follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum

Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum The place to start for the Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 | GT86


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2019, 04:29 PM   #29
Sapphireho
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Sapphireho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: '15 ultramarine
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,192
Thanks: 5,451
Thanked 18,239 Times in 8,609 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by finch1750 View Post
Figuring 30mpg to be nice it's a savings of $600-650 based on the normal $0.20 savings from premium to 87

Well, what if he drives downhill to work, both ways?
Sapphireho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 04:52 PM   #30
XPLSV
Member
 
XPLSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S RS1.0
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 26
Thanks: 4
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Why non ethanol?


Non-ethanol gas has anywhere from 15-20% more energy than typical ethanol gas. This is completely separate from the Octane ratings. The Octane ratings is more closely related to the ignition timing and running too low an Octane will result in the engine knocking. Where I live at 7000 foot elevation in Colorado, the lower oxygen content in the atmosphere allows for lower Octane without getting the engine knocking...so typical regular gas is 85 rather than 87, premium is 91 vs 93. Modern vehicles are designed for the crappy ethanol gasoline, so there won't be damage to them and you may not see much change in performance. I've only put premium in my recently acquired FR-S, so I couldn't tell you anything about my experience with running it on regular Octane gasoline. I do have a 2010 Goldwing and my gas mileage on that is a minimum of 20% better when running it on non-ethanol gas at the same Octane. I also have a 2017 Power Wagon and haven't noticed any difference between 91 Octane ethanol gasoline and 87 Octane non-ethanol gasoline--the price is about the same here between the two.


An additional effect of driving at 7000 feet is a roughly 20% loss of horsepower for a naturally aspirated engine. A turbocharger does better at altitude than a supercharger, but it is what it is.


Two cycle yard equipment really prefers non-ethanol gasoline.
XPLSV is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to XPLSV For This Useful Post:
Koa (02-01-2019)
Old 01-31-2019, 04:53 PM   #31
PetrolioBenzina
Senior Member
 
PetrolioBenzina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 17 86
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Thanks: 75
Thanked 1,133 Times in 647 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Borchert97 View Post
Huh, it was my understanding that most high compression engines could run on 105 octane race fuel no problem. Am I perhaps thinking of a non-ethanol 105 octane?
Correct. To run E85 you need a specific ethanol tune. The downside is 14MPG.
PetrolioBenzina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 04:58 PM   #32
Tokay444
Anti stance.
 
Tokay444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Drives: 17 White 860. RCE Tarmac 2. RE-71RS
Location: Not Canada
Posts: 1,629
Thanks: 897
Thanked 956 Times in 546 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by XPLSV View Post
Non-ethanol gas has anywhere from 15-20% more energy than typical ethanol gas. This is completely separate from the Octane ratings. The Octane ratings is more closely related to the ignition timing and running too low an Octane will result in the engine knocking. Where I live at 7000 foot elevation in Colorado, the lower oxygen content in the atmosphere allows for lower Octane without getting the engine knocking...so typical regular gas is 85 rather than 87, premium is 91 vs 93. Modern vehicles are designed for the crappy ethanol gasoline, so there won't be damage to them and you may not see much change in performance. I've only put premium in my recently acquired FR-S, so I couldn't tell you anything about my experience with running it on regular Octane gasoline. I do have a 2010 Goldwing and my gas mileage on that is a minimum of 20% better when running it on non-ethanol gas at the same Octane. I also have a 2017 Power Wagon and haven't noticed any difference between 91 Octane ethanol gasoline and 87 Octane non-ethanol gasoline--the price is about the same here between the two.


An additional effect of driving at 7000 feet is a roughly 20% loss of horsepower for a naturally aspirated engine. A turbocharger does better at altitude than a supercharger, but it is what it is.


Two cycle yard equipment really prefers non-ethanol gasoline.
Ethanol though, has an effective octane rating of 160, and Methanol 180 through a DI system.
It has a very high latent heat of evaporation, and the benefits of running it far outweigh loss of energy. So much so that you will pass MBT before you start knocking on E85. If you can tune for it, it's great.
Your two stroke yard equipment is assembled with seals that don't stand up to the dryness of the alcohols. That's all.
Tokay444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:04 PM   #33
TooSlow
Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Drives: Toyota
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 48
Thanks: 10
Thanked 27 Times in 16 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
91 in CA all the time.
TooSlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:12 PM   #34
Sapphireho
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Sapphireho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: '15 ultramarine
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,192
Thanks: 5,451
Thanked 18,239 Times in 8,609 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PetrolioBenzina View Post
Correct. To run E85 you need a specific ethanol tune. The downside is 14MPG.

Is that boosted?
Sapphireho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:19 PM   #35
Silverz
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Drives: Black frs
Location: LA
Posts: 103
Thanks: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 20 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I guess it’s kind of an experiment. I’ve had premium gas cars for the last 20 years as my personal vehicle. I keep daily drivers for a while. My last car I had for 13 years before I traded it in. I used 87 in it for the last 6 years without issue before trading it in.

Not sure where you live where it’s only 0.20 difference between premium and 87. It’s between 0.60 to 0.80 per gallon difference where I live.
Silverz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:19 PM   #36
PetrolioBenzina
Senior Member
 
PetrolioBenzina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Drives: 17 86
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,671
Thanks: 75
Thanked 1,133 Times in 647 Posts
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapphireho View Post
Is that boosted?
No. I may be an agressive driver, since the front of the 17 is so aggressive. I think it was you who said you should drive either hard on the gas or hard on the brakes. Its more fun that way!
PetrolioBenzina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:21 PM   #37
Sapphireho
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Sapphireho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: '15 ultramarine
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,192
Thanks: 5,451
Thanked 18,239 Times in 8,609 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PetrolioBenzina View Post
No.

Wow, that is what I average with E85 with JRSC, bigger injectors and pump at 310 HP.
Sapphireho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:30 PM   #38
finch1750
Undisputed El Presidente
 
finch1750's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: Zenki 37J ZN6
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 11,571
Thanks: 9,382
Thanked 9,397 Times in 5,261 Posts
Mentioned: 374 Post(s)
Tagged: 33 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapphireho View Post
Well, what if he drives downhill to work, both ways?
I did manage to get 45mpg coming home from Reno in my MR2. Went 85 in neutral the entire way down the mountain.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PetrolioBenzina View Post
Correct. To run E85 you need a specific ethanol tune. The downside is 14MPG.
Holy hell. I never got worse the 17mpg on e85. And that was the first tank where I smashed the throttle everywhere. (Not counting on track lol)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverz View Post
I guess it’s kind of an experiment. I’ve had premium gas cars for the last 20 years as my personal vehicle. I keep daily drivers for a while. My last car I had for 13 years before I traded it in. I used 87 in it for the last 6 years without issue before trading it in.

Not sure where you live where it’s only 0.20 difference between premium and 87. It’s between 0.60 to 0.80 per gallon difference where I live.
Do you have any data from your experiment besides the car didn't die while you still had it? Like timing, MPG, knock correction, etc?

I'm in CA. if there is more then 0.15 between each grade it's a rip off out here. That's crazy it jumps so high
__________________

"Just like how a strut bar somehow enables you to corner 20MPH faster around a cloverleaf on-ramp, when the reality is, you can do it already but you just don't have to balls to do it." - CSG David
finch1750 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 05:50 PM   #39
XPLSV
Member
 
XPLSV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Drives: 2015 FR-S RS1.0
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 26
Thanks: 4
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokay444 View Post
Ethanol though, has an effective octane rating of 160, and Methanol 180 through a DI system.
It has a very high latent heat of evaporation, and the benefits of running it far outweigh loss of energy. So much so that you will pass MBT before you start knocking on E85. If you can tune for it, it's great.
Your two stroke yard equipment is assembled with seals that don't stand up to the dryness of the alcohols. That's all.


Provide your car is designed for it...it will eat up a lot of the older, classic cars--same issue with the seals and such, as you mentioned. We have some E85 here, although I think in general terms when I use the term ethanol gasoline as that gasoline that is commonplace and has no more than 10% ethanol added to the mix. When I first moved to Colorado in 2005, there were quite a few places that had pure gasoline...then the numbers started to dwindle. I think we were down to one single place in town, but a three more places have opened in the past year or so. The federal gas mpg testing still uses pure gas...find this kind of funny as it has been the government mandates and subsidies that have pushed the ethanol additions over the years.
XPLSV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 06:18 PM   #40
Tcoat
Senior Member
 
Tcoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Drives: 2020 Hakone
Location: London, Ont
Posts: 69,845
Thanks: 61,656
Thanked 108,283 Times in 46,456 Posts
Mentioned: 2495 Post(s)
Tagged: 50 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapphireho View Post
There are places here and there where I live where you can get a variety of different race fuel octane levels from 98 to about 110. You won't notice any difference in your street car, except maybe an increase in acceleration due to the weight loss in your wallet.
When we used to do no class "fun run" days at the strip a couple of us with high compression (by the standards then) builds would run 100 in our street cars. We would fuel up at home (from cans) and spend about two hours tuning for it. When I say tuning I mean oldschool tuning of the carb, timing, dwell, plug gap etc with a screwdriver and wrench since computers still fill whole rooms and a laptop was a dance you got at certain clubs. After a couple of runs the noobs would ask us what we were burning and run out and buy a can or two. They would just dump it in and go for it. They could never figure out why they were never any faster.
Would have run it all the time but it cost about an hour's pay a gallon.
__________________
Racecar spelled backwards is Racecar, because Racecar.
Tcoat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tcoat For This Useful Post:
p1l0t (01-31-2019), Sapphireho (01-31-2019)
Old 01-31-2019, 06:20 PM   #41
Sapphireho
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
Sapphireho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Drives: '15 ultramarine
Location: Idaho
Posts: 13,192
Thanks: 5,451
Thanked 18,239 Times in 8,609 Posts
Mentioned: 155 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by PetrolioBenzina View Post
No. I may be an agressive driver, since the front of the 17 is so aggressive. I think it was you who said you should drive either hard on the gas or hard on the brakes. Its more fun that way!
.
Attached Images
 
Sapphireho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2019, 06:30 PM   #42
Chikna
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Drives: 2018 BRZ TS 244/500
Location: Houston
Posts: 194
Thanks: 8
Thanked 43 Times in 33 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
I use either Shell or Exxon premium (93 octane) gas, even I told dealer at the time of pickup to premium gas which they did.


I am curious, does it hurt to put fuel injectors like Chevron Techron or Seafoam, etc.
Chikna is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oil grade opinion please. Mr_YUzU_FRS Forced Induction 47 03-10-2018 02:45 AM
Weapons Grade CNC Mounts Bullitt2496 Engine Swaps 8 02-28-2017 04:18 PM
Vette-Powered BRZ by Weapons Grade shiud BRZ First-Gen (2012+) -- General Topics 28 04-28-2015 02:53 PM
Has anyone driven Laurales Grade in Monterey 1FunFR-S Southern California 0 09-30-2012 02:04 AM
Weapons Grade Performance Intro Doug@WGP Announcements, Contests, Giveaways 2 07-21-2012 05:24 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.