follow ft86club on our blog, twitter or facebook.
FT86CLUB
Ft86Club
Delicious Tuning
Register Garage Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Go Back   Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community - FT86CLUB > Technical Topics > Forced Induction

Forced Induction Turbo, Supercharger, Methanol, Nitrous

Register and become an FT86Club.com member. You will see fewer ads

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-13-2012, 08:14 PM   #71
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 615
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 478 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drifter View Post
But, as Sportsguy stated, are you sure the other set-ups like Vortechs will pass emitions?
Do you think that it's a significant possibility that it would not? That is the reason I've been looking at S/C instead of turbo because I figured if it retained both cats then it would pass emissions.

Also, if I wanted to make AVO's kit pass emissions(in a non-CARB state), is that possible or what could I do to make that happen in the most cost effective way?
Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 08:28 PM   #72
Coheed
Senior Member
 
Coheed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: DGM BRZ Limited
Location: Seattle
Posts: 813
Thanks: 209
Thanked 225 Times in 157 Posts
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by drifter View Post
But, as Sportsguy stated, are you sure the other set-ups like Vortechs will pass emitions? The idea behind the AVO was simplicity and stealth, eventhough it deletes one of the cats.

So, for me, the best FI system out there for the money is worthless to me if I"m going to get it trouble or issued a fine because I live in CA.
The AP kit is really stealth, much moreso than the AVO. The Vortech is completely obvious.

The AVO kit deletes 2 of the 3 cats. Also this will have some issues with CEL unless the system tricks the O2 sensors. I'm sure they have thought of this during development of the kit.

The AP kit keeps the factory manifold, as does the Vortech kit. This will retain the factory emissions equipment so you shouldn't have any issues.

The AP kit is my favorite. The FT86club kit also looks great, and it takes queues from the AP kit. Of course, there are only so many ways to make a kit. The FT86club kit also has not been tested.

I lean towards the AP kit most. Haters will hate the oil scavenge system. But the turbo mounts low, is lightweight, keeps the COG down, and it installs simple with no cutting or welding.
Coheed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2012, 09:22 PM   #73
AVOturboworld
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Drives: 2013 "AVO Orange" FR-S
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,067
Thanks: 69
Thanked 2,277 Times in 636 Posts
Mentioned: 108 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Just to note here, there's two cats, not three. One in the exhaust manifold, and then the secondary in the frontpipe section. And we'd remove that primary one way or another anyways, we are not a fan of having a cat before the turbocharger. Not due to performance issues, but other issues.
AVOturboworld is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AVOturboworld For This Useful Post:
Jive Turkey (11-27-2012), Sportsguy83 (11-15-2012)
Old 11-13-2012, 09:42 PM   #74
JoeBoxer
Senior Member
 
JoeBoxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Drives: Whiteout FR-S
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 4,154
Thanks: 1,666
Thanked 1,627 Times in 997 Posts
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Yeah no way i would want a cat in front of the turbo, i didn't even think of that.
JoeBoxer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 07:19 PM   #75
2forme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: MA
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,552 Times in 843 Posts
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
FWIW I did a quick, rough torque graph between the Vortech SC, AVO turbo kit (92 octane) and what my car did on Visconti e85/AFE/SRT.

I added 4% to the dynojet numbers to account for the higher numbers that dynapacks produce.
Attached Images
 
2forme is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2forme For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (11-15-2012)
Old 11-14-2012, 08:50 PM   #76
drifter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: truck and old car
Location: CA
Posts: 295
Thanks: 120
Thanked 168 Times in 66 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
hmm....Makes clearer what Mandalay was talking about re Vortech, not achieving full potential until very highest RPM's.

Also, this from PERIN/Vortech thread: "The power at 3000 is just a bit more so the punch while just cruising down the road is better. But if you are 4000 or higher the punch is instant and perfect."

Not an expert at reading graphs here, but does the above graph reflect this statement?
drifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 08:57 PM   #77
2forme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: MA
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,552 Times in 843 Posts
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Yea, one thing to consider is the cost of a clutch. The AVO will need a clutch. I'm not sure if the Vortech will since it makes 25 less ft lbs than the AVO.

All things considered, you're getting a lot more power for the money with AVO... even with the clutch.
2forme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2012, 09:37 PM   #78
Pete
Senior Member
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: 22 BRZ
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 615
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 478 Times in 230 Posts
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2forme View Post
FWIW I did a quick, rough torque graph between the Vortech SC, AVO turbo kit (92 octane) and what my car did on Visconti e85/AFE/SRT.

I added 4% to the dynojet numbers to account for the higher numbers that dynapacks produce.
You got really good results out of V's E85 tune! I wonder what an E85 tune would look like with that Vortech kit. Or AVO's kit for that matter. A Valero just opened near my place with E85 and a touch free car wash.

Pete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 08:05 AM   #79
Sportsguy83
I Love custom Turbo kits
 
Sportsguy83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Drives: Limited BRZ
Location: Miami
Posts: 10,770
Thanks: 20,004
Thanked 8,346 Times in 4,361 Posts
Mentioned: 441 Post(s)
Tagged: 12 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2forme View Post
Yea, one thing to consider is the cost of a clutch. The AVO will need a clutch. I'm not sure if the Vortech will since it makes 25 less ft lbs than the AVO.

All things considered, you're getting a lot more power for the money with AVO... even with the clutch.
It all depends on how you drive really. If the kit where making 230-250 TQ, I would wholeheartedly agree, it would definitely need a clutch. But, at peak 197 TQ, it will depend how you handle your clutch. I'm sure a lot of people not killing it on shifts or launch will be able to keep the stock clutch for a long time.
Sportsguy83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 08:13 AM   #80
2forme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: MA
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,552 Times in 843 Posts
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sportsguy83 View Post
It all depends on how you drive really. If the kit where making 230-250 TQ, I would wholeheartedly agree, it would definitely need a clutch. But, at peak 197 TQ, it will depend how you handle your clutch. I'm sure a lot of people not killing it on shifts or launch will be able to keep the stock clutch for a long time.
Yea. True. If I go with this kit, I'm going to try it with no clutch upgrade first. I don't beat the snot out of my clutch. I rev match 99.9% of the time anyway.
2forme is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 2forme For This Useful Post:
Sportsguy83 (11-15-2012)
Old 11-15-2012, 08:42 AM   #81
gmookher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
I'll be pairing the FI solution on my car from Vortech with a higher HP clutch, have no reason to not try the lightweight option. my last clutch purchase was years ago, from centerforce. Looking at the fx400 for non lightweight, dunno whose product is good on the race side.
gmookher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 08:50 AM   #82
2forme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: MA
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,552 Times in 843 Posts
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmookher View Post
I'll be pairing the FI solution on my car from Vortech with a higher HP clutch, have no reason to not try the lightweight option. my last clutch purchase was years ago, from centerforce. Looking at the fx400 for non lightweight, dunno whose product is good on the race side.
Clutches are rated in torque, not HP. Because clamping force doesn't really care what RPM you're making the torque at.

I, personally run an ACT 6 puck in my other car. It's a bit on the stiff side, but easy to get used to. Has held up superb, so I would definitely recommend ACT clutches.
2forme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 08:57 AM   #83
gmookher
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Drives: VortechSC,BorlaEL,Perrin,GCRace
Location: HighHeatHighAltitudeAZ,USA
Posts: 2,254
Thanks: 458
Thanked 669 Times in 394 Posts
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2forme View Post
Clutches are rated in torque, not HP. Because clamping force doesn't really care what RPM you're making the torque at.

I, personally run an ACT 6 puck in my other car. It's a bit on the stiff side, but easy to get used to. Has held up superb, so I would definitely recommend ACT clutches.
Saw that you were looking into ACT on another thread, but didnt read it fully, do they have a application for our car? Lightweight?

What other car(hehe)?
gmookher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2012, 09:36 AM   #84
2forme
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Drives: 2013 Subaru BRZ Limited
Location: MA
Posts: 2,974
Thanks: 972
Thanked 1,552 Times in 843 Posts
Mentioned: 164 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmookher View Post
Saw that you were looking into ACT on another thread, but didnt read it fully, do they have a application for our car? Lightweight?

What other car(hehe)?
They've got a street disc which should hold your Vortech kit. You have the option to buy with a flywheel as well. 750$ I think, but don't quote me on that.
2forme is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
supercharger, turbo


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supercharger or Turbo ? #87 Forced Induction 192 01-25-2013 11:20 AM
TRD Supercharger anyone?? poormans_LFA Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 48 04-28-2012 12:42 AM
Using Subarus other turbo Boxers as an idea, how much HP could a turbo BRZ/FR-S have? HitTheGas BRZ First-Gen (2012+) — General Topics 12 02-21-2012 02:24 PM
Induction Poll - NA, Supercharger, or Turbo cloud9 Engine, Exhaust, Transmission 45 02-21-2012 01:41 PM
Geneva Preview: Techart to debut 911 Turbo, Turbo S vh_supra26 Other Vehicles & General Automotive Discussions 1 02-22-2010 07:20 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.