Greddy ITB Testing - Starts Today @ Delicious Tuning - Page 9 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

Lantanafrs2 · 01-22-2019, 09:47 PM

Nothing from racer x either. F.i. is the only way to go with these things.

NoHaveMSG · 01-22-2019, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Nothing from racer x either. F.i. is the only way to go with these things.

RacerX has teased some recent photos on FB(1-12) of their new manifold but it is not ITB.

Dr. BRZ · 01-22-2019, 11:20 PM

When will peeps ever understand....lol. The only solution to these is the revolution dual ram intake with bigger throttle body. Much cheaper and similar results.

RayRay88 · 01-23-2019, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. BRZ

When will peeps ever understand....lol. The only solution to these is the revolution dual ram intake with bigger throttle body. Much cheaper and similar results.

It would be great if you stopped spamming this thread with that suggestion.
Especially since the manifold is a known bottle neck with these motors. You know what hasn't ever come up as a bottle neck? The intake and throttle body. You're basing this on one dyno test with this intake, and they were hardly concrete/conclusive.

Just let the results come out from a reputable source regarding the ITB's, if they're still a major loss than by all means you can continue venerating the revolution intake.

Lantanafrs2 · 01-23-2019, 11:53 AM

The only bottleneck is the header. Speaking n.a. of course. Some real intelligence went into the intake design.

SuperTom · 01-23-2019, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. BRZ

When will peeps ever understand....lol. The only solution to these is the revolution dual ram intake with bigger throttle body. Much cheaper and similar results.

Why can't we have both Better intake Manifold with bigger throttle body and revolution intake?
Tune is big concern that someone works side by side hardware/tune to make it work right. Like ACE/Delicious/CSG all worked together on make the headers work

I think with the Intake Manifold tuned the front of the intake might not matter as much. Kind of like a Catback exhaust doesn't do much after the ACE headers.

PuslarBrrrz · 01-23-2019, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lantanafrs2

Nothing from racer x either. F.i. is the only way to go with these things.

They are on their second prototype and they plan on doing 4 total. RnD takes time, its not like its the only thing they have going on.

Roadcone · 01-31-2019, 11:18 AM

so... is this just another hype thread?

Lantanafrs2 · 01-31-2019, 02:37 PM

I wouldn't say hype. The results were probably poor.

DeliciousTuning · 02-08-2019, 08:42 PM

No, it is not a hype thread. We spent a lot of time on this setup dialing it in for a completely stock vehicle. What we found was the power/torque gains are all in the middle of the power band and the top end is the same. No do realize this is on a 100% stock car otherwise, running 91 octane.

The next step is to get some headers on the vehicle and see what it can do. Also working with an engine builder on some suggestions he has to make the ITB's really do their magic.

Cheers,
William Knose

Lantanafrs2 · 02-08-2019, 10:45 PM

Were the gains noticeable and repeatable, or anecdotal?

Lantanafrs2 · 02-09-2019, 06:49 PM

Nothing wrong with more midrange.

nastynate88 · 02-12-2019, 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeliciousTuning

No, it is not a hype thread. We spent a lot of time on this setup dialing it in for a completely stock vehicle. What we found was the power/torque gains are all in the middle of the power band and the top end is the same. No do realize this is on a 100% stock car otherwise, running 91 octane.

The next step is to get some headers on the vehicle and see what it can do. Also working with an engine builder on some suggestions he has to make the ITB's really do their magic.

Cheers,
William Knose

One would argue that additional mid-range power on this engine would be welcomed. Were gains substantial?

soundman98 · 02-12-2019, 11:38 AM

truth is, the only reason i want to do ITB is for the sound.

as long as it has that, i'll be happy.

01-31-2019, 11:18 AM	#120
Roadcone StreetKart Join Date: Jul 2013 Drives: 2014 Scion FR-S Monogram Location: Upstate, SC Posts: 477 Thanks: 43 Thanked 181 Times in 111 Posts Mentioned: 10 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	so... is this just another hype thread? __________________ TRD\|Verus Engineering\|Titan7\|DEZOD Motorsports\|JDL Auto Design

02-12-2019, 11:38 AM	#126
soundman98 ProCrastinationConsultant Join Date: Sep 2013 Drives: '14 Ranger, '18 Tacoma 4Dr LB Location: chicago-ish Posts: 11,330 Thanks: 35,240 Thanked 13,675 Times in 6,782 Posts Mentioned: 98 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	truth is, the only reason i want to do ITB is for the sound. as long as it has that, i'll be happy. __________________ "The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time"

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Delicious Tuning - Q&A EcuTeK ProECU Tuning and Maps	DeliciousTuning	Software Tuning	1213	06-17-2025 05:02 PM
Delicious Tuning	RallySTI	User/Vendor/Sponsor Reviews, Feedback, Comments	2	12-02-2017 05:19 PM
Delicious Tuning needs your help!	DeliciousTuning	Off-Topic Lounge [WARNING: NO POLITICS]	0	08-14-2017 09:33 PM
Mann Engineering 2nd Quarter Tuning Days April 25th & 26th by Bill (Delicious Tuning)	DesertFrs	Northern California	14	04-24-2014 04:15 AM
Delicious Tuning - Dyno Tuning Weekend at Mann Engineering's (San Jose, CA)	DeliciousTuning	Announcements, Contests, Giveaways	6	09-19-2013 06:55 PM

01-22-2019, 09:47 PM	#113
Lantanafrs2 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Drives: 2013 frs red Location: South Florida Posts: 3,562 Thanks: 2,568 Thanked 3,126 Times in 1,680 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	Nothing from racer x either. F.i. is the only way to go with these things.

01-23-2019, 11:53 AM	#117
Lantanafrs2 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Drives: 2013 frs red Location: South Florida Posts: 3,562 Thanks: 2,568 Thanked 3,126 Times in 1,680 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	The only bottleneck is the header. Speaking n.a. of course. Some real intelligence went into the intake design.

01-31-2019, 02:37 PM	#121
Lantanafrs2 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Drives: 2013 frs red Location: South Florida Posts: 3,562 Thanks: 2,568 Thanked 3,126 Times in 1,680 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	I wouldn't say hype. The results were probably poor.

02-08-2019, 08:42 PM	#122
DeliciousTuning PhoneFlash by EcuTeK Join Date: Dec 2012 Drives: Edelbrock Equipped - Subaru BRZ Location: San Diego, CA Posts: 1,611 Thanks: 309 Thanked 1,683 Times in 581 Posts Mentioned: 403 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	No, it is not a hype thread. We spent a lot of time on this setup dialing it in for a completely stock vehicle. What we found was the power/torque gains are all in the middle of the power band and the top end is the same. No do realize this is on a 100% stock car otherwise, running 91 octane. The next step is to get some headers on the vehicle and see what it can do. Also working with an engine builder on some suggestions he has to make the ITB's really do their magic. Cheers, William Knose

02-08-2019, 10:45 PM	#123
Lantanafrs2 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Drives: 2013 frs red Location: South Florida Posts: 3,562 Thanks: 2,568 Thanked 3,126 Times in 1,680 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	Were the gains noticeable and repeatable, or anecdotal?

02-09-2019, 06:49 PM	#124
Lantanafrs2 Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2018 Drives: 2013 frs red Location: South Florida Posts: 3,562 Thanks: 2,568 Thanked 3,126 Times in 1,680 Posts Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Tagged: 1 Thread(s)	Nothing wrong with more midrange.

User Name		Remember Me?
Password