|
Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86 |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
06-15-2011, 10:17 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: 2010 GTI 2dr Tornado Red
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
An inconvenient Truth
This post has nothing to do with that absolute waste of time "movie" which was designed to create a platform for politicians to try and win votes.
It's just the perfect thread title for an issue that I haven't seen much discussion on. I hear about the "spirit" of the car, and all the idol worship of the original AE-86 (which I have not driven), and I think that's good. It means y'all are enthusiasts. However...this car is not going to be that car. It's not going to feel like that car. It's not going to sound like that car. It's not going to HANDLE like that car. It simply isn't going to do any of these things, because every single piece of the car is different technologically and the process for mass production of vehicles, and the materials used in them, has changed dramatically since the AE-86. It's going to weigh many hundreds of pounds more, it's going to have different suspension geometry, different tires sizes, different levels of outward vision, more power, different weight distribution, and it's going to be a modern car. It's going to feel totally different. This is a fact. So, with so many people so enthused about the original car and the feel and spirit of it...how are you going to evaluate this one? How will you decide if it's "got it" ? The car is just going to be so completely different that I don't really know what "metric" people will use to compare it. This thread was not meant to incite a riot or anger anybody...it's just a good topic for discussion since the issue is closely related to why most of you guys are interested in the vehicle in the first place. So....discuss! |
06-15-2011, 10:27 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Ms. Daisy
Location: Dog house
Posts: 645
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Finally something new to discuss.
I'm not stuck on the heritage. Really if I wanted it to be "that" car I would probably just find one somewhere and make it a project car. The FR for me is a step down from the 350Z in terms of raw power but most importantly price. I want a cheaper fun RWD car. I've had great experiences with Toyota products in the past and have tried to purchase a Subie a few times but ended up with a Jeep and 2 350Zs instead. I've always been partial to coupes and am not a huge fan of FWD when it comes to cars, so that narrows the field down pretty well. Unless this thing is a complete dog it will probably be my next purchase. If there's something I just can't live with I'll keep shopping. Looks pretty good so far though.
__________________
BRZ before hoes
|
06-15-2011, 10:40 AM | #3 | ||
Opinionated
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Something Red
Location: Holland
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Just because FoMoCo used the late 60s Mustang as inspiration for the S-197 does not mean they wanted it to handle the same. Same goes for the Miata/S2000 and the British roadsters that inspired them.
__________________
Most of the cars I drive have nets for windows.
|
||
06-15-2011, 10:57 AM | #4 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: 2010 GTI 2dr Tornado Red
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
As for the actual subject....the handling of this car seems to be the sticking point for most people, and I just don't know what they expect...because it's not going to handle anything like the old one. What metric do we measure a subjective feeling by? |
|
06-15-2011, 11:02 AM | #5 |
Opinionated
Join Date: Dec 2009
Drives: Something Red
Location: Holland
Posts: 311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
It is hard to do, but the auto-journalists do this all the time, applying numbers and ratings to subjective criteria. They use the highly tuned "butt-dyno" and the "seat-o-the-pants-accelerometer" to decide which car they like the essence of more.
__________________
Most of the cars I drive have nets for windows.
|
06-15-2011, 11:07 AM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Drives: 2010 GTI 2dr Tornado Red
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 489
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I know. I usually don't agree with their findings though. I've test driven MANY cars. I didn't come to the same conclusions as any of the major rags very often.
|
06-15-2011, 11:19 AM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Drives: BMW 325i (E46)
Location: Michigan
Posts: 258
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Go test drive a Mazda Miata. Modern car, modern production methods. Still lightweight and great 'spirit.' I just don't want a convertible.
|
06-15-2011, 11:50 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: 2009 Hyundai Sonata
Location: FL, US
Posts: 80
Thanks: 4
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I think its more like a new car from Toyota that uses the AE86 as inspiration. Lightweight, modest power, balanced and (hopefully) practical for a 2-door coupe/hatch. I always like to say this car isn't going to be a true successor because a true successor would basically be a rear-drive 2-door 2012 Corolla. I think its going to be more focused than that.
|
06-15-2011, 01:01 PM | #9 |
MODERATOR-SAMA
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,561 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I don't believe we can quantify "spirit" in this sense. Regardless of the mechanics involved.
From my understanding and own experience, the "spirit" that was lost to us for almost 10-20 years revolves around the idea that you can connect physical and emotional self down a long windy road in a vehicle. In the perspective of a Japanese auto maker, down a mountain path or across a long stretch of highway. Having too much technology within our current vehicles that makes driving more easier to us disconnects us from the road. Items like ABS, traction control, auto downshift, auto/manumatic transmissions, Electronic suspension..ect.. The AE86 did have that spirit, even if it was a relatively stupid car. The rx7 did have that spirit even if its rotary was a horrible engine. The Supra did have that spirit even if was a beefy chassis. The Mustang, the corvette, the 240z, the silvia, the E30 BMW, the golf I felt all that that same spirit but moved us in different ways. The cars we drive today vs the cars we drove in the 80s and 90s perform vastly different, not in just technology and design. Yet in a way that that same feeling we got driving down a road has become to comfortable and more about tangle and quantifiable performance. In the direction and inspiration of the AE86 to the FT86, i believe the spirit relies on using the least amount of car to get the best amount of driving pleasure. Which is why 200hp and a lightweight RWD chassis is simple, and uncomplicated and doesn't require a whole lot to get back that similar or simulated feeling. If we focus on mechanics, i believe we begin to become disappointed in the FT86. I know i would. Because then the direction would shift into building a car that was like the AE86. Where we might as well just ask Toyota the revive the old AE86 chassis and put it into production for a 2012 release. This isn't spirit....this is mimicing a cars performance.
__________________
|
06-15-2011, 04:54 PM | #10 |
ft86club resident b-boy
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Yamaha R3, moonslate 2018 GT Black
Location: LA Area So Cal
Posts: 1,214
Thanks: 142
Thanked 208 Times in 101 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
i can't really reply to this thread unless i drive the ft myself and can compare it to an ae86 directly. but to all those here who've driven an ae86, here's a thought: given what we do know about the ft, what are your expectations concerning how the ft will handle compared to the ae?
i have driven an ae in the parking lot but haven't spent enough time with it to really have a good feel for how it drives. but given what we know about the ft it should be a rather different experience. the extra power to push you through a corner should make a world of difference. and having IRS should improve grip in the rear significantly, although i guess there is a certain appeal to having a solid rear axle for old school drift guys. |
06-15-2011, 05:06 PM | #11 |
When In Doubt...
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: Slowww
Location: PA215
Posts: 1,844
Thanks: 1,023
Thanked 752 Times in 412 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm gonna measure the "spirit" of the car based on the way it makes me feel.
If I can wake up in the early morning for work and be excited about it because I have a 40 minute drive ahead of me (on empty winding back roads) in my boxer powered FR coupe, then Toyota/Subaru has nailed the spirit thing right on the head. I think this is the best way I can put it. Second best way: If I'm more upset about a shifter bushing being loose than a scratch on one of the bumpers, then the spirit is there. I've spent too much time in my driving career maintaining the "beauty" of my cars to the point where I'd get so upset about minor blemishes or rock chips. I don't want to worry about that with this car. This car needs to be a machine, not a driveway queen.
__________________
Join the Galaxy Blue Silica BRZ registry below: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&usp=sharing |
06-15-2011, 05:36 PM | #12 |
Feeling Iffy?
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: it like I stole it
Location: DC
Posts: 1,041
Thanks: 31
Thanked 23 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
All of the teenage girls buying this car will be disappointed if there is too much spirit! How can they text and drive then?
|
06-15-2011, 08:10 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Drives: N/A
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,205
Thanked 646 Times in 419 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
POLITICALDISCUSSIONAVERTED!
Quote:
Do not underestimate teenage girls! I can text and drive stick. Now texting, driving stick, drink/eating, and applying makeup? I'm never going to try that . |
|
06-15-2011, 08:19 PM | #14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Drives: '96 beater Corolla
Location: Cali
Posts: 409
Thanks: 7
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Spirit isn't defined by numerical specs, whether it uses double-wishbone, multi-link or mac struts. Or power output. A car doesn't all of a sudden have "spirit" when it weights under 2600 lbs. Nor does it have spirit by virtue of being fast. Spirit is defined by the focus of the car. With the AE86, that spirit is it being lightweight, FR, and emphasizing balanced dynamics over brute power. Those are all abstractions, not solid numerical values. In 2011, "light weight" means a car around 2800 lbs and under. Those numerical interpretations of the abstract principles change over time, but not the principle itself. |
|
|
|
|
|