|
||||||
| FR-S / BRZ vs.... Area to discuss the FR-S/BRZ against its competitors [NO STREET RACING] |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#43 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Drives: 2013 BRZ GBS
Location: Arizona
Posts: 261
Thanks: 65
Thanked 57 Times in 37 Posts
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
That is true alot of that is that low end torque and the brz is way better around the corners. For some reason my insurance is a lot higher on the WRX, a lot higher about 1.5 of the brz. Might need to switch companies. Unfortunately due to mods and mostly driving habits my wrx mpg is shit lol, but that's probably mostly my fault. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2014 FR-S
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 284
Thanks: 216
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I used to live in colorado, and honestly I would not drive a rwd car if I was still there.
I had a 2006 STI a few years ago, and the engine and acceleration was awesome, all stock. My FR-S is WAY slower, but basically I'm pepping it up to make it drive more how I like it. (Lightwieght drivetrain parts for now, maybe a basic tune.) You'll feel after a few months that Toyota/Subaru were such pussies when they tuned this car. So if you aren't SURE you want the FRS and know EXACTLY what it's about, you might end up getting rid of it pretty soon also. My STI always pissed me off though b/c it had 300bhp and it couldn't slide around turns, and it had crazy understeer past the limit. I had a 2001 S4 before that with even worse understeer. So I needed a car like the FRS without understeer. I'd never get it if I lived in a snowy place. But other people said the aids really help a lot so maybe it could work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Drives: 2013 BRZ Limited
Location: Angier, NC
Posts: 30
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 7 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
I traded my 60,000 mile 2004 WRX STI for my 8,000 Mile (At the time) BRZ. The absolute only downfall is less power. And quite frankly, I don't even miss it at this point as the BRZ almost has more useable power (A lot less drama to get up to speed we'll say, at a normal rate). Now, a WRX is going to be more comfortable and quieter then a 04 STI (04 STI's had no sound deadening...etc) but really, I never purchased my STI for BMW Fit and Finish. My STI achieved 21 MPG no matter how I drove it. Drive like an asshole? 21. Drive like a Grandma? 21. My BRZ rewards me with 28 MPG on my mixed commute. On a 28 Mile drive one way to work, that's a big deal.
Once I figured out the BRZ's powerband I never looked back. ![]() -Sam
__________________
2013 WRB BRZ Limited - DD
1992 Taurus SHO - Auto-X Prepared - 13.1@107 2012 Mazdaspeed 3 - Wife's DD. 2002 SVT Focus -....? |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Drives: BMW
Location: TX
Posts: 2,400
Thanks: 1,972
Thanked 1,827 Times in 954 Posts
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
the WRX maybe roomier, more power and ect. but I think they are ugly.
just base on looks. FRS > WRX. |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Drives: 2012 WRX, 2003 RSX Type S
Location: TN, AK, VA, S. Korea, NC
Posts: 451
Thanks: 12
Thanked 284 Times in 154 Posts
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to blackhawkdown For This Useful Post: | dave77 (05-06-2014) |
|
|
#48 | |
|
Big Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Drives: 2014 FR-S
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 284
Thanks: 216
Thanked 91 Times in 56 Posts
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Site Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2010
Drives: Supra
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,797
Thanks: 1,155
Thanked 2,182 Times in 965 Posts
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
|
IMO, I always thought WRXs were ugly looking cars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|