|
|
#113 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: BRZ and NA
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 878
Thanks: 46
Thanked 270 Times in 167 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
A picture I took of the pre-production BRZ at the local dealer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 | |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Didn't you already post that back a few pages? lol http://www.ft86club.com/forums/showp...3&postcount=76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Drives: BRZ and NA
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 878
Thanks: 46
Thanked 270 Times in 167 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
Quote:
I did, but it seems people are still speculating that this car may only require regular or mid-grade, when it is pretty obvious that premium fuel is going to be the minimum recommended octane. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
|
Hold up, do any cars ever specify to use "plus" grade gas? Isn't it usually either premium or regular? At any rate, I expect them to state the minimum required octane rating, and the "93" here could be 93 RON, which in some places is considered "premium".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Corner Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,521 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
People will always post without looking at all the information out there. There's no speculation involved, it's already official that the car will require 93 Octane, as stated by SoA itself. But people don't pay attention, and hence this pointless speculation and people being just outright wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Corner Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2012
Drives: 13 BRZ, 11 STI, 99 RS
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,908
Thanks: 129
Thanked 1,521 Times in 702 Posts
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
|
Quote:
Nothing doubtful about it. Stated in black and white in the sales brochure. No speculation needed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#121 |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
^ I think that could very well be a typo based on it being Pre-production info. Much of US can only get 91. Makes no sense to require 93 if it isn't easily accessible.
Edit: Was looking at the WRX and STI requirement and it states 91 required and 93 recommended. I am wondering out loud if they meant something like that? I will wait until the owners manual is released for the final say. No matter what the marketing brochure says, it still does not make sense for 93 to be required. Last edited by tranzformer; 03-12-2012 at 11:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#122 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: '06 AM V8V Coupe
Location: United States of America
Posts: 5,279
Thanks: 285
Thanked 1,075 Times in 759 Posts
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
|
Note the "15 inch brake calipers", someone mentioned how that's a Japanese measurement. In Japan they happen to use RON ratings for gas, go figure. If Mazda can get 12:1 CR with regular, it's possible this doesn't need premium. As I said before it's possible that the low speed cam advance is what requires extra knock resistance due to the high charge temperature due to EGR, and this engine may not have as aggressive low speed cam advances compared to the 2GR-FSE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 | |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#124 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: 4 Wheels Auto
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,191
Thanks: 251
Thanked 274 Times in 187 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
|
May I suggest a link from Wiki about the difference of RON and AKI?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_...mber_.28RON.29 87 AKI is like 91-92 RON. 91 AKI is like 95 RON. 93 AKI is like 97 RON. I don't know where 89 AKI is slotted in terms of RON, but it could be 93 or 94 RON. But look at this line in the text: "Premium" or "Super unleaded" gasoline in US (10% ethanol blend) 97 87-88 92-93 I think this is the one we should be filling in: the premium gasoline in US with 10% ethanol blend. That is rated at AKI 92-93 with RON 97. However, with regional difference you should be ok with AKI 91 premium fuel, like that in Cali.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 | |
|
Delights in pure handling
Join Date: Apr 2011
Drives: Zoom Zoom
Location: KS
Posts: 4,854
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#126 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: 4 Wheels Auto
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,191
Thanks: 251
Thanked 274 Times in 187 Posts
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
|
Yes indeed, but that 89 AKI is never called a *premium* fuel in any region, right?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|