in 1,633 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rs999 View Post
Yes but on a stock 86 nothing will be damaged if you run lower octane even if you race, autox, or drive aggressively.

Also, the lower performance is very subjective, 99% of the drivers (both forum and regulars) wouldn't know the difference if the car was filled with 87 vs 91/93.

As I stated above you only feel and require higher octane once you are tuned, otherwise it really is optional.
Provide your evidence, please. Your sentiments are almost entirely opposite of anything else I have seen or read so far.

And the language in the manual would have read "93 octane *recommended*" instead of *required* if our cars were ok to run on 87.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jawn View Post
It's a bad photoshop. My body is a temple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
It has priests in it?
HunterGreene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 12:11 PM   #146
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by HunterGreene View Post
Provide your evidence, please. Your sentiments are almost entirely opposite of anything else I have seen or read so far.

And the language in the manual would have read "93 octane *recommended*" instead of *required* if our cars were ok to run on 87.
The stock ECU is very good at saving the engine. You won't get catastrophic knock events, and the ECU will pull back all kinds of timing to save things.

It will run poorly and be very down on power, but it won't explode.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 12:12 PM   #147
wparsons
Senior Member
 
wparsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Asphalt FR-S Manual
Location: Whitby, ON, Canada
Posts: 6,716
Thanks: 7,875
Thanked 3,351 Times in 2,134 Posts
Mentioned: 99 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewbot View Post
What's sad is that the difference in price between 91 and 94 is 15 cents/L for me. That Costco has discount is too good. I wonder if adding some additive can still be more cost effective than Petro 94.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I bet as soon as you look at the cost of additives it will be way more expensive. 15c/L is like $6/tank, I think octane booster is more expensive than that.
__________________
Light travels faster than sound, so people may appear to be bright until you hear them speak...
flickr
wparsons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 12:46 PM   #148
HunterGreene
Hail Magnet
 
HunterGreene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Firestorm FR-S: "Artemis"
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 4,578
Thanks: 3,386
Thanked 3,195 Times in 1,633 Posts
Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wparsons View Post
The stock ECU is very good at saving the engine. You won't get catastrophic knock events, and the ECU will pull back all kinds of timing to save things.

It will run poorly and be very down on power, but it won't explode.
I understand that, but I still regard 87 as "emergency use only" fuel.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by jawn View Post
It's a bad photoshop. My body is a temple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tcoat View Post
It has priests in it?
HunterGreene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 04:44 PM   #149
carma143
Senior Member
 
carma143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: Toyota Highlander; Subaru BRZ (SWP)
Location: California
Posts: 431
Thanks: 137
Thanked 156 Times in 95 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drewbot View Post
What's sad is that the difference in price between 91 and 94 is 15 cents/L for me. That Costco has discount is too good. I wonder if adding some additive can still be more cost effective than Petro 94.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
So far I plan to get premium gas from Costco normally, and then once a month get premium from Chevron (with Techron) because it apparently keeps the insides all clean, lubricated, and sparkly :P

Does anybody think this idea is a bad one?
carma143 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 05:32 PM   #150
strat61caster
-
 
strat61caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: '13 FRS - STX
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10,365
Thanks: 13,732
Thanked 9,478 Times in 4,998 Posts
Mentioned: 94 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by carma143 View Post
So far I plan to get premium gas from Costco normally, and then once a month get premium from Chevron (with Techron) because it apparently keeps the insides all clean, lubricated, and sparkly :P

Does anybody think this idea is a bad one?
There is literally thousands of pages of arguing if gasoline additives are of any use, no real consensus.

Nothing wrong with your plan though, personally I'll be surprised if you or any subsequent owners of your car will notice the difference even hundreds of thousands of miles down the road.
strat61caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2014, 05:40 PM   #151
continuecrushing
 
continuecrushing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 Firestorm FRS
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Posts: 2,707
Thanks: 1,231
Thanked 2,144 Times in 1,003 Posts
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
diesel. All the commercials I see advertising diesel vehicles get good mpg, so I don't see why we wouldn't get better mpg on diesel.

And a lot of those commercials are for "turbo-diesel" and we dont have a turbo, so our engine is under less stress, which means diesel is probably just way overkill. Probably equivalent to like 2 or even 300 octane
continuecrushing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to continuecrushing For This Useful Post:
Apoc (09-02-2014), HunterGreene (09-03-2014)
Old 09-02-2014, 09:18 PM   #152
drewbot
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
drewbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Drives: '13 Whiteout FR-S A/T
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 1,996
Thanks: 1,985
Thanked 1,452 Times in 752 Posts
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by carma143 View Post
So far I plan to get premium gas from Costco normally, and then once a month get premium from Chevron (with Techron) because it apparently keeps the insides all clean, lubricated, and sparkly :P

Does anybody think this idea is a bad one?
Gas station additives are like smoke and mirrors.

In Canada at least, the Costco local to my work repeatedly says it buys Shell fuel. But, the additives (not ethanol) are proprietary to Costco - "Kirland" additives
drewbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 12:03 AM   #153
Ubersuber
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: BRZ Pearl White
Location: Cochrane, Alberta Canada
Posts: 314
Thanks: 54
Thanked 71 Times in 50 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
There are very few refineries in Canada. Gasoline is a commodity. You have no way of knowing where the gas in your local service station has been manufactured regardless of posted brand.

Additive packages, however, are proprietary and added to the tankers at the refinery gate. Again, you have no way of knowing for sure what additive package your local gasoline has added although branded gasoline will have that brand's additive package.

At high elevations high octane fuel is unnecessary (94 or 93 is as good as 91 at 1,000 meters) unless your engine is forced induction. You will only notice a slight difference between 91 and 93 at sea level or close to it.
Ubersuber is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ubersuber For This Useful Post:
HyperTech (09-03-2014)
Old 09-03-2014, 09:23 AM   #154
sklimo
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Drives: 2013 Supercharged SSM BRZ Limited
Location: Sportsguy83 butt
Posts: 5,652
Thanks: 16,143
Thanked 12,901 Times in 5,671 Posts
Mentioned: 316 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Wait these aren't two strokes?? FML
sklimo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
uberstupid, use premium!, you can't fix stupid


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Premium gas, or? NotlocTRD Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 151 09-27-2017 02:56 PM
FRS arrival for regular customers question NWIguy Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 20 05-05-2012 08:54 AM
Anyone have a pic of the regular seats? DuMa Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 38 12-14-2011 12:29 AM
So is it a hatch or regular trunk? xantonin Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 5 12-09-2011 07:26 PM
Consequences to Adding Regular Gas? iff2mastamatt Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 36 12-06-2011 12:52 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.