08-31-2021, 09:38 AM | #15 |
Pavement Grey
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: 2020 Toyota 86 GT, 2017 BMW X1
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,084
Thanks: 109
Thanked 2,223 Times in 1,205 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Hmm the dip is supposed to be alot more flat...wonder whats going on here?
This would also indicate to me that the dip wasnt "fixed" per se, but rather the car feels better because it makes a healthy 30lb/ft more torque than the outgoing car overall. So the gen1 dip produces something like 120lb/ft and the gen2 dip is like 150lb/ft. And we know the gen1 car pulls pretty good with 150ish lb/ft at its peak (basically anywhere outside the dip) |
08-31-2021, 09:45 AM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: VW GLI 6MT
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 110
Thanks: 61
Thanked 88 Times in 41 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Isn’t the engine supposed to reach peak torque at 3,700 rpm? If yes, why did this one peak at 3,200 rpm? Is that significant enough to question these numbers?
|
08-31-2021, 09:55 AM | #17 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Drives: TBD
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,583
Thanks: 665
Thanked 685 Times in 386 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-31-2021, 12:14 PM | #18 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 934
Thanks: 676
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PulsarBeeerz For This Useful Post: | Stonehorsw (08-31-2021), timurrrr (08-31-2021) |
08-31-2021, 12:19 PM | #19 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited with PP
Location: Phildalphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 975
Thanks: 2,123
Thanked 609 Times in 391 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Not sure why the surprises are here. I guess the only surprise is that the torque dip looks bigger than they advertised, but it was still there.
In general the curve looks quite similar to gen1: https://www.ft86club.com/forums/showthread.php?t=88696 You can see the big difference is that the dip has been shortened by a good bit, as it starts later (at least if you don't count the initial torque spike for a very brief time, and look at the torque curve as a flat line where most of it lies throughout the revs). I also don't think you'll really be feeling this dip like many did in the first gen. You have to remember that in the first gen, the point in the dip simply felt flat in terms of acceleration. It didn't give you that peppy feeling in that range. The gen2 curve is well above all of this range, and even at the dip, the torque is well above the highest point of gen1 torque, so there is ALWAYS going to be that peppy feeling. |
08-31-2021, 12:23 PM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Drives: '23 BRZ
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 4,584
Thanks: 1,377
Thanked 3,891 Times in 2,032 Posts
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I have to wonder if they might have had to reoptimize cam phasing to meet noise requirements?
Forrealz a bit disappointed if these are the real power/torque curves vs. what's been shown on the "info screen" graphic! Just a bit though. +20% displacement and same revs is still gonna give nice gains... |
08-31-2021, 01:37 PM | #21 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 615
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 478 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Also, the aftermarket will have solutions for this pretty quick would be my guess, just like that thread you linked. I hope CSG is as involved with the new car as they were with the first gen.
__________________
2013 FRS -> 2011 CTS-V -> 2006 Cayman S -> 2015 GTI -> 2022 BRZ
|
|||
The Following User Says Thank You to Pete For This Useful Post: | stilesg57 (08-31-2021) |
08-31-2021, 01:46 PM | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Drives: 2018 Subaru BRZ Limited with PP
Location: Phildalphia, Pennsylvania
Posts: 975
Thanks: 2,123
Thanked 609 Times in 391 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Purely my speculation, so we'll see. But what I'm basically trying to say is that the curves might still look much better on a more typical dyno like a Dynojet that we're used to seeing, and have a smaller torque dip. EDIT: Also, it might answer the question for some of you who are wondering why the peaks are at different points than what is advertised. The DynaPack doesn't average out the values like some other dyno's, as I already mentioned, so you're seeing more accurate results in what the output is truly like. This is the case for many vehicles out there, we're just all so used to seeing smooth or nice curves, but that is never really the case. Also, I could be incorrect on this, but aren't peak values read at the engine, and not at the wheels, from the manufacturer? Hence why there may be such a difference in where the peaks lie as well? |
|
08-31-2021, 01:50 PM | #23 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: '22 WRB
Location: US
Posts: 854
Thanks: 201
Thanked 1,213 Times in 400 Posts
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I will say that butt dyno and driving experience is MUCH improved. Initial thought was "this feels very much, maybe even slightly better, like my first gen car with a nice EL header and tune". So remember that the major complaint on the first gen was more about how it feels to drive, and regardless of what this video of this dyno shows, seems like everyone is in agreement that the new car feels much better.
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to trippinbillies40 For This Useful Post: |
08-31-2021, 09:28 PM | #24 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2020
Drives: 18 Brz (Sold) / 22 BRZ
Location: Michigan
Posts: 647
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 439 Times in 256 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
09-01-2021, 01:29 AM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: WR Blue Pearl 2022 Subaru BRZ
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 818
Thanks: 790
Thanked 517 Times in 274 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
So it begins!
Very excited. Hub numbers seem a little higher than I was expecting - I run my 2012 (MT) on those and got 150hp. But perhaps that was just the Australian correction factor hehe. |
09-01-2021, 02:32 AM | #26 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Drives: honda element
Location: tampa
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
what is the possibility as load comes on the car is running lean and pulling back timing (ie maybe the car hasnt fully learned its fuel trims yet)?
|
09-01-2021, 02:45 AM | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Drives: JRSC BRZ SOLD
Location: Ohio
Posts: 934
Thanks: 676
Thanked 739 Times in 396 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Not very as there are two examples dyno videos and multiple runs. Plus oem tunes are way more likely to run rich and safe than lean. |
|
09-01-2021, 05:14 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: GT86, 22 BRZ
Location: Sydney
Posts: 79
Thanks: 24
Thanked 80 Times in 23 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm excited to see this torque dip. It tells me the car is still choked by the headers for emission reasons and that some catless headers + tune should make healthy gains just like the first gen.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to drift86 For This Useful Post: | FlyingJett (09-01-2021) |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Typical Mustang Dyno Numbers? | Rockz222 | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 6 | 07-11-2015 08:33 PM |
Dyno numbers | ogrowup | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 7 | 12-27-2014 08:04 AM |
Average Stock Dyno Numbers? | KONVERTER | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 23 | 10-12-2013 10:13 PM |
Dyno numbers list from Evasive Motorsports Meet/Dyno | Fish | Southern California | 29 | 02-24-2013 03:16 AM |
dyno numbers seem low | stealth_fighter | Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum | 9 | 02-02-2013 09:01 PM |