Visconti Tuning - Latest BRZ Flash Info

[Visconti]

Originally Posted by Sportsguy83

Ironic as it may sound (and I'm serious), there is a big chance I get one of your FF kits , only thing is I'll be getting custom fuel lines made.

Welcome back.

I'm working on a much better kit.. different everything - except the tuning.

If your actually interested in doing something I wouldn't have a problem working with you again

John

[mikalem]

Originally Posted by Sportsguy83

Ironic as it may sound (and I'm serious), there is a big chance I get one of your FF kits , only thing is I'll be getting custom fuel lines made.

Welcome back.

Once the fuel line issue was resolved I've had no problems with the hardware I got from john. A little more work than I would have liked, but its the price you pay jumping in early.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

[SmsAlSuwaidi]

Originally Posted by Visconti

I'm working on a much better kit.. different everything - except the tuning.

If your actually interested in doing something I wouldn't have a problem working with you again

John

By different everything do you mean a different sensor / hardware ? Maybe the new zetronix line ?


Sent from my IBrick

[Visconti]

Originally Posted by SmsAlSuwaidi

By different everything do you mean a different sensor / hardware ? Maybe the new zetronix line ?


Sent from my IBrick

Except the sensor

[s2d4]

Originally Posted by Visconti

Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong but I'm pretty sure the IAM is setup to not be able to move on the stock tune - which might explain why it doesn't move at all on another vendors tune.

I could be wrong too but this actually goes against the subaru knock control strategy documentation I've read thus far. It either doesn't move at all because there is no knock or it has been intentionally bypassed?

@mad_sb @jamesm @Td-d @vgi

[Visconti]

Originally Posted by s2d4

I could be wrong too but this actually goes against the subaru knock control strategy documentation I've read thus far. It either doesn't move at all because there is no knock or it has been intentionally bypassed?

@mad_sb @jamesm @Td-d @vgi

I'll have to double check with the dev guys at EcuTek but I'm under the impression that the IAM can't go up or down if the 'increment amount' is @ 0

https://www.dropbox.com/s/14q9dardy5...Multiplier.png

[jamesm]

that's not correct. i found that to behave weirdly in my experimentation with it though. even with the increment amount set at 0 (as stock) the iam can definitely go up and down. changing it does effect the step size though.

the easy way to disable the iam is to ensure that the current applied advance value is never greater than 3.9 degrees, as this is one of the conditions to entering rough correction mode. of course this can be accomplished by stuffing timing in the base map and reducing values in the advance map to achieve the same total timing.

it is widely accepted that this is a bad idea, at least from what i've read.

[Visconti]

btw

I will have a tune update available Friday for all roms.

Originally Posted by jamesm

that's not correct. i found that to be weird in my experimentation with it though. even with the increment amount set at 0 (as stock) the iam can definitely go up and down. changing it does effect the step size though.

I'm going to try and confirm that with the EcuTek guys..

How much did you see the IAM changing with the default values?

[jamesm]

Originally Posted by Visconti

btw

I will have a tune update available Friday for all roms.



I'm going to try and confirm that with the EcuTek guys..

How much did you see the IAM changing with the default values?

in increments as low as 0.02 was the smallest i've seen. it could actually be smaller and be stepping through the other values without me seeing it though, as i don't poll the iam often.

[CBR600RR]

Originally Posted by Visconti

And I'm back.. will be responding to posts / questions shortly

John

Glad to see you back John!

[cuddefred]

+ 1

Originally Posted by CBR600RR

Glad to see you back John!

[cuddefred]

John, with the new stuff approach from Ecutek is there any chance that we will get to see the ECU remembering the last map we used. This would be really good if it could be done.

Glad to see you back on here and just remember to try and play nice with the others cos some of us miss you

[EcuTek]

Originally Posted by cuddefred

John, with the new stuff approach from Ecutek is there any chance that we will get to see the ECU remembering the last map we used. This would be really good if it could be done.

Glad to see you back on here and just remember to try and play nice with the others cos some of us miss you

We have had a lot of comments on this and it is noted. It will be looked at going forward as we are very clear it is a popular request.

And yes John. Please play nice!

[Visconti]

Originally Posted by cuddefred

John, with the new stuff approach from Ecutek is there any chance that we will get to see the ECU remembering the last map we used. This would be really good if it could be done.

Glad to see you back on here and just remember to try and play nice with the others cos some of us miss you

Thanks!

Phil at EcuTek said there's a few more things he wants to try out in regards to the map switching. It's been a while since he's looked at it but we both agreed that a fresh look at the problem is all that's really needed, he's pretty sure he'll get it sorted.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk