Have you hit 200whp NA? - Page 5 - Toyota GR86, 86, FR-S and Subaru BRZ Forum & Owners Community

The Slow One · 01-09-2013, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTB/ZR-1

^^^

Red is totally stock? Are those SAE or STD #s?

If so, the juice looks hardly worth the squeeze, unfortunately...

Thx for posting

no, Red is all bolt-ons, no tune. not sure what the correction factor was, I can go back to their shop and ask them. I wished I ran my car on the dyno stock also. But a close reference point is my friend @Do Boy's stock dyno.
Bone Stock:

After the before/after headers and midpipe(he also had a exhaust and intake already on the before run):

His car(red) and my car (blue) comparison:

I forgot to mention, his car is still untuned. I might be getting his header next lol.

Simmons · 01-09-2013, 01:47 PM

In your pic of your dyno it says STD for correction factor

2forme · 01-09-2013, 01:52 PM

I'll post up my dynos with STD correction later this afternoon.

ultra · 01-09-2013, 06:57 PM

Counting on you, @2forme

Betting that 200 on 93 wih bolt ons isn't gonna happen any time soon though, so no pressure.

2forme · 01-09-2013, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ultra

Counting on you, @2forme

Betting that 200 on 93 wih bolt ons isn't gonna happen any time soon though, so no pressure.

Here is my best E85 run and 93 run in STD correction. Both had AFE intake and SRT exhaust and tuned by Visconti.

OrbitalEllipses · 01-09-2013, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme

Here is my best E85 run and 93 run in STD correction. Both had AFE intake and SRT exhaust and tuned by Visconti.

Type of dyno? Atmosphere conditions? Altitude?

GTB/ZR-1 · 01-09-2013, 08:14 PM

Probably 5-7 more HP w/ STD correction, compared to SAE, @ these HP levels on a Dynojet.

OrbitalEllipses · 01-09-2013, 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTB/ZR-1

Dynojet.

Whoops, didn't see that at the top. I hit 172whp SAE untuned on a Dynojet...which already reads high. I don't think we'll be seeing 200whp on pump on any heartbreaker dyno.

GTB/ZR-1 · 01-09-2013, 08:27 PM

I think that SAE Dynojet #s are fairly accurate. Most of my cars have been dynoed on Dynojets & the SAE whp translates out to trap speeds that are in line w/ them.

Although some on this forum think I'm off my rocker by calculating HP via trap speed... lol

track_warrior · 01-09-2013, 08:28 PM

Vivid Racing hit 100000000000WHP on just a intake and exhaust, 200 is easy bro.

industrial · 01-09-2013, 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pcasso87

Vivid Racing hit 100000000000WHP on just a intake and exhaust, 200 is easy bro.

No it was with a flywheel and shift knob. +45whp.

I think we're going to need cams and a few internals to get a higher redline to see a real 200+whp NA on pump.

2forme · 01-09-2013, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTB/ZR-1

Probably 5-7 more HP w/ STD correction, compared to SAE, @ these HP levels on a Dynojet.

The difference on both of my runs in that dyno is 4whp between STD and SAE, not 5-7.

Mathewgzlz · 01-10-2013, 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2forme

That torque curve looks a bit different than most dynos of this car. Care to share the AFR curve?

Yea ill post as soon as I find the papers I filed them away Ill post in the morning

ultra · 01-10-2013, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by industrial

No it was with a flywheel and shift knob. +45whp.

I think we're going to need cams and a few internals to get a higher redline to see a real 200+whp NA on pump.

I tend to agree with this. Our cars' hp seems to fall off after 7k or so pretty consistently as is, regardless of the tune.

Hence why I don't see any point in having the rev limit raised, even though ECUTek can do that.

01-09-2013, 01:47 PM	#58
Simmons Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Drives: 2024 GR86/ 2015 FRS Location: PA Posts: 961 Thanks: 306 Thanked 575 Times in 269 Posts Mentioned: 17 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	In your pic of your dyno it says STD for correction factor __________________ 2024 GR86 71 STR/ 2015 FRS 71 STX Sponsors Xero-Limit//Karcepts

01-09-2013, 06:57 PM	#60
ultra Curious cat. Join Date: May 2012 Drives: 86 GT base M/T - Red Location: Dubai Posts: 775 Thanks: 840 Thanked 383 Times in 191 Posts Mentioned: 31 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Counting on you, @2forme Betting that 200 on 93 wih bolt ons isn't gonna happen any time soon though, so no pressure. __________________ 2013 Toyota 86 GT M/T 2009 Renault Clio Sport R27 Team F1 Edition (sold) 1991 Mazda MX5 Miata (sold) 2007 Mitsubishi Evo 9 RS (sold) 2006 VW Golf R32 (sold)

01-09-2013, 08:28 PM	#66
track_warrior Track Junkie Join Date: Mar 2012 Drives: Faster than the Stig! Location: TX Posts: 1,338 Thanks: 530 Thanked 770 Times in 363 Posts Mentioned: 10 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Vivid Racing hit 100000000000WHP on just a intake and exhaust, 200 is easy bro. __________________ Compensating a heavy car with horsepower is like giving an alcoholic cocaine to sober him up...

01-09-2013, 08:14 PM	#63
GTB/ZR-1 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Drives: '13 BRZ in WRB--let's mod!!! Location: Central, FL Posts: 1,224 Thanks: 317 Thanked 449 Times in 262 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	Probably 5-7 more HP w/ STD correction, compared to SAE, @ these HP levels on a Dynojet.

01-09-2013, 08:27 PM	#65
GTB/ZR-1 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Drives: '13 BRZ in WRB--let's mod!!! Location: Central, FL Posts: 1,224 Thanks: 317 Thanked 449 Times in 262 Posts Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Tagged: 0 Thread(s)	I think that SAE Dynojet #s are fairly accurate. Most of my cars have been dynoed on Dynojets & the SAE whp translates out to trap speeds that are in line w/ them. Although some on this forum think I'm off my rocker by calculating HP via trap speed... lol

User Name		Remember Me?
Password