follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-17-2019, 02:26 PM   #15
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
I've always put it down to the lack of input into the rear O2, so only fixed with custom maps for cruising AFRs. It will still do this when dropping out of the custom map parameters though.
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2019, 06:24 PM   #16
504
Senior Member
 
504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kodename47 View Post
I've always put it down to the lack of input into the rear O2, so only fixed with custom maps for cruising AFRs. It will still do this when dropping out of the custom map parameters though.
Makes sense, only really started happening under E5 ethanol reading, I wonder if a min voltage could be applied to maintain a minimum E reading to avoid such issue?
504 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2019, 06:28 PM   #17
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
it can't be lack of o2 sensor, at least phisically, because i always had that even with rear o2 plugged in, but disabled in tune
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 07:47 AM   #18
504
Senior Member
 
504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
may have resolved this fellas but no way to test until I visit my tuner again, basically need to be certain before I do that

see attachment below, set BOTH these tables to ZERO to remove all impact rear o2 may have on closed loop fuelling. Essentially, with flex fuel tuning, the Rear o2 will read a very low voltage on E0, and this appears to trigger a rich response

If anyone having similar issue could test this and provide feedback here, that would be greatly appreciated @!
Attached Images
 
504 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2019, 08:23 AM   #19
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
we already did that, it s a normal thing to do when you remove rear sensor, it doesnt fix the 13.8ish afr when you return to throttle
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 05:13 AM   #20
504
Senior Member
 
504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
we already did that, it s a normal thing to do when you remove rear sensor, it doesnt fix the 13.8ish afr when you return to throttle
so is there really zero solution at all to this issue?

really dont want to be running 10% rich now that eflex is not available .....

in that instance, how about forcing a minimum voltage through the flex sensor to the point the issue is alleviated?

Edit: your last comment is contrary to your earlier mention of no rich issue without rear o2?

Last edited by 504; 07-04-2019 at 06:37 AM.
504 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 06:14 AM   #21
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 504 View Post
so is there really zero solution at all to this issue?

really dont want to be running 10% rich now that eflex is not available .....

in that instance, how about forcing a minimum voltage through the flex sensor to the point the issue is alleviated?

I have rear 02 connect flex kit with AF#3 correctins zeroed, fueling is fine on petrol and e85.


Check fhe ethabol sensor scaling and fueling​ compensation tables. I also keep ltft active in open loop.


Is your fuelong problem in open loop only
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 06:43 AM   #22
504
Senior Member
 
504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
I have rear 02 connect flex kit with AF#3 correctins zeroed, fueling is fine on petrol and e85.


Check fhe ethabol sensor scaling and fueling​ compensation tables. I also keep ltft active in open loop.


Is your fuelong problem in open loop only

I dont have tune access, but am very confident fuel comp tables are dead zero (i.e. stoich) at everything below 0.6 load. perhaps an issue of setting 0.000 rather than -0.029? seems unlikely

I cant check fuel status but both STFT and LTFT is active so seems closed loop. Effectively after every shift it commands 13.8, then after 30 seconds commands 14.1, then 10 seconds later 14.3, 14.5 and if no shift, 14.7. if shifted, it goes back to 13.8 strictly and process repeats. this happens under very light load, fuel economy style driving

I have been running e70 for basically the life of the car and hadnt tested 98 till recent. 14.7 commanded was a non issue till flex sensor started reading below e10 so kind of pinned it down to rear o2 sensor voltage.

Those two tables I pictured above seem to be the culprit, I do only have one shot to get it right though with tuner being so far
504 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 504 For This Useful Post:
tomm.brz (07-04-2019)
Old 07-04-2019, 06:55 AM   #23
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
I have rear 02 connect flex kit with AF#3 correctins zeroed, fueling is fine on petrol and e85.


Check fhe ethabol sensor scaling and fueling​ compensation tables. I also keep ltft active in open loop.


Is your fuelong problem in open loop only
Steve i think it s just the problem that kodename noticed time ago, during closed loop when you go back to throttle.. i always notice it when Rear o2 is disabled in tune and noticed the most on 2015-2016 euro cars with F10G rom
with my K00G i notice too but less often and for shorter time
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 07:54 AM   #24
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,987 Times in 2,981 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomm.brz View Post
Steve i think it s just the problem that kodename noticed time ago, during closed loop when you go back to throttle.. i always notice it when Rear o2 is disabled in tune and noticed the most on 2015-2016 euro cars with F10G rom
with my K00G i notice too but less often and for shorter time

So your saying if i cruise along on closed loop then accelerate i will get rich afr of 13 for quite aome time, is tgis in closed or open loop the rich running ?, I do quite a bit of logging on highways cannpt say ive noticed this
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 09:56 AM   #25
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I thought kodename showed you many times this behavior,
for example i'm tuning a F10G brz, that has rear 02 disabled:


https://datazap.me/u/tommbrz/boxer-v...-4-5-15&solo=2


look at Afr target
it's actually 14.7 both in open loop fuel target table and closed loop target but it's targeting 13.82 when on throttle and closed loop



f10g calibrations are the worst, at least in my experience, d00g a bit better, a02g much better and just do this sometimes, and for shorter time
k00g also do it sometimes, not often


never understood what triggers this and how to fix

kodename fixed it forcing open loop all the time, and he created a custom closed loop fuel control with custom maps,

i just keep it like that and force-lean offsetting lambda sensor scaling to have a leaner real afr, but i also have a wideband sensor always plugged in
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 05:03 PM   #26
Kodename47
Senior Member
 
Kodename47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Drives: UK GT86
Location: UK
Posts: 3,040
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,629 Times in 1,112 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve99 View Post
So your saying if i cruise along on closed loop then accelerate i will get rich afr of 13 for quite aome time, is tgis in closed or open loop the rich running ?, I do quite a bit of logging on highways cannpt say ive noticed this

Yellow is CL target
Red is AFR
__________________
.: Stealth 86 :.
Abbey Motorsport/K47 Tuned Sprintex 210 Supercharger

Kodename 47 DJ:
Soundcloud / Instagram / Facebook
Kodename47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 08:17 PM   #27
tomm.brz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Drives: brz 2017 hksv2
Location: italy
Posts: 2,192
Thanks: 500
Thanked 1,064 Times in 773 Posts
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
... that stupid 13.82 afr... i gave up trying understand it, think is some undefined tables/logic acting this way

which calid do u use kodename?
tomm.brz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2019, 08:37 PM   #28
504
Senior Member
 
504's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Drives: 2014 86 GTS
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 168
Thanks: 131
Thanked 85 Times in 57 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Its very interesting that this issue is resolved with subaru wrx's through the above tables, but potentially not with 32bit ECUs?

We do know that a low voltage reading to the rear o2 will tell the car its supposedly in a lean condition, therefore adding a dummy 0.3v minimum input may resolve the issue entirely. Not sure how to go about doing that
504 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BRZedit Fuel Trims, Closed to Open loop transiton mad_sb Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 32 08-06-2015 03:14 AM
Closed Project Kick Revo Lug Nuts (closed) ARP Extended Lugs Sportsguy83 Wheels | Tires | Spacers | Hub -- Sponsored by The Tire Rack 6 02-25-2014 10:46 AM
Screencast: closed loop boost control with RaceRom jamesm Software Tuning 2 02-10-2014 02:23 PM
Screencast: experimenting with full-time closed loop fueling jamesm Software Tuning 2 12-27-2013 10:19 AM
i've been out of the loop! VenomRush Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS] 0 02-15-2013 11:25 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.