follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Software Tuning

Software Tuning Discuss all software tuning topics.


User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2014, 12:07 PM   #71
Td-d
Garden variety obsessive
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2009 Sti Hatch; 2015 Audi RSQ3
Location: South Africa
Posts: 532
Thanks: 54
Thanked 448 Times in 245 Posts
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesm View Post
it's likely that map definition is wrong or isn't scaled properly or something, as a value of 1 or 2 degrees will definitely disable coarse correction.
Definitely the correct address, and no scaling required - it's a float value. It's simply set at zero for the BRZs...

The logic behind getting into rough correction mode is quite convoluted - not just Rough_Correction_Minimum_KC_Advance_Map_Value involved.

This is a good reference - http://www.romraider.com/forum/topic1840.html
Td-d is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Td-d For This Useful Post:
s2d4 (03-12-2014), steve99 (03-12-2014)
Old 03-11-2014, 12:13 PM   #72
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Td-d View Post
Definitely the correct address, and no scaling required - it's a float value. It's simply set at zero for the BRZs...

The logic behind getting into rough correction mode is quite convoluted - not just Rough_Correction_Minimum_KC_Advance_Map_Value involved.

This is a good reference - http://www.romraider.com/forum/topic1840.html
that pretty much mirrors the other docs i've read, actually suggesting that the last applied FLKC value be >= 3.9 degrees... and that the advance value in the map be greater than 4.9 (which i hadn't seen before, i'd only read about the FLKC value). it doesn't seem to mention anything about a value in a table, unless they just skipped over that bit:

To exit from fine correction mode to rough correction mode, ALL of the following requirements must be met:
  • Engine speed and load must be within the ranges specified by the 'Rough Correction Range' tables.
  • Timing advance (maximum) map value is greater than 4.9 degrees.
  • Some FLKC value change (positive or negative) occured last execution.
  • The last FLKC applied value (|x|) is greater than 3.9 degrees (that is, the absolute correction -> ex. -4 = 4)
  • The last FLKC raw difference (|y| * 2.84) is greater than last timing advance (maximum) map value.
  • (IAM > 1) or (IAM <= 1 and last applied FLKC was positive).

Of course this all applies to a car that isn't ours... it could totally be wrong. I have found through experimentation that using less than 3.9 in the advance table keeps it from dropping, that's all i know for sure. then again, i often set it to zero in those areas just coincidentally, so maybe that's why it doesn't seem as though the table matters. i could swear i remember running 0<value<3.9 in the advance and not seeing it drop, though i cant be sure about that without correlating old roms to logs or testing it again.
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 01:39 PM   #73
Td-d
Garden variety obsessive
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Drives: 2009 Sti Hatch; 2015 Audi RSQ3
Location: South Africa
Posts: 532
Thanks: 54
Thanked 448 Times in 245 Posts
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Yeah, it is odd that that's the case. Maybe setting that value to 0 changes the way the logic handles the advance tables - I've never really looked at it closely. The logic is pretty much the same as other Subarus, incidentally.
Td-d is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Td-d For This Useful Post:
jamesm (03-12-2014), s2d4 (03-12-2014), steve99 (03-11-2014)
Old 03-11-2014, 11:07 PM   #74
s2d4
Senior Member
 
s2d4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: R32 GTR, AW11 MR2 SC, GTS86 R
Location: OZ
Posts: 2,615
Thanks: 603
Thanked 1,223 Times in 708 Posts
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Code:
If (in fine correction) {
           If (pulled more than 4 degrees or the ECU is unhappy) {
                  Goto (IAM correction)
            }
            If (Large/rapid change in engine load) {
                  Goto (FBKC)
             }
} else {
           Check to see if any adjustments need to be made
           Stay in FLKC correction mode
           }
If (in FBKC mode) {
      While (engine load is rapidly changing) {
            Check for knock and pull timing if needed
            When (Done) {
                     Go back to previous mode
             }
        } 
}
According to the above, it would be part of fbkc as tip in would be where the load changed rapidly. This falls in line with my earlier log as knock correction as according to shiv is fbkc.

Looks like I'll need access to flkc @shiv@vishnu to confirm for myself or @Td-d /anyone with previous subaru platforms to clarify if the number in the map that dictates where coarse correction starts is at 4, and since ours is set at 0 so behaves differently.
s2d4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 12:24 AM   #75
steve99
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Drives: FT86
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,998
Thanks: 1,035
Thanked 4,988 Times in 2,982 Posts
Mentioned: 598 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by s2d4 View Post
Looks like I'll need access to flkc @shiv@vishnu to confirm for myself or @Td-d /anyone with previous subaru platforms to clarify if the number in the map that dictates where coarse correction starts is at 4, and since ours is set at 0 so behaves differently.
I did log FLCK as well as FBCK (via tactrix logging) very few occurrences of FLCK highest -0.67 compared to many occurrances of FBCK with values up to -2.3.

As for where course correction starts well got no idea
steve99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2014, 12:29 AM   #76
jamesm
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 FR-S
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,929
Thanks: 1,166
Thanked 2,293 Times in 1,180 Posts
Mentioned: 313 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Most of the tip in knock I see shows up in fbkc. It'll write into fine learning sometimes though, particularly when tipping in to a long pull.
jamesm is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamesm For This Useful Post:
steve99 (03-12-2014)
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BC Racing Coilovers - Knock? 636 Suspension | Chassis | Brakes -- Sponsored by 949 Racing 42 12-09-2015 10:41 PM
FR-S Rod knock pozer Issues | Warranty | Recalls / TSB 95 11-03-2015 09:39 AM
ca-fi knock off questions fionnsfrs Electronics | Audio | NAV | Infotainment 2 10-27-2013 01:47 PM
Knock on e85 not a problem? gdrider77 Forced Induction 76 10-20-2013 11:36 PM
Would you rather buy knock off parts for your car? EJ20 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 63 11-02-2011 06:17 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.