Kodename47's Tuning Tools

[Kodename47]

That would be my understanding, yes.

[Tor]

Originally Posted by Kodename47

That would be my understanding, yes.

Thank you. How do you go about getting it started? E.g. I see you put 30 as the first CAL value and chose 0.9 in Exp Base. Can you explain what you are looking for when picking those numbers? And do you settle on Exp Base from the start or are you revising it as you go along? Thanks a lot for your help!

[Kodename47]

Originally Posted by Tor

Thank you. How do you go about getting it started? E.g. I see you put 30 as the first CAL value and chose 0.9 in Exp Base. Can you explain what you are looking for when picking those numbers? And do you settle on Exp Base from the start or are you revising it as you go along? Thanks a lot for your help!

Trial and error. I try and put a value in the 1st box that works well and then the base I use to try and get the right shape and then go from there. Changing those 2 values will impact on each other so you might just need to have a play. I have just found that 0.9 works quite well on my MAF, however I had another play the other day and it seems that 0.5-0.9 is the ideal range for our scales.

[Tor]

Thanks a lot again.
I flashed your values and here are some the results. Full throttle from 1200 rpm in 3rd gear:
http://www.datazap.me/u/tor/tor-218-...zoom=8955-9105


Above at IAT 20 down to 15 C. And after about 60 km driving.

Here earlier at IAT 30 down to 25. And after mayby 30 km:
http://www.datazap.me/u/tor/tor-218-...om=11873-12006



Stock A01G IAT compensation was reenabled in the above logs.

My reason for doing this was that my LTFT kept changing. One day +2.5, the next day -1. Lowering the OL timers didn't help. And setting them at 0 felt horrible.

My previous MAF was scaled at fairly low temperatures and without disabling the IAT compensation. Could the swings have been caused by IAT compensation influencing the scaling and subsequently messing up the trims when driving at different temperatures?

In any case, the engine seems to like it and it must be the flattest AFR curve I have had so far. It might be placebo and wanting to feel a difference, but it certainly pulls very smooth now.

Now waiting in anticipation what the LTFT are going to do. Hopefully, they will stick around 0 and remain stabile. Last pull I did on the way home had -0.05 LTFT.

[Tor]

I'm looking for your AVCS tool, but can't find it. Did I miss it being incoporated in one of your other tools?

[steve99]

Originally Posted by Tor

I'm looking for your AVCS tool, but can't find it. Did I miss it being incoporated in one of your other tools?

I think its incorporated in maf scaling tool, if you get latest VGI version on romraider

[Kodename47]

Originally Posted by Tor

I'm looking for your AVCS tool, but can't find it. Did I miss it being incoporated in one of your other tools?

Added to the 1st post.

[Tor]

Originally Posted by steve99

I think its incorporated in maf scaling tool, if you get latest VGI version on romraider

Kodename47 also made an excel sheet that visualizes the lobes. It doesn't help adjusting but shows where the cam are actually according to the tables.

I was just curious where my cams are according to the useful information from @arghx7 on nasioc.

Originally Posted by Kodename47

Added to the 1st post.

Thanks. That was the one.

[Tor]

Originally Posted by Tor

Kodename47 also made an excel sheet that visualizes the lobes. It doesn't help adjusting but shows where the cam are actually according to the tables.

Having now used this tool for some hours, I think I have to revise that statement!

I think this can indeed be extremely helpful to blend in the adjustment from Vgi's too into the rest of the table. I'll post later how I use it in the AVCS thread I started.