|
Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing Relating to suspension, chassis, and brakes. Sponsored by 949 Racing. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
![]()
I want to upgrade my suspension so that I can run my car as a somewhat comfortable daily driver, but also be able to take it to track days every month or two and have it perform well. I think many of you would agree, keeping stock shocks and doing an upgrade like this: http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/ft-8...-kit-1152.html won't cut it for track at least. I have a few options in mind (see below) and I would really appreciate some constructive responses.
*I understand that yes it is non-adjustable vs. adjustable. Keeping that in mind I really have no idea how often I would actually adjust ride height realistically. If there is a better option than the ones I have listed below please offer the suggestion so I can take it into account. Thank you. Would really like to hear from @Racecomp Engineering @CSG David @CSG Mike and @FT-86 SpeedFactory 1) Bilstein B8 Package(RCE Yellow) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...llow-1421.html 2) Bilstein B8 Package(RCE Tarmac) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...rmac-1422.html 3) Bilstein B8 Package(Pro-Kit) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...-kit-1424.html 4) Bilstein B8 Package(Sportline) - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...line-1423.html 5) Bilstein B14 PSS Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/bils...vers-1216.html 6) Skunk2 Pro-C Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/skun...vers-1725.html 7) KW V1 Coilovers - http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/kw-v...vers-1001.html 8) Fortune Auto V5 500 Series- http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/fort...lover-206.html What should I go with? Last edited by themajesticone; 08-03-2014 at 08:08 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to themajesticone For This Useful Post: | JARE_ee (08-13-2014) |
![]() |
#2 |
Señor Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 86 GT/'74 TA22 Celica/Kangaroo
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,706
Thanks: 1,104
Thanked 764 Times in 478 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
What is your budget?
__________________
1974 TA22 Celica
2013 86 GT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
$1,400-1,500
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: 2014 SWP 6MT BRZ
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 129
Thanks: 25
Thanked 38 Times in 25 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'll be ordering these in a week or so...
http://www.ft86speedfactory.com/rce-...s-brz-797.html http://www.rallysportdirect.com/Race...djustable-19mm Then again, I have a slightly different outlook on performance goals, more of an OEM+
__________________
2014 SWP 6MT BRZ Limited
Diode Dynamics Door, Trunk, Dome, Vanity, License Plate and Side Marker LEDs GrimmSpeed Plate Relocation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Frosty Carrot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I'd point you towards the Bilsteins B8 + RCE Tarmacs. You'll reduce the amount of roll, squat, and drive... without compromising much ride quality and durability.
20mm drop will reduce wheel gap, and the spring rate will increase significantly (which it needs to, with the reduced articulation). From all indications, the B8 should have adequate range of damping to match a 5 kg/mm spring. This guy provides an honest review of the setup, addressing most of my thoughts/concerns: Link to thread
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Shankenstein For This Useful Post: | themajesticone (08-03-2014) |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Drives: '13 BRZ Ltd WRB
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,351
Thanks: 508
Thanked 570 Times in 412 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
If you've got really sticky tires, that's one thing. But those bars are overkill for street.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Because compromise ®
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: Red Herring
Location: australia
Posts: 7,653
Thanks: 3,944
Thanked 9,154 Times in 4,068 Posts
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
My car is completely stock except for all the mods.
Last edited by Captain Snooze; 08-04-2014 at 03:01 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Toyotas don't have boxers
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: GTV86, ISF, TE27
Location: NZ
Posts: 212
Thanks: 148
Thanked 511 Times in 146 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I have two recommendations; that really come down to what you want.
Bilstein B8 with Tein S-Tech springs maintain good comfort, keep (if not slightly enhance) the cars stock willingness to rotate, and close the wheel gap up - as I suspect that is a motivator here. If you aren't worried about the wheel gap, I would recommend Bilstein B14. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Addict
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: 86 GT
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,217
Thanks: 249
Thanked 336 Times in 215 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
You may want to consider the Bilstein B6 as well. Apparently they have similar rates to the B8 but with a standard length body (B8 has shorter body). If that's true, then the benefit in using B6 over B8 is that you'll get a little more droop...providing you use a spring that is captive on stock damper length of course. Plus the B6 is cheaper than the B8.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fizz For This Useful Post: | SomeoneWhoIsntMe (08-05-2014), themajesticone (08-04-2014) |
![]() |
#10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Also, what do you mean a little more droop? and "providing you use a spring that is captive on stock damper length of course"? If you could clarify in detail because I am not following due to my ignorance haha. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
On Bilsteins site there is also this,
"What difference is there between BILSTEIN B6 Sport and BILSTEIN B8 Sprint shock absorbers? The BILSTEIN B6 Sport is a mono-tube gas pressure shock absorber designed to dampen wide-ranging vibrations very precisely. Where an oil shock absorber produces an oily foam and creates a spongy driving feeling after a very short distance, the BILSTEIN B6 Sport remains constant, precise and stable. The BILSTEIN B8 Sprint is a mono-tube gas pressure shock absorber specifically designed to be used with lowered vehicles with shorter stroke. It also offers the same advantages as the BILSTEIN B6 Sport shock absorber." On another site.... B6 or B8 Sprint? B6 - Ideal upgrade for standard dampers, all the benefits of B8, but standard length designed to work with standard ride height and lowering springs up to approx 30mm lowering (please note only a guide the key criteria is to ensure location of spring on droop) B8 - Specially designed for lowered sport vehicles. It's a must when sports springs are used with lowering of 30-40 mm or more. Shortened unit ensures spring is correcly located and gives less droop and more predictable control of over/undesteer and sharper responses. (In some cases only B6 will be listed.) I am learning - perhaps you could explain? So RCE Tarmacs would work perfectly fine with the B6's but Eibach Sportlines would work better on the B8's? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Frosty Carrot
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: The Atomic Carrot
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 513
Thanks: 272
Thanked 428 Times in 199 Posts
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
Don't be that guy. I've always been a fan of letting springs control body motion. Sway bars do an excellent job of leveling the car during roll, but in other situations, they can prevent each wheel from acting independently. Keep sizes reasonable, unless you're in an SCCA class that benefits from that loophole. Regarding spring choice, you have alot of good options. Pick the ones that give you the amount of comfort you'll need for your driving habits.
__________________
If you think you're nerd enough, join in the discussions about Suspension and Aerodynamic modelling!
Wall of Fame - JDL Auto Design, Raceseng, Vishnu Tuning, Penske Shocks, Nameless, Perrin, RaceComp Engineering, Essex/AP Racing, Verus, RacerX Wall of Shame - aFe Takeda, Wilwood, FA20Club |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shankenstein For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
#13 |
B6 and B8 have similar valving, the differences are:
1. B8 (probably) have a shorter bumpstop up front to allow a little more bump travel. I can't 100% confirm this is true but I believe that it is. 2. B8 have a shorter overall extended length. This means less droop travel (extension) which isn't really a good thing. For our RCE springs you can go either way, and with the B6s being cheaper it makes them a little more appealing. BUT if the B8s do have a shorter internal front bumpstop that is very helpful. There's a couple people running the B8/RCE Tarmac combo with some reviews posted here. It's firm but very well controlled. It will be a very solid "set it and forget it" package that will last a long time. Even for me non-adjustable is kind of appealing. Eibach Sportlines are IMO too low. More of a style spring whereas we focused on function first and even Eibach Pro-kit would be preferable from that standpoint. Bilstein PSS coilovers are a solid option but use progressive springs which I don't prefer. Good quality set-up though. Another option would be RCE T0 coilovers. Based on KW V1 but a little firmer and sport/track oriented. Same nice stainless finish and lifetime warranty. - Andy
__________________
Website
https://www.racecompengineering.com/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/racecompengineering https://www.instagram.com/theapexfiles <- tech articles |
|
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Racecomp Engineering For This Useful Post: | SomeoneWhoIsntMe (08-05-2014), themajesticone (08-04-2014), Turkish (08-05-2014), unsurety (08-04-2014) |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Drives: '13 UM86
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 406
Thanks: 338
Thanked 176 Times in 112 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The ISC Suspension-NA N1 Coilover System for the BRZ/FRS | ISC Suspension | Brakes, Suspension, Chassis | 17 | 04-29-2014 10:56 AM |
Can shock-dynos tell you what the highest spring rate it can handle? | fooddude | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 42 | 02-16-2014 05:43 PM |
coilover shock body height adj | garfull | Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing | 3 | 05-19-2013 04:32 AM |