follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Speed By Design
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > 1st Gens: Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 / Subaru BRZ > BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics

BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics All discussions about the first-gen Subaru BRZ coupe

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-26-2011, 06:22 PM   #71
tripjammer
Senior Member
 
tripjammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Drives: WRB BRZ limited 6MT
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,765
Thanks: 3,109
Thanked 178 Times in 142 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggy51 View Post
I could've sworn that Scion mentioned that the LSD will appear on all models (well there's only one model technically)
People keep thinking the high-spec model if super equipped...it's not.

In the leaked high-spec trim, you get a leather steering wheel, 17 inch rims, sport seats, push button start, aluminum pedals, hids, fog lights, automatic climate control.

You want all these options...if the price is going to be $24k
Where is leather seats, Bluetooth, radio, 18 inch rims, brembo brakes, navigation, sunroof, power seats with memory?

Personally I don't want any of that...i just want what is in the high-spec trim level.

Except for the hids and fog lights a 2012 scion tC release 7 comes better equipped.

Scion has to price this car higher than the tC. So figure $24k if we are lucky. Subaru has to price the BRZ less than the wrx...so figure $25k max.

We could be suprised and scion releases two trim levels. We will see next week.
This is a new car for both brands scion and Subaru...both don't have a rwd sports car.

Hey everything is speculation until final reveal in less than 3 days. We will have all our answers then.
tripjammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:26 PM   #72
WingsofWar
MODERATOR-SAMA
 
WingsofWar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Drives: Swagtron Scooter
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,685
Thanks: 345
Thanked 1,562 Times in 524 Posts
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MotoChris98 View Post
It's all about the tires, and the balance of the car. My current winter car here in Colorado is a Miata with Continental ExtremeWinterContact tires on it, in a size narrower and with taller sidewall than stock (rally style). In the type of snow I encounter, the all around driving characteristics in this setup are better than the WRX I had with all season tires (they were Continental ExtremeContact DWS, which are supposed to have some of the best snow capability of current all seasons). The WRX would've been an amazing machine in the snow with snow tires, but the Miata has been excellent with snows, and that's on a 2nd gen Miata with no traction control, no lsd, no abs. With snow tires, the Miata has outstanding braking and great cornering, but in the icier patches you do have to be gentler with the throttle to help the rear tires hook up off the line (something that the lsd and traction control will help with in the BRZ/FR-S). The main limiting factor is the ground clearance, there's only so much snow that the Miata can plow with the bumper. The kind of depth that would get it stuck would probably cause them to close I-70 anyways, though. Lots of people in Europe got by with RWD in snow for a long time. I think a lot of the AWD craze in the US is a marketing thing.
I agree i faired very well in my 300zx and rx7 in the snow. and while AWD does provide additional traction, its spoiled peoples view of real safety during ill weather transport. AWD can be just as effective AND non-effective in ill weather as any 2wd vehicle.
__________________
WingsofWar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:33 PM   #73
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripjammer View Post
People keep thinking the high-spec model if super equipped...it's not.

In the leaked high-spec trim, you get a leather steering wheel, 17 inch rims, sport seats, push button start, aluminum pedals, hids, fog lights, automatic climate control.

You want all these options...if the price is going to be $24k
Where is leather seats, Bluetooth, radio, 18 inch rims, brembo brakes, navigation, sunroof, power seats with memory?

Personally I don't want any of that...i just want what is in the high-spec trim level.

Except for the hids and fog lights a 2012 scion tC release 7 comes better equipped.

Scion has to price this car higher than the tC. So figure $24k if we are lucky. Subaru has to price the BRZ less than the wrx...so figure $25k max.

We could be suprised and scion releases two trim levels. We will see next week.
This is a new car for both brands scion and Subaru...both don't have a rwd sports car.

Hey everything is speculation until final reveal in less than 3 days. We will have all our answers then.
Well I was referencing the Jack Hollis presentation when they showed the FR-S concept when he mentioned the LSD. Though I do think radio would be included for the FR-S.

Remind me what's the overall performance difference on 16" and 17" wheels. That 1 extra inch should give you more grip?
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:38 PM   #74
Snoopyalien24
Mr. Sarcasm
 
Snoopyalien24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Drives: 2016 VW Jetta TSI Sport 5-Speed
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,729
Thanks: 1,275
Thanked 753 Times in 491 Posts
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tripjammer View Post
You want all these options...if the price is going to be $24k
Where is leather seats, Bluetooth, radio, 18 inch rims, brembo brakes, navigation, sunroof, power seats with memory?

Scion has to price this car higher than the tC. So figure $24k if we are lucky. Subaru has to price the BRZ less than the wrx...so figure $25k max.
I honestly don't think so. I mean, for $2,000 - $3,000 more, you can get a v6 mustang with a bunch of power, and pretty nice interior.

Why would we pay more to have less power and less weight? Deep down i wish this would replace the tC and leave it the same price. For $23k, one can get a heavy GC, but the majority of people don't look at weight, they look at HP, so many will say oh wow i rather get a GC or a 'Stang because it's so much more powerful.

And as for the snow talk, man I am so glad I live in South FL, I watch on tv those under bad snow days and see it really does suck. Our rain is really bad too, cuz our dirt isn't really dirt, its like sand.
Snoopyalien24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:46 PM   #75
SUB-FT86
86 Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Drives: 2013 Toyota 86 2.0T (Asphalt)
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 3,129
Thanks: 126
Thanked 527 Times in 296 Posts
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA1 View Post
But as a daily you can not race every time every day.

Race driver friend of mine Touring Car legend (RX3/RX7s) owned a Honda S2000 not even as a daily and got rid of it because of what i stated above.

SUB-FT86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:49 PM   #76
nixeighty6
Member
 
nixeighty6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Drives: Faster than you!
Location: Harrisburg PA USA
Posts: 61
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
i second that Rwd in the snow is fine with the correct tires. i used winterforce tires on my factory 14 on my 85 ae86 and loved every minute. and used some all season tire one my s2000 and just took it easy and didn't drive in real deep stuff.. I'de take a rwd with good snow tires against any awd with shit tires in a race any day.

the torque being reported is as much as the ap1 s2k's (or close enough)

I'm in for the first gen.. i once said i wouldn't unless higher HP, but i can't afford more than 25k in the spring.. so it gives me and TRD/Sti time..
nixeighty6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:50 PM   #77
Longhorn248
Hook 'em
 
Longhorn248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggy51 View Post
Well I was referencing the Jack Hollis presentation when they showed the FR-S concept when he mentioned the LSD. Though I do think radio would be included for the FR-S.

Remind me what's the overall performance difference on 16" and 17" wheels. That 1 extra inch should give you more grip?
The extra inch on the wheels doesn't add any grip. That's the diameter dimension not the width. The larger rim just means a thinner tire sidewall and theoretically a less comfortable ride.
Longhorn248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:53 PM   #78
Longhorn248
Hook 'em
 
Longhorn248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixeighty6 View Post

I'm in for the first gen.. i once said i wouldn't unless higher HP, but i can't afford more than 25k in the spring.. so it gives me and TRD/Sti time..
Unless anything drastic happens I'm also planning on being in for the first gen. I'm still undecided on BRZ vs. FR-S though, it will probably come down to colors and available trim levels.
Longhorn248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:53 PM   #79
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn248 View Post
The extra inch on the wheels doesn't add any grip. That's the diameter dimension not the width. The larger rim just means a thinner tire sidewall and theoretically a less comfortable ride.
... Wait... why would you want a thinner sidewall? I understand that tires aren't going to last forever, but ... well... how is thinner better? I hope that's not another excuse you can use for less weight...
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:55 PM   #80
Longhorn248
Hook 'em
 
Longhorn248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggy51 View Post
... Wait... why would you want a thinner sidewall? I understand that tires aren't going to last forever, but ... well... how is thinner better? I hope that's not another excuse you can use for less weight...
Thinner can provide less lateral movement, but it isn't necessarily better. The thinner sidewall is just a result of the larger diameter rim.
Longhorn248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 06:56 PM   #81
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
hmmm that's interesting. I suppose you can get a more interesting look but for someone like me that's looking more at the FR-S/BRZ as a DD ... does it really matter for tire size?
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 07:05 PM   #82
Longhorn248
Hook 'em
 
Longhorn248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Drives: 2013 BRZ
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,950
Thanks: 68
Thanked 152 Times in 79 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggy51 View Post
hmmm that's interesting. I suppose you can get a more interesting look but for someone like me that's looking more at the FR-S/BRZ as a DD ... does it really matter for tire size?
As a daily driver there isn't going to be any difference between a set of 16's or 17's other than the way they look
Longhorn248 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 07:09 PM   #83
Buggy51
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Drives: Put Put
Location: CA
Posts: 607
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn248 View Post
As a daily driver there isn't going to be any difference between a set of 16's or 17's other than the way they look
Hmmm well guess tire size is irrelevant for me lol. I'm guessing a set of 16" might be cheaper than a set of 17" as well?

And to stay on topic.... uhm... erm... well don't think that's possible on this forum.

But for the height number, maybe its referring to the prototype version?
Buggy51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2011, 07:18 PM   #84
Aki
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Drives: '96 beater Corolla
Location: Cali
Posts: 409
Thanks: 7
Thanked 32 Times in 14 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
My guess is that this pic is real.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WingsofWar View Post
Yeah, i understand why you would think its a real photo. But its not. The image looks like studio lighting, but for Road and Track to have studio shots before the reveal in 3 days before anyone else is highly unlikely.
You gotta understand how print publications work, and press shots work.

Magazines usually require about a month lead time typically from final copy to mass printing. Which means they got these images at least a month or two prior. Studio shots of production cars can be taken months before an official unveiling. Renderings are often used along with studio photos for official photos.

It's very typical for print magazines get images of the cars a month or two they're unveiled. This is standard practice so that the issue that goes on newsstands coincides with the car shows/press unveilings. If say Car & Driver got the official images of the BRZ at the Tokyo Motor show, that'd take an additional 1-2 months to publish that in a magazine, and by then it'd be too late. Print is a totally different animal than online. They don't take press assets then turn them around in a couple days or a week. They get assets, editor writes it, copy editor looks at it, layout gets set (along with pagination), final proof, then it goes to the printer. It's a lengthy process, which is why mags get assets way ahead of time.

If this R&T issue was supposed to hit newstands at or around the time of Tokyo Auto show, then this pic is likely legit, whether it's a studio or rendering.
Aki is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
brz forum, brz forums, brz racing, production brz, production subaru brz, subaru brz forum, subaru brz forums, subaru brz racing


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modellista Toyota 86 Revealed quik1987 Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 385 12-04-2011 05:51 PM
New Official Toyota Trailer! First Video Featuring Production FR-S / FT-86 Ogawa07 FR-S & 86 Photos, Videos, Wallpapers, Gallery Forum 296 11-30-2011 12:05 AM
New info!! I saw production photos no camo nickatdunning Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 11 07-28-2011 03:44 PM
Official FT-86 II Concept Press Release, Press Photos, Videos Hachiroku Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 126 05-18-2011 02:27 AM
FT-86 production version NOT at 2010 Geneva (yet). Photos of FT-86 concept from show. Hachiroku Scion FR-S / Toyota 86 GT86 General Forum 132 03-08-2010 04:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.