|
Tracking / Autocross / HPDE / Drifting What these cars were built for! |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
11-21-2012, 07:13 AM | #1 |
Trim the Fat & add Boost
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: sometimes I fly
Location: Earth
Posts: 180
Thanks: 48
Thanked 127 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Bumper Beam Delete?
So the track only 86 is going on another diet and I'm wondering if removing the bumper beams would compromise the frames structural integrity on this model... mainly up front.
I have seen bumper beam replacement braces from Beatrush but don't really want those or any other except for strut tower and suspension. And does anyone know the weight of the stock beams? Thanks in advance Updated thanks to @Anthony Front bumper beam weight: 15 lbs. Rear bumper beam weight: 12.4 lbs. Last edited by Anorexic 86; 08-30-2014 at 07:49 AM. |
11-21-2012, 09:12 AM | #2 |
i'm sorry, what?
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Canada
Location: I rock a beat harder than you can beat it with rocks
Posts: 4,399
Thanks: 357
Thanked 2,506 Times in 1,268 Posts
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 3 Thread(s)
|
yeah i'd like to know too
my old 01 Impeza had steel beams at 25 lb each (front and back) that could be replaced with japanese aluminium pieces at like 6lb each. if you're going to do track only you can get rid of the whole thing and just weld a hollow pipe between the two beams to maintain rigidity just keep in mind your car will become much more susceptible to frontal damage in the event of a crash, how confident are you that you will never hit anything head on?
__________________
don't you think if I was wrong, I'd know it?
|
11-21-2012, 09:38 AM | #3 |
AIM4APX
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 WRB BRZ Limited
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,206
Thanks: 642
Thanked 749 Times in 324 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I can't speak for Subarus but I know that with my track Hondas removing the front beam was always like removing a front sway bar. It reduced understeer and made turn in a lot sharper, but also made the car more loose up front in esses.
The intention of these are to distribute the frontal forces in a crash to the rest of the frame and are usually an integral part of the front structure. I can only imagine that removing it will result in a change in the way the car reacts. I will say that the JDM front rebar pieces were always thinner and lighter due to their less stringent crash testing, so using that as a replacement was always a good choice to loose some weight. Not sure if that is an option for us or not?
__________________
"It's very difficult to present technology as an overtly positive sales device to people who want an emotional car" -Chris Harris
|
11-21-2012, 10:07 AM | #4 |
Trim the Fat & add Boost
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: sometimes I fly
Location: Earth
Posts: 180
Thanks: 48
Thanked 127 Times in 59 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
My only other experience deleting a front bumper beam was on a 2005 STI.
It shaved 30 lbs. off the nose of the car... Then I deleted the huge U crash-brace under the engine which didn't even come on the Spec. C version in Japan. That was another 30 lbs. of dead weight off the front of the car. Then 20 lbs. were cut with a lightweight battery So in total, 80 lbs. were removed off the front end and it transformed that STI from a dull box cutter into a weaponized X-acto blade. Never did I find any cracks or broken spot welds after the deletes... even after heavy track abuse for 7 years. Thanks Fuji Heavy for the memories! Last edited by Anorexic 86; 08-30-2014 at 08:38 AM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Anorexic 86 For This Useful Post: | SuperTom (01-19-2020) |
08-26-2014, 02:12 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Resurrecting this from the dead to see if there is new insight into the crash being integral to structural rigidity of the frame.
|
08-26-2014, 03:44 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Drives: 13' Scion FRS Track car
Location: miami
Posts: 417
Thanks: 76
Thanked 107 Times in 84 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
I assume you could remove it without problem
But if you have any front impact the your frame will certainly be toast right away without that important part which absorb crash energy. |
08-29-2014, 12:31 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 2013 DGM Subaru BRZ (Subie #9)
Location: ATL, US
Posts: 2,667
Thanks: 123
Thanked 860 Times in 552 Posts
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm sure it adds some tiny bit of rigidity but I can't see it being all that much. The frame in those areas is already fairly rigid.
As for the frame being toast, there is no frame behind the beam except on the sides where it attaches. There is stuff like the radiator core support, etc. but those aren't really part of the frame. If you took an angular impact where you hit where the beam attached to the frame, the frame would likely be shot anyways with or without the front crash beam. |
The Following User Says Thank You to xwd For This Useful Post: | sw20kosh (08-29-2014) |
08-29-2014, 04:31 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Going to see if this solves the 230+ coolant temps. I am being told that heads lift at temps that high...
|
08-29-2014, 07:43 PM | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: Norcal
Posts: 1,592
Thanks: 1
Thanked 623 Times in 378 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'm running the Drift Armor drift bar on my BRZ. Loving it so far, it lets a lot more air in through the front, especially with my intercooler covering basically the entire front grill opening.
I also cut holes in the solid plastic "mouthpiece" that also helps let more air in. The stock crash beam is directly behind the mouthpiece, so cutting the holes and going with the drift bar actually added a lot of opening area. |
08-29-2014, 09:42 PM | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2013 Black FR-S
Location: SF
Posts: 3,030
Thanks: 881
Thanked 2,014 Times in 990 Posts
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
08-29-2014, 09:58 PM | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: '13 BRZ
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Fwiw, I think I remember reading a post from Robispec that they removed both F & R beams and found zero difference in frame flex.
|
08-29-2014, 10:33 PM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: Sterling BRZ Ltd
Location: New England
Posts: 1,702
Thanks: 403
Thanked 1,389 Times in 671 Posts
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
|
Given how the beam attaches (small bolts on one plane) I don't believe it has any effect on torsional strength. Sure looks like it meant for what you would think, frontal crashing.
Rigidity or not I'd like to have at least something in front.
__________________
|
08-29-2014, 11:51 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Drives: many
Location: here
Posts: 487
Thanks: 190
Thanked 279 Times in 152 Posts
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
|
08-30-2014, 01:20 AM | #14 |
The Angry Brit
Join Date: May 2013
Drives: 1991 E30 318iS
Location: NM
Posts: 424
Thanks: 148
Thanked 361 Times in 155 Posts
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I mean if you hit something hard enough, cage bucket and harness or not, I hope your legs like eating fa20 for dinner... I'd at least have something up there.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Trading BRZ bumper for FRS bumper WHITE | just86 | Exterior Parts (Aero, Lighting, Etc.) | 7 | 12-09-2012 02:08 PM |
Muffler delete getting rear bumper really hot | ML | Engine, Exhaust, Transmission | 22 | 11-22-2012 10:10 AM |
Low beam on indicator? | percyng | CANADA | 5 | 10-10-2012 04:47 PM |